Literature DB >> 26201967

De-agglomeration Effect of the US Pharmacopeia and Alberta Throats on Carrier-Based Powders in Commercial Inhalation Products.

Sharon Shui Yee Leung1, Patricia Tang1, Qi Tony Zhou1, Zhenbo Tong2, Cassandra Leung1, Janwit Decharaksa1, Runyu Yang3, Hak-Kim Chan4.   

Abstract

The US pharmacopeia (USP) and Alberta throats were recently reported to cause further de-agglomeration of carrier-free powders emitted from some dry powder inhalers (DPIs). This study assessed if they have similar influences on commercially available carrier-based DPIs. A straight tube, a USP throat, and an Alberta throat (non-coated and coated) were used for cascade impaction testing. Aerosol fine particle fraction (FPF ≤ 5 μm) was computed to evaluate throat-induced de-agglomeration. Computational fluid dynamics are employed to simulate airflow patterns and particle trajectories inside the USP and Alberta throats. For all tested products, no significant differences in the in vitro aerosol performance were observed between the USP throat and the straight tube. Using fine lactose carriers (<10 μm), Symbicort(®) and Oxis(™) showed minimal impaction inside the Alberta throat and resulted in similar FPF among all induction ports. For products using coarse lactose carriers (>10 μm), impaction frequency and energy inside the Alberta throat were significant. Further de-agglomeration was noted inside the non-coated Alberta throat for Seretide(®) and Spiriva(®), but agglomerates emitted from Relenza(®), Ventolin(®), and Foradil(®) did not further break up into smaller fractions. The coated Alberta throat considerably reduced the FPF values of these products due to the high throat retention, but they generally agreed better with the in vivo data. In conclusion, depending on the powder formulation (including carrier particle size), the inhaler, and the induction port, further de-agglomeration could happen ex-inhaler and create differences in the in vitro measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  USP throat; dry powder inhaler; idealized mouth-throat geometry; lactose carrier; powder aerosols

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26201967      PMCID: PMC4627448          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-015-9802-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  18 in total

1.  Next generation pharmaceutical impactor (a new impactor for pharmaceutical inhaler testing). Part I: Design.

Authors:  Virgil A Marple; Daryl L Roberts; Francisco J Romay; Nicholas C Miller; Keith G Truman; Michiel Van Oort; Bo Olsson; Michael J Holroyd; Jolyon P Mitchell; Dieter Hochrainer
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2003

2.  Deposition of Foradil P in human lungs: comparison of in vitro and in vivo data.

Authors:  T Meyer; P Brand; H Ehlich; R Köbrich; G Meyer; F Riedinger; K Sommerer; T Weuthen; G Scheuch
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2004

3.  Dry powder inhaler device influence on carrier particle performance.

Authors:  Martin J Donovan; Sin Hyen Kim; Venkatramanan Raman; Hugh D Smyth
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  Impact angles as an alternative way to improve aerosolisation of powders for inhalation?

Authors:  Santoso Adi; Zhenbo Tong; Hak-Kim Chan; Runyu Yang; Aibing Yu
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 4.384

5.  Lung deposition of radiolabeled tiotropium in healthy subjects and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Peter Brand; Thomas Meyer; Thomas Weuthen; Wolfgang Timmer; Erhard Berkel; Gudrun Wallenstein; Gerhard Scheuch
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 3.126

6.  Comparison of deposition in the USP and physical mouth-throat models with solid and liquid particles.

Authors:  Yue Zhou; Jaijie Sun; Yung-Sung Cheng
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.849

7.  The relationship between powder inhaler resistance and peak inspiratory conditions in healthy volunteers--implications for in vitro testing.

Authors:  A R Clark; A M Hollingworth
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  1993

8.  Pharmacoscintigraphic evaluation of lung deposition of inhaled zanamivir in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  L M Cass; J Brown; M Pickford; S Fayinka; S P Newman; C J Johansson; A Bye
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Emitted dose estimates from Seretide Diskus and Symbicort Turbuhaler following inhalation by severe asthmatics.

Authors:  Walid Y Tarsin; Stanley B Pearson; Khaled H Assi; Henry Chrystyn
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 5.875

10.  In vivo-in vitro comparison of deposition in three mouth-throat models with Qvar and Turbuhaler inhalers.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Kyle Gilbertson; Warren H Finlay
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2007
View more
  3 in total

1.  In Vitro and In Silico Investigations on Drug Delivery in the Mouth-Throat Models with Handihaler®.

Authors:  Fen Huang; Xudong Zhou; Wen Dai; Jiaqi Yu; Zongyan Zhou; Zhenbo Tong; Aibing Yu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 4.580

Review 2.  Repurposing drug molecules for new pulmonary therapeutic interventions.

Authors:  Piyush P Mehta; Vividha S Dhapte-Pawar
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.617

3.  Dry Powder Inhalers for Proteins Using Cryo-Milled Electrospun Polyvinyl Alcohol Nanofiber Mats.

Authors:  Takaaki Ito; Eriko Yamazoe; Kohei Tahara
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.927

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.