Literature DB >> 31080027

Clinical Benefit of Hospitalization for Older Adults With Unexplained Syncope: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Marc A Probst1, Erica Su2, Robert E Weiss2, Annick N Yagapen3, Susan E Malveau3, David H Adler4, Aveh Bastani5, Christopher W Baugh6, Jeffrey M Caterino7, Carol L Clark8, Deborah B Diercks9, Judd E Hollander10, Bret A Nicks11, Daniel K Nishijima12, Manish N Shah13, Kirk A Stiffler14, Alan B Storrow15, Scott T Wilber14, Benjamin C Sun3.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Many adults with syncope are hospitalized solely for observation and testing. We seek to determine whether hospitalization versus outpatient management for older adults with unexplained syncope is associated with a reduction in postdisposition serious adverse events at 30 days.
METHODS: We performed a propensity score analysis using data from a prospective, observational study of older adults with unexplained syncope or near syncope who presented to 11 emergency departments (EDs) in the United States. We enrolled adults (≥60 years) who presented with syncope or near syncope. We excluded patients with a serious diagnosis identified in the ED. Clinical and laboratory data were collected on all patients. The primary outcome was rate of post-ED serious adverse events at 30 days.
RESULTS: We enrolled 2,492 older adults with syncope and no serious ED diagnosis from April 2013 to September 2016. Mean age was 73 years (SD 8.9 years), and 51% were women. The incidence of serious adverse events within 30 days after the index visit was 7.4% for hospitalized patients and 3.19% for discharged patients, representing an unadjusted difference of 4.2% (95% confidence interval 2.38% to 6.02%). After propensity score matching on risk of hospitalization, there was no statistically significant difference in serious adverse events at 30 days between the hospitalized group (4.89%) and the discharged group (2.82%) (risk difference 2.07%; 95% confidence interval -0.24% to 4.38%).
CONCLUSION: In our propensity-matched sample of older adults with unexplained syncope, for those with clinical characteristics similar to that of the discharged cohort, hospitalization was not associated with improvement in 30-day serious adverse event rates.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31080027      PMCID: PMC6650347          DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.03.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  32 in total

1.  Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes.

Authors:  James V Quinn; Ian G Stiell; Daniel A McDermott; Karen L Sellers; Michael A Kohn; George A Wells
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Characteristics and admission patterns of patients presenting with syncope to U.S. emergency departments, 1992-2000.

Authors:  Benjamin C Sun; Jennifer A Emond; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Direct medical costs of syncope-related hospitalizations in the United States.

Authors:  Benjamin C Sun; Jennifer A Emond; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope.

Authors:  J Stephen Huff; Wyatt W Decker; James V Quinn; Andrew D Perron; Anthony M Napoli; Suzanne Peeters; Andy S Jagoda
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  External validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule.

Authors:  Benjamin C Sun; Carol M Mangione; Guy Merchant; Timothy Weiss; Gil Z Shlamovitz; Gelareh Zargaraff; Sharon Shiraga; Jerome R Hoffman; William R Mower
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Syncope Evaluation in the Emergency Department Study (SEEDS): a multidisciplinary approach to syncope management.

Authors:  Win K Shen; Wyatt W Decker; Peter A Smars; Deepi G Goyal; Ann E Walker; David O Hodge; Jane M Trusty; Karen M Brekke; Arshad Jahangir; Peter A Brady; Thomas M Munger; Bernard J Gersh; Stephen C Hammill; Robert L Frye
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Do patients with a negative Emergency Department evaluation for syncope require hospital admission?

Authors:  Rumm M Morag; Linette F Murdock; Zaber A Khan; Mitchell J Heller; Barry E Brenner
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  Failure to validate the San Francisco Syncope Rule in an independent emergency department population.

Authors:  Adrienne Birnbaum; David Esses; Polly Bijur; Andrew Wollowitz; E John Gallagher
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Development and prospective validation of a risk stratification system for patients with syncope in the emergency department: the OESIL risk score.

Authors:  Furio Colivicchi; Fabrizio Ammirati; Domenico Melina; Vincenzo Guido; Giuseppe Imperoli; Massimo Santini
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 10.  Evaluation and management of the patient with syncope.

Authors:  W N Kapoor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-11-11       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  7 in total

1.  Just the facts: how to assess a patient presenting to the emergency department with syncope.

Authors:  Hans Rosenberg; Avik Nath; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.410

Review 2.  Current approach to the treatment of vasovagal syncope in adults.

Authors:  Tarek Hatoum; Satish Raj; Robert Stanley Sheldon
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2022-09-18       Impact factor: 5.472

3.  Development of a Novel Emergency Department Quality Measure to Reduce Very Low-Risk Syncope Hospitalizations.

Authors:  Marc A Probst; Alexander T Janke; Adrian D Haimovich; Arjun K Venkatesh; Michelle P Lin; Keith E Kocher; Marie-Joe Nemnom; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.762

4.  Lack of benefit from hospitalization in patients with syncope: A propensity analysis.

Authors:  Padma Kaul; Dat T Tran; Roopinder K Sandhu; Monica Solbiati; Giorgio Costantino; Robert S Sheldon
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2020-09-08

5.  Benefit of hospital admission for detecting serious adverse events among emergency department patients with syncope: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort.

Authors:  Rohin J Krishnan; Muhammad Mukarram; Bahareh Ghaedi; Marco L A Sivilotti; Natalie Le Sage; Justin W Yan; Paul Huang; Mona Hegdekar; Eric Mercier; Marie-Joe Nemnom; Lisa A Calder; Andrew D McRae; Brian H Rowe; George A Wells; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Shared Decision Making for Syncope in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.

Authors:  Marc A Probst; Michelle P Lin; Jeremy J Sze; Erik P Hess; Maggie Breslin; Dominick L Frosch; Benjamin C Sun; Marie-Noelle Langan; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Lynne D Richardson
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 7.  A Rational Evaluation of the Syncope Patient: Optimizing the Emergency Department Visit.

Authors:  Tarek Hatoum; Robert S Sheldon
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.