Literature DB >> 24135316

Paenirhodobacter enshiensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a non-photosynthetic bacterium isolated from soil, and emended descriptions of the genera Rhodobacter and Haematobacter.

Dan Wang1, Hongliang Liu1, Shixue Zheng1, Gejiao Wang1.   

Abstract

A Gram-reaction-negative, facultatively anaerobic, non-motile, rod-shaped, non-photosynthetic bacterial strain, DW2-9(T), was isolated from soil. The highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities were found to Rhodobacter capsulatus ATCC 11166(T) (97.1%), Rhodobacter viridis JA737(T) (96.4%), Rhodobacter maris JA276(T) (96.2%), Rhodobacter veldkampii ATCC 35703(T) (96.0%), Haematobacter massiliensis CCUG 47968(T) (96.0%), Haematobacter missouriensis CCUG 52307(T) (95.9%) and Rhodobacter aestuarii JA296(T) (95.7%). The genomic DNA G+C content was 67.2 mol% and the major respiratory quinone was ubiquinone 10 (Q-10). The major cellular fatty acids (>5%) were C(18 : 1)ω7c, C(16 : 0), C(19 : 0) cyclo ω8c and summed feature 3 (one or more of iso-C(15 : 0) 2-OH, C(16 : 1)ω6c and C(16 : 1)ω7c). However, unlike species of the genus Rhodobacter, strain DW2-9(T) neither formed internal photosynthetic membranes nor produced photosynthetic pigments. DNA-DNA hybridization between strain DW2-9(T) and R. capsulatus JCM 21090(T) showed a relatedness of 33%. Strain DW2-9(T) contained phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol and an unknown aminophospholipid as major polar lipids, which differed from those of species of the genera Rhodobacter and Haematobacter. In addition to the differences in phylogenetic position and polar lipid types, strain DW2-9(T) could be distinguished from species of the genus Haematobacter by the cultivation conditions. On the basis of our polyphasic taxonomic analysis, strain DW2-9(T) is considered to represent a novel genus and species, for which the name Paenirhodobacter enshiensis gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain of Paenirhodobacter enshiensis is DW2-9(T) ( = CCTCC AB 2011145(T) = KCTC 15169(T)). Emended descriptions of the genera Rhodobacter and Haematobacter are also proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24135316     DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.050351-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol        ISSN: 1466-5026            Impact factor:   2.747


  3 in total

1.  Taxogenomics Resolves Conflict in the Genus Rhodobacter: A Two and Half Decades Pending Thought to Reclassify the Genus Rhodobacter.

Authors:  G Suresh; Tushar D Lodha; B Indu; Ch Sasikala; Ch V Ramana
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Roseobacters in a Sea of Poly- and Paraphyly: Whole Genome-Based Taxonomy of the Family Rhodobacteraceae and the Proposal for the Split of the "Roseobacter Clade" Into a Novel Family, Roseobacteraceae fam. nov.

Authors:  Kevin Y H Liang; Fabini D Orata; Yann F Boucher; Rebecca J Case
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Draft genomic sequence of a selenite-reducing bacterium, Paenirhodobacter enshiensis DW2-9(T).

Authors:  Dan Wang; Fengqiu Zhu; Xiaoli Zhu; Shixue Zheng; Rui Wang; Gejiao Wang
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2015-07-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.