Gelareh Z Gabayan1, Li-Jung Liang2, Brian Doyle3, David Yu-Chuang Huang2, Catherine A Sarkisian4,5. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California. 2. Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. 3. Department of Medicine, Ohio State University. 4. Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California. 5. Department of Medicine, Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, a growing number of older Medicare beneficiaries visit the Emergency Department (ED) and have been placed in observation care. We investigated and compared the prevalence and factors associated with patients age ≥ 65 years with Medicare insurance who are placed in the hospital, observation care, or discharged following an ED visit. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from a nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare patients age ≥ 65 years during the year 2013. We performed multiple generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression analyses to assess the relationship between placement in a hospital vs. discharge, observation care vs. discharge, and observation care vs. admission. RESULTS: Of 537,455 Medicare beneficiaries age ≥ 65 years who visited an ED in 2013, 48.0% (N= 258,083) were discharged, 10.5% (N=56,184) placed in observation care, and 41.5% (N=223,188) were admitted to the inpatient service following the ED visit. The top 2 diagnoses associated with placement in the hospital vs. discharge were ischemic heart disease and renal disease. Patients with symptomatic diagnoses such as chest pain and dizziness were more likely to be placed in observation care following an ED visit as compared to admission to the hospital. CONCLUSION: Compared to prior studies, we found a greater number of older Medicare ED patients placed in observation care and a lower number admitted to the hospital. Most common diagnoses of placement in observation care were symptom-based as compared to being admitted to the hospital which were disease-based.
BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, a growing number of older Medicare beneficiaries visit the Emergency Department (ED) and have been placed in observation care. We investigated and compared the prevalence and factors associated with patients age ≥ 65 years with Medicare insurance who are placed in the hospital, observation care, or discharged following an ED visit. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from a nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare patients age ≥ 65 years during the year 2013. We performed multiple generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression analyses to assess the relationship between placement in a hospital vs. discharge, observation care vs. discharge, and observation care vs. admission. RESULTS: Of 537,455 Medicare beneficiaries age ≥ 65 years who visited an ED in 2013, 48.0% (N= 258,083) were discharged, 10.5% (N=56,184) placed in observation care, and 41.5% (N=223,188) were admitted to the inpatient service following the ED visit. The top 2 diagnoses associated with placement in the hospital vs. discharge were ischemic heart disease and renal disease. Patients with symptomatic diagnoses such as chest pain and dizziness were more likely to be placed in observation care following an ED visit as compared to admission to the hospital. CONCLUSION: Compared to prior studies, we found a greater number of older Medicare ED patients placed in observation care and a lower number admitted to the hospital. Most common diagnoses of placement in observation care were symptom-based as compared to being admitted to the hospital which were disease-based.
Authors: Gelareh Z Gabayan; Stephen F Derose; Steven M Asch; Sau Yiu; Elizabeth M Lancaster; K Trudy Poon; Jerome R Hoffman; Benjamin C Sun Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2011-07-29 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Gelareh Z Gabayan; Steven M Asch; Renee Y Hsia; David Zingmond; Li-Jung Liang; Weijuan Han; Heather McCreath; Robert E Weiss; Benjamin C Sun Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Mark J Sarnak; Andrew S Levey; Anton C Schoolwerth; Josef Coresh; Bruce Culleton; L Lee Hamm; Peter A McCullough; Bertram L Kasiske; Ellie Kelepouris; Michael J Klag; Patrick Parfrey; Marc Pfeffer; Leopoldo Raij; David J Spinosa; Peter W Wilson Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gelareh Z Gabayan; Stephen F Derose; Steven M Asch; Vicki Y Chiu; Sungching C Glenn; Carol M Mangione; Benjamin C Sun Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2010-01-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Arjun K Venkatesh; Benjamin P Geisler; Jennifer J Gibson Chambers; Christopher W Baugh; J Stephen Bohan; Jeremiah D Schuur Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 3.240