Literature DB >> 29018928

Tactile localization biases are modulated by gaze direction.

Sonia Medina1, Luigi Tamè2, Matthew R Longo3.   

Abstract

Identifying the spatial location of touch on the skin surface is a fundamental function of our somatosensory system. Despite the fact that stimulation of even single mechanoreceptive afferent fibres is sufficient to produce clearly localised percepts, tactile localisation can be modulated also by higher level processes such as body posture. This suggests that tactile events are coded using multiple representations using different coordinate systems. Recent reports provide evidence for systematic biases on tactile localisation task, which are thought to result from a supramodal representation of the skin surface. While the influence of non-informative vision of the body and gaze direction on tactile discrimination tasks has been extensively studied, their effects on tactile localisation tasks remain largely unexplored. To address this question, participants performed a tactile localization task on their left hand under different visual conditions by means of a mirror box; in the mirror condition, a single stimulus was delivered on participants' hand, while the reflexion of the right hand was seen through the mirror; in the object condition, participants looked at a box through the mirror, and in the right hand condition, participants looked directly at their right hand. Participants reported the location of the tactile stimuli using a silhouette of a hand. Results showed a shift in the localization of the touches towards the tip of the fingers (distal bias) and the thumb (radial biases) across conditions. Critically, distal biases were reduced when participants looked towards the mirror compared to when they looked at their right hand suggesting that gaze direction reduces the typical proximo-distal biases in tactile localization. Moreover, vision of the hand modulates the internal configuration of points' locations, by elongating it, in the radio-ulnar axis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body representation; Gaze direction; Tactile localization; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29018928     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5105-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  68 in total

1.  Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly.

Authors:  S P Tipper; N Phillips; C Dancer; D Lloyd; L A Howard; F McGlone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation.

Authors:  Clare Press; Marisa Taylor-Clarke; Steffan Kennett; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Vision of the body and the differentiation of perceived body side in touch.

Authors:  Luigi Tamè; Alessandro Farnè; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Visuo-tactile integration in personal space.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Jason Jiri Musil; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Which finger? Early effects of attentional selection within the hand are absent when the hand is viewed.

Authors:  Helge Gillmeister; Chiara F Sambo; Bettina Forster
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Vibrotactile localization on the abdomen: effects of place and space.

Authors:  Roger W Cholewiak; J Christopher Brill; Anja Schwab
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-08

7.  Eye position affects the perceived location of touch.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  The representation of space near the body through touch and vision.

Authors:  E Macaluso; A Maravita
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Visual detail about the body modulates tactile localisation biases.

Authors:  Aaron N Margolis; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  No Correlation between Distorted Body Representations Underlying Tactile Distance Perception and Position Sense.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Rosa Morcom
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  6 in total

1.  Whole-hand perceptual maps of joint location.

Authors:  Kasia A Myga; Klaudia B Ambroziak; Luigi Tamè; Alessandro Farnè; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The Roles of Attentional Shifts and Attentional Reengagement in Resolving The Spatial Compatibility Effect in Tactile Simon-like Tasks.

Authors:  Wanting Zheng; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  When Right Goes Left: Phantom Touch Induced by Mirror Box Procedure in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Raffaella Ricci; Michela Caldano; Ilaria Sabatelli; Emanuele Cirillo; Roberto Gammeri; Ezgi Cesim; Adriana Salatino; Anna Berti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Duration Comparisons for Vision and Touch Are Dependent on Presentation Order and Temporal Context.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Kamilla N Miller; Michael E Rudd; Michael A Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-23

5.  Measuring relative vibrotactile spatial acuity: effects of tactor type, anchor points and tactile anisotropy.

Authors:  Rebekka Hoffmann; Vigdís Vala Valgeirsdóttir; Ómar I Jóhannesson; Runar Unnthorsson; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  More than skin-deep: Integration of skin-based and musculoskeletal reference frames in localization of touch.

Authors:  Renata Sadibolova; Luigi Tamè; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.332

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.