Literature DB >> 11708334

Setting biomedical research priorities: justice, science, and public participation.

D Resnik1.   

Abstract

This paper addresses the appropriate role for public input into priority setting for federal funding of biomedical research and development. The public should be involved in priority setting because researchers should be publicly accountable, because the public has a right to oversee government activities, and because public input is needed to assess normative questions related to the burden of disease and health care needs. On the other hand, political factors arising from public input can also hamper the government's ability to allocate funds according to the burden of disease or to promote the progress of biomedical science. When it comes to public input into R & D priority setting, more is not necessarily better. What is needed is the right balance of public and expert decision making with respect to the setting of biomedical R & D priorities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11708334     DOI: 10.1353/ken.2001.0017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J        ISSN: 1054-6863


  17 in total

1.  Strategies for consulting with the community: the cases of four large-scale genetic databases.

Authors:  B Godard; J Marshall; C Laberge; B M Knoppers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Public involvement in setting a national research agenda: a mixed methods evaluation.

Authors:  Sandy Oliver; David G Armes; Gill Gyte
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Conceptualizing a quality plan for healthcare. A philosophical reflection on the relevance of the health profession to society.

Authors:  S Mehrdad Mohammadi; S Farzad Mohammadi; Jerris R Hedges
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-12

Review 4.  On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research.

Authors:  Jonathan Lomas; Naomi Fulop; Diane Gagnon; Pauline Allen
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Members of Minority and Underserved Communities Set Priorities for Health Research.

Authors:  Susan Dorr Goold; C Daniel Myers; Marion Danis; Julia Abelson; Steve Barnett; Karen Calhoun; Eric G Campbell; Lynette LaHAHNN; Adnan Hammad; René Pérez Rosenbaum; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Cengiz Salman; Lisa Szymecko; Zachary E Rowe
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  The case for Eliminating Disparities in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Daniel Goldberg
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Investments in cancer genomics: who benefits and who decides.

Authors:  Morris W Foster; John J Mulvihill; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Public engagements with health and medicine.

Authors:  Lisa Keränen
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2014-06

9.  Setting and meeting priorities in Indigenous health research in Australia and its application in the Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal health.

Authors:  Johanna M Monk; Kevin G Rowley; Ian Ps Anderson
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2009-11-20

10.  Beyond post-marketing research and MedWatch: Long-term studies of drug risks.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.