Literature DB >> 29288554

Development of a Patient Decision Aid for Syncope in the Emergency Department: the SynDA Tool.

Marc A Probst1, Erik P Hess2, Maggie Breslin3, Dominick L Frosch4, Benjamin C Sun5, Marie-Noelle Langan6, Lynne D Richardson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to develop a patient decision aid (DA) to promote shared decision making (SDM) for stable, alert patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with syncope.
METHODS: Using input from patients, clinicians, and experts in the field of syncope, health care design, and SDM, we created a prototype of a paper-based DA to engage patients in the disposition decision (admission vs. discharge) after an unremarkable ED evaluation for syncope. In phase 1, we conducted one-on-one semistructured exploratory interviews with 10 emergency physicians and 10 ED syncope patients. In phase 2, we conducted one-on-one directed interviews with 15 emergency care clinicians, five cardiologists, and 12 ED syncope patients to get detailed feedback on DA content and design. We iteratively modified the aid using feedback from each interviewee until clarity and usability had been optimized.
RESULTS: The 11 × 17-inch, paper-based DA, titled SynDA, includes four sections: 1) explanation of syncope, 2) explanation of future risks, 3) personalized 30-day risk estimate, and 4) disposition options. The personalized risk estimate is calculated using a recently published syncope risk-stratification tool. This risk estimate is stated in natural frequency and graphically displayed using a 100-person color-coded pictogram. Patient-oriented questions are included to stimulate dialogue between patient and clinician. At the end of the development process, patient and physician participants expressed satisfaction with the clarity and usability of the DA.
CONCLUSIONS: We iteratively developed an evidence-based DA to facilitate SDM for alert syncope patients after an unremarkable ED evaluation. Further testing is required to determine its effects on patient care. This DA has the potential to improve care for syncope patients and promote patient-centered care in emergency medicine.
© 2017 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29288554      PMCID: PMC5906162          DOI: 10.1111/acem.13373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  30 in total

1.  Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes.

Authors:  James V Quinn; Ian G Stiell; Daniel A McDermott; Karen L Sellers; Michael A Kohn; George A Wells
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Prospective evaluation and outcome of patients admitted for syncope over a 1 year period.

Authors:  J-J Blanc; C L'Her; A Touiza; B Garo; E L'Her; J Mansourati
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Emergency Physicians' Perceptions and Decision-making Processes Regarding Patients Presenting with Palpitations.

Authors:  Marc A Probst; Hemal K Kanzaria; Jerome R Hoffman; William R Mower; Roya S Moheimani; Benjamin C Sun; Denise D Quigley
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  Predicting Short-term Risk of Arrhythmia among Patients With Syncope: The Canadian Syncope Arrhythmia Risk Score.

Authors:  Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Ian G Stiell; Marco L A Sivilotti; Brian H Rowe; Muhammad Mukarram; Kirtana Arcot; Kenneth Kwong; Andrew D McRae; George A Wells; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  The chest pain choice decision aid: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Erik P Hess; Meghan A Knoedler; Nilay D Shah; Jeffrey A Kline; Maggie Breslin; Megan E Branda; Laurie J Pencille; Brent R Asplin; David M Nestler; Annie T Sadosty; Ian G Stiell; Henry H Ting; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-04-10

6.  Failure to validate the San Francisco Syncope Rule in an independent emergency department population.

Authors:  Adrienne Birnbaum; David Esses; Polly Bijur; Andrew Wollowitz; E John Gallagher
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 7.  A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care.

Authors:  John T James
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  The design of a decision aid about diabetes medications for use during the consultation with patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Maggie Breslin; Rebecca J Mullan; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-09-03

9.  Development of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score to predict serious adverse events after emergency department assessment of syncope.

Authors:  Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Kenneth Kwong; George A Wells; Marco L A Sivilotti; Muhammad Mukarram; Brian H Rowe; Eddy Lang; Jeffrey J Perry; Robert Sheldon; Ian G Stiell; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  The Physician-as-Stakeholder: An Exploratory Qualitative Analysis of Physicians' Motivations for Using Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Sarah L Goff; Tala R Elia; Errel R Khordipour; Kye E Poronsky; Kelly A Nault; Peter K Lindenauer; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.451

View more
  7 in total

1.  Behind the Scenes of Successful Research in Emergency Medicine: Nine Tips for Junior Investigators.

Authors:  Marc A Probst; Nicholas D Caputo; Bernard P Chang
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2019-09-12

2.  Shared Decision Making in Patients With Suspected Uncomplicated Ureterolithiasis: A Decision Aid Development Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Connor Houghton; Pooja M Patel; Leanora W Merwin; Kye P Poronsky; Anna L Caroll; Carol Sánchez Santana; Maggie Breslin; Charles D Scales; Peter K Lindenauer; Kathleen M Mazor; Erik P Hess
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Shared Decision Making for Syncope in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.

Authors:  Marc A Probst; Michelle P Lin; Jeremy J Sze; Erik P Hess; Maggie Breslin; Dominick L Frosch; Benjamin C Sun; Marie-Noelle Langan; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Lynne D Richardson
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  "I know my body better than you:" patient focus groups to inform a decision aid on oral corticosteroid use during pregnancy.

Authors:  Kristin Palmsten; Dani Bredesen; Meghan M JaKa; Pritika C Kumar; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Elyse O Kharbanda
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Evaluating health service outcomes of public involvement in health service design in high-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicola Lloyd; Amanda Kenny; Nerida Hyett
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Clinicians' perspectives on the implementation of patient decision aids in the emergency department: A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Tausif Billah; Lauren Gordon; Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Bernard P Chang; Erik P Hess; Marc A Probst
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-01-19

7.  Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration.

Authors:  Holly O Witteman; Kristin G Maki; Gratianne Vaisson; Jeanette Finderup; Krystina B Lewis; Karina Dahl Steffensen; Caroline Beaudoin; Sandrine Comeau; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.583

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.