Literature DB >> 26202021

The effect of acetabular and femoral component version on dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Takaaki Fujishiro1,2, Takafumi Hiranaka3, Shingo Hashimoto4, Shinya Hayashi4, Masahiro Kurosaka4, Taiki Kanno5, Takeshi Masuda5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to: (1) investigate the variation of both acetabular and femoral component version in a large series of consecutive primary THA patients, and (2) to better define the associations of acetabular and femoral component alignment and clinical factors with subsequent hip dislocation in those patients.
METHODS: We analyzed CT scans of 1,555 consecutive primary THAs and measured version of the components. We also documented the frequency and direction of subsequent dislocation as well as femoral head size, posterior tissue repair, any history of previous hip surgery, and gender.
RESULTS: The dislocation rate after THA was 3.22 %. The dislocation risk was 1.9 times higher if cup anteversion was not between 10° and 30°. Compared to hips that did not dislocate, those that experienced anterior dislocation had a significantly greater combined anteversion; those that dislocated posteriorly had a significantly smaller combined anteversion. Hips with previous rotational acetabular osteotomy or head size smaller than 28 mm correlated with an increased dislocation rate.
CONCLUSION: The dislocation risk could be higher if cup anteversion was not between 10° and 30°. Greater combined anteversion could be a risk factor of anterior dislocation, and posterior dislocation could be more common in smaller combined anteversion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Component version; Computed tomography; Dislocation; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26202021     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2924-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  The use of combined anteversion in total hip arthroplasty for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Jingwei Zhang; Liao Wang; Yuanqing Mao; Huiwu Li; Huifeng Ding; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty among patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Liao Wang; Robert T Trousdale; Songtao Ai; Kai-Nan An; Kerong Dai; Bernard F Morrey
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: risk factors and treatment options.

Authors:  Ulf Gunther Leichtle; Carmen Ina Leichtle; Ferdane Taslaci; Patrik Reize; Markus Wünschel
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.511

4.  Is the acetabular cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty on a two dimension or three dimension model accurate?

Authors:  Benjamin Craiovan; Tobias Renkawitz; Markus Weber; Joachim Grifka; Lutz Nolte; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Donald W Howie; Oksana T Holubowycz; Robert Middleton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  B M Jolles; P Zangger; P-F Leyvraz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Y Woo; B F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk.

Authors:  Jacques H Caton; Jean Louis Prudhon; André Ferreira; Thierry Aslanian; Régis Verdier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Is cup positioning challenged in hips previously treated with periacetabular osteotomy?

Authors:  Charlotte Hartig-Andreasen; Maiken Stilling; Kjeld Søballe; Theis M Thillemann; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  10 in total

1.  Accuracy of plain antero-posterior radiographic-based methods for measurement of acetabular cup version.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Alzohiry; Mohammad Kamal Abdelnasser; Mohamed Moustafa; Mohamed Mahran; Hatem Bakr; Yaser Khalifa; Ahmed Abelaal; Haisam Atta; Galal Zaki Said
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The synergetic effect of pelvic rotation and X-ray offset on radiographic angles of the acetabular cup.

Authors:  Jing-Xin Zhao; Xiu-Yun Su; Zhe Zhao; Ruo-Xiu Xiao; Guo-Fei Sun; Li-Cheng Zhang; Pei-Fu Tang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Improving Acetabular Component Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Cadaveric Study of an Inertial Navigation Tool and a Novel Registration Method.

Authors:  Jobe Shatrov; Daniel Marsden-Jones; Matt Lyons; William L Walter
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-11-02

4.  Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takaaki Ohmori; Tamon Kabata; Yoshitomo Kajino; Tadashi Taga; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Daisuke Inoue; Takashi Yamamoto; Tomoharu Takagi; Junya Yoshitani; Takuro Ueno; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  The role of the femoral component orientation on dislocations in THA: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joost H J van Erp; Thom E Snijders; Harrie Weinans; René M Castelein; Tom P C Schlösser; Arthur de Gast
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 6.  Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kurt G Seagrave; Anders Troelsen; Henrik Malchau; Henrik Husted; Kirill Gromov
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Is the cup orientation different in bilateral total hip arthroplasty with right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach?

Authors:  Xinggui Song; Ming Ni; Heng Li; Xin Li; Xiang Li; Jun Fu; Jiying Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Trigonometric Algorithm Defining the True Three-Dimensional Acetabular Cup Orientation: Correlation Between Measured and Calculated Cup Orientation Angles.

Authors:  T E Snijders; T P C Schlösser; S M van Gaalen; R M Castelein; H Weinans; A de Gast
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2018-07-12

9.  Calculation of the 3-D femoral component's orientation in total hip arthroplasty using a trigonometric algorithm.

Authors:  Joost H J van Erp; Tom P C Schlösser; Ariënne W Baijense; Thom E Snijders; Rob Stevenson; Willem Paul Gielis; René M Castelein; Harrie Weinans; Arthur de Gast
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Component placement accuracy of two digital intraoperative fluoroscopy supplementation systems in direct anterior total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tyler Thorne; Scott Nishioka; Samantha Andrews; Kristin Mathews; Cass Nakasone
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.067

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.