Christopher W Baugh1, Li-Jung Liang2, Marc A Probst3, Benjamin C Sun4. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Syncope is a frequent emergency department (ED) presenting complaint and results in a disproportionate rate of hospitalization with variable management strategies. The objective was to estimate the annual national cost savings, reduction in inpatient hospitalizations, and reduction in hospital bed hours from implementation of protocolized care in an observation unit. METHODS: We created a Monte Carlo simulation by building a model that reflects current clinical practice in the United States and uses inputs gathered from the most recent available peer-reviewed literature and national survey data. ED visit volume was adjusted to reflect observation unit availability and the portion of observation visits requiring subsequent inpatient care. A recent multicenter randomized controlled study informed the cost savings and length of stay reduction per observation unit visit model inputs. The study population included patients aged 50 years and older with syncope deemed at intermediate risk for serious 30-day cardiovascular outcomes. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) annual cost savings was estimated to be $108 million (±$89 million) from avoiding 235,000 (±13,900) inpatient admissions, resulting in 4,297,000 (±1,242,000) fewer hospital bed hours. CONCLUSIONS: The potential national cost savings for managing selected patients with syncope in a dedicated observation unit is substantial. Syncope is one of many conditions suitable for care in an observation unit as an alternative to an inpatient setting. As pressure to decrease hospital length of stay and bill short-stay hospitalizations as observation increases, syncope illustrates the value of observation unit care.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES:Syncope is a frequent emergency department (ED) presenting complaint and results in a disproportionate rate of hospitalization with variable management strategies. The objective was to estimate the annual national cost savings, reduction in inpatient hospitalizations, and reduction in hospital bed hours from implementation of protocolized care in an observation unit. METHODS: We created a Monte Carlo simulation by building a model that reflects current clinical practice in the United States and uses inputs gathered from the most recent available peer-reviewed literature and national survey data. ED visit volume was adjusted to reflect observation unit availability and the portion of observation visits requiring subsequent inpatient care. A recent multicenter randomized controlled study informed the cost savings and length of stay reduction per observation unit visit model inputs. The study population included patients aged 50 years and older with syncope deemed at intermediate risk for serious 30-day cardiovascular outcomes. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) annual cost savings was estimated to be $108 million (±$89 million) from avoiding 235,000 (±13,900) inpatient admissions, resulting in 4,297,000 (±1,242,000) fewer hospital bed hours. CONCLUSIONS: The potential national cost savings for managing selected patients with syncope in a dedicated observation unit is substantial. Syncope is one of many conditions suitable for care in an observation unit as an alternative to an inpatient setting. As pressure to decrease hospital length of stay and bill short-stay hospitalizations as observation increases, syncope illustrates the value of observation unit care.
Authors: Lauren T Southerland; Katherine M Hunold; Christopher R Carpenter; Jeffrey M Caterino; Lorraine C Mion Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2018-12-13 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Marc A Probst; Erik P Hess; Maggie Breslin; Dominick L Frosch; Benjamin C Sun; Marie-Noelle Langan; Lynne D Richardson Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Marc A Probst; Erica Su; Robert E Weiss; Annick N Yagapen; Susan E Malveau; David H Adler; Aveh Bastani; Christopher W Baugh; Jeffrey M Caterino; Carol L Clark; Deborah B Diercks; Judd E Hollander; Bret A Nicks; Daniel K Nishijima; Manish N Shah; Kirk A Stiffler; Alan B Storrow; Scott T Wilber; Benjamin C Sun Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Matthew A Wheatley; Shikha Kapil; Amanda Lewis; Jessica Walsh O'Sullivan; Joshua Armentrout; Tim P Moran; Anwar Osborne; Brooks L Moore; Bryan Morse; Peter Rhee; Faiz Ahmad; Hany Atallah Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2021-07-15
Authors: Yadiel Sánchez; Brian J Yun; Anand M Prabhakar; McKinley Glover; Benjamin A White; Theodore I Benzer; Ali S Raja Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2017-07-19
Authors: John R Marshall; Robert Katzer; Shahram Lotfipour; Bharath Chakravarthy; Siri Shastry; Jessica Andrusaitis; Craig L Anderson; Erik D Barton Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2017-01-19
Authors: Brad S Sutton; Sarah L Bermingham; Alexander Diamantopoulos; Sarah C Rosemas; Stelios I Tsintzos; Ying Xia; Matthew R Reynolds Journal: Open Heart Date: 2021-02