Literature DB >> 31489231

Regionalization of esophagectomy: where are we now?

James M Clark1, Daniel J Boffa2, Robert A Meguid3, Lisa M Brown1, David T Cooke1.   

Abstract

The morbidity and mortality benefits of performing high-risk operations in high-volume centers by high-volume surgeons are evident. Regionalization is a proposed strategy to leverage high-volume centers for esophagectomy to improve quality outcomes. Internationally, regionalization occurs under national mandates. Those mandates do not exist in the United States and spontaneous regionalization of esophagectomy has only modestly occurred in the U.S. Regionalization must strike a careful balance and not limit access to optimal oncologic care to our most vulnerable cancer patient populations in rural and disadvantaged socioeconomic areas. We reviewed the recent literature highlighting: the justification of hospital and surgeon annual esophagectomy volumes for regionalization; how safety performance metrics could influence regionalization; whether regionalization is occurring in the US; what impact regionalization may have on esophagectomy costs; and barriers to patients traveling to receive oncologic treatment at regionalized centers of excellence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophagectomy; regionalization; regionalization of surgeries; surgical outcome-volume relationships

Year:  2019        PMID: 31489231      PMCID: PMC6702400          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.07.88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  63 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Racial disparities in esophageal cancer treatment and outcomes.

Authors:  Alexander J Greenstein; Virginia R Litle; Scott J Swanson; Celia M Divino; Stuart Packer; Thomas G McGinn; Juan P Wisnivesky
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. 1979.

Authors:  Harold S Luft; John P Bunker; Alain C Enthoven
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Medicare program; hospital inpatient value-based purchasing program. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2011-05-06

5.  Variation in esophagectomy outcomes in hospitals meeting Leapfrog volume outcome standards.

Authors:  Thomas K Varghese; Douglas E Wood; Farhood Farjah; Brant K Oelschlager; Rebecca G Symons; Kara E MacLeod; David R Flum; Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Urban-rural differences in prostate cancer outcomes in Australia: what has changed?

Authors:  Peter D Baade; Danny R Youlden; Michael D Coory; Robert A Gardiner; Suzanne K Chambers
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Esophagectomy outcomes at low-volume hospitals: the association between systems characteristics and mortality.

Authors:  Luke M Funk; Atul A Gawande; Marcus E Semel; Stuart R Lipsitz; William R Berry; Michael J Zinner; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Kaizen method for esophagectomy patients: improved quality control, outcomes, and decreased costs.

Authors:  Mark D Iannettoni; William R Lynch; Kalpaj R Parekh; Kelley A McLaughlin
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  The effect of volume on esophageal cancer resections: what constitutes acceptable resection volumes for centers of excellence?

Authors:  Robert A Meguid; Eric S Weiss; David C Chang; Malcolm V Brock; Steven C Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Therese A Stukel; Andrea E Siewers; Philip P Goodney; David E Wennberg; F Lee Lucas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  Regionalization for thoracic surgery: Economic implications of regionalization in the United States.

Authors:  Melanie P Subramanian; Zhizhou Yang; Su-Hsin Chang; Varun Puri
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Variation in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome of Esophageal Cancer in a Regionalized Care System in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Steven Habbous; Olga Yermakhanova; Katharina Forster; Claire M B Holloway; Gail Darling
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01

3.  Rural-Urban Differences in Esophagectomy for Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph G Brungardt; Omar A Almoghrabi; Carolyn B Moore; G John Chen; Alykhan S Nagji
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2021-12-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.