Literature DB >> 15371444

Similarities between the abiotic reduction of selenite with glutathione and the dissimilatory reaction mediated by Rhodospirillum rubrum and Escherichia coli.

Janine Kessi1, Kurt W Hanselmann.   

Abstract

Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain the biological dissimilatory reduction of selenite (SeO3(2-)) to elemental selenium (Se(o)), although none is without controversy. Glutathione, the most abundant thiol in the eukaryotic cells, the cyanobacteria, and the alpha, beta, and gamma groups of the proteobacteria, has long been suspected to be involved in selenium metabolism. Experiments with the phototrophic alpha proteobacterium Rhodospirillum rubrum showed that the rate of selenite reduction was decreased when bacteria synthesized lower than normal levels of glutathione, and in Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Escherichia coli the reaction was reported to induce glutathione reductase. In the latter organism superoxide dismutase was also induced in cells grown in the presence of selenite, indicating that superoxide anions (O2-) were produced. These observations led us to investigate the abiotic (chemical) reduction of selenite by glutathione and to compare the features of this reaction with those of the reaction mediated by R. rubrum and E. coli. Our findings imply that selenite was first reduced to selenodiglutathione, which reached its maximum concentration within the 1st min of the reaction. Formation of selenodiglutathione was paralleled by a rapid reduction of cytochrome c, a known oxidant for superoxide anions. Cytochrome c reduction was inhibited by superoxide dismutase, indicating that O2- was the source of electrons for the reduction. These results demonstrated that superoxide was produced in the abiotic reduction of selenite with glutathione, thus lending support to the hypothesis that glutathione may be involved in the reaction mediated by R. rubrum and E. coli. The second phase of the reaction, which led to the formation of elemental selenium (Se(o)), developed more slowly. Se(o) precipitation reached a maximum within 2 h after the beginning of the reaction. Secondary reactions leading to the degradation of the superoxide significantly decreased the yield of Se(o) in the abiotic reaction compared with that of the bacterially mediated selenite reduction. Abiotically formed selenium particles showed the same characteristic orange-red color, spherical structure, and size as particles produced by R. rubrum, again providing support for the hypothesis that glutathione is involved in the reduction of selenite to elemental selenium in this organism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15371444     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M405887200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  47 in total

1.  Resolution of distinct membrane-bound enzymes from Enterobacter cloacae SLD1a-1 that are responsible for selective reduction of nitrate and selenate oxyanions.

Authors:  Helen Ridley; Carys A Watts; David J Richardson; Clive S Butler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Response surface design for accumulation of selenium by different lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Jingpeng Yang; Yao Li; Li Zhang; Mingtao Fan; Xinyuan Wei
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 3.  Ecology and biotechnology of selenium-respiring bacteria.

Authors:  Y V Nancharaiah; P N L Lens
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Reduction of selenite by Azospirillum brasilense with the formation of selenium nanoparticles.

Authors:  Anna V Tugarova; Elena P Vetchinkina; Ekaterina A Loshchinina; Andrei M Burov; Valentina E Nikitina; Alexander A Kamnev
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus growth on tellurite-containing media by Lactobacillus reuteri Is dependent on CyuC and thiol production.

Authors:  Mark S Turner; Raquel Lo; Philip M Giffard
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Shedding light on selenium biomineralization: proteins associated with bionanominerals.

Authors:  Markus Lenz; Boris Kolvenbach; Benjamin Gygax; Suzette Moes; Philippe F X Corvini
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  A bacterial process for selenium nanosphere assembly.

Authors:  Charles M Debieux; Elizabeth J Dridge; Claudia M Mueller; Peter Splatt; Konrad Paszkiewicz; Iona Knight; Hannah Florance; John Love; Richard W Titball; Richard J Lewis; David J Richardson; Clive S Butler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Enzyme-Catalyzed in situ Synthesis of Temporally and Spatially Distinct CdSe Quantum Dots in Biological Backgrounds.

Authors:  Ryan A Riskowski; Richard S Nemeth; Kanda Borgognoni; Christopher J Ackerson
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.126

9.  Methanococcus vannielii selenium-binding protein (SeBP): chemical reactivity of recombinant SeBP produced in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Kemberly G Patteson; Neel Trivedi; Thressa C Stadtman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Stenotrophomonas maltophilia SeITE02, a new bacterial strain suitable for bioremediation of selenite-contaminated environmental matrices.

Authors:  Paolo Antonioli; Silvia Lampis; Irene Chesini; Giovanni Vallini; Sara Rinalducci; Lello Zolla; Pier Giorgio Righetti
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.