Literature DB >> 26193801

Surgery in high-volume hospitals not commission on cancer accreditation leads to increased cancer-specific survival for early-stage lung cancer.

Elizabeth A David1, David T Cooke2, Yingjia Chen3, Andrew Perry2, Robert J Canter4, Rosemary Cress5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality of oncologic outcomes is of paramount importance in the care of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to evaluate the relationship of hospital volume for lobectomy on cancer-specific survival in NSCLC patients treated in California, as well as the influence of Commission on Cancer (CoC) accreditation.
METHODS: The California Cancer Registry was queried from 2004 to 2011 for cases of Stage I NSCLC and 8,345 patients were identified. Statistical analysis was used to determine prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival.
RESULTS: A total of 7,587 patients were treated surgically. CoC accreditation was not significant for cancer-specific survival, but treatment in high-volume centers was associated with longer survival when compared with low- and medium-volume centers (hazard ratio 1.77, 1.474 to 2.141 and hazard ratio 1.23, 1.058 to 1.438).
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that surgical treatment in high-volume hospitals is associated with longer cancer-specific survival for early-stage NSCLC, but that CoC accreditation is not. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer-specific survival; Commission on cancer accreditation; Lobectomy; Non–small cell lung cancer; Sublobar resection; Thoracic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26193801      PMCID: PMC4575899          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   3.125


  19 in total

1.  Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups.

Authors:  K Yost; C Perkins; R Cohen; C Morris; W Wright
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  High procedure volume is strongly associated with improved survival after lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Margreet Lüchtenborg; Sharma P Riaz; Victoria H Coupland; Eric Lim; Erik Jakobsen; Mark Krasnik; Richard Page; Michael J Lind; Michael D Peake; Henrik Møller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Impact of hospital volume of thoracoscopic lobectomy on primary lung cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Henry S Park; Frank C Detterbeck; Daniel J Boffa; Anthony W Kim
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  The relationship between hospital lung cancer resection volume and patient mortality risk.

Authors:  Benjamin D Kozower; George J Stukenborg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Variation in treatment and outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer by region, hospital type and volume in the Netherlands.

Authors:  M W J M Wouters; S Siesling; M L Jansen-Landheer; M A G Elferink; J Belderbos; J W Coebergh; F M N H Schramel
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Relationship between cancer center accreditation and performance on publicly reported quality measures.

Authors:  Ryan P Merkow; Jeanette W Chung; Jennifer L Paruch; David J Bentrem; Karl Y Bilimoria
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer.

Authors:  P B Bach; L D Cramer; D Schrag; R J Downey; S E Gelfand; C B Begg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  STS database risk models: predictors of mortality and major morbidity for lung cancer resection.

Authors:  Benjamin D Kozower; Shubin Sheng; Sean M O'Brien; Michael J Liptay; Christine L Lau; David R Jones; David M Shahian; Cameron D Wright
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Patient survival after surgical treatment of rectal cancer: impact of surgeon and hospital characteristics.

Authors:  David A Etzioni; Tonia M Young-Fadok; Robert R Cima; Nabil Wasif; Robert D Madoff; James M Naessens; Elizabeth B Habermann
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Andrew K Stewart; David P Winchester; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Regionalization of esophagectomy: where are we now?

Authors:  James M Clark; Daniel J Boffa; Robert A Meguid; Lisa M Brown; David T Cooke
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  [Minimum volumes in surgical treatment of lung cancer : A survey of thoracic surgeons in Germany on the introduction of a minimum volume regulation for surgical treatment of lung cancer].

Authors:  Tobias Robold; Michael Ried; Reiner Neu; Hans-Stefan Hofmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Ethnic Differences in Survival Among Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sarah N Price; Melissa Flores; Heidi A Hamann; John M Ruiz
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2021-07-07

4.  Hospital volume and postoperative 5-year survival for five different cancer sites: A population-based study in Japan.

Authors:  Sumiyo Okawa; Takahiro Tabuchi; Toshitaka Morishima; Shihoko Koyama; Yukari Taniyama; Isao Miyashiro
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 6.716

5.  Timeliness of cancer care in a regional Victorian health service: A comparison of high-volume (Lung) and low-volume (oesophagogastric) tumour streams.

Authors:  Mwila Kabwe; Amanda Robinson; Yachna Shethia; Carol Parker; Robert Blum; Ilana Solo; Michael Leach
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-10-07

6.  Racial Differences in Incident Genitourinary Cancer Cases Captured in the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Dylan T Wolff; Thomas F Monaghan; Danielle J Gordon; Kyle P Michelson; Tashzna Jones; Raymond Khargi; Matthew T Smith; Fenizia Maffucci; Hyezo Kwun; Nicholas R Suss; Andrew G Winer
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.