Literature DB >> 28288472

Research Ethics 2.0: New Perspectives on Norms, Values, and Integrity in Genomic Research in Times of Even Scarcer Resources.

Caroline Brall1, Els Maeckelberghe, Rouven Porz, Jihad Makhoul, Peter Schröder-Bäck.   

Abstract

Research ethics anew gained importance due to the changing scientific landscape and increasing demands and competition in the academic field. These changes are further exaggerated because of scarce(r) resources in some countries on the one hand and advances in genomics on the other. In this paper, we will highlight the current challenges thereof to scientific integrity. To mark key developments in research ethics, we will distinguish between what we call research ethics 1.0 and research ethics 2.0. Whereas research ethics 1.0 focuses on individual integrity and informed consent, research ethics 2.0 entails social scientific integrity within a broader perspective of a research network. This research network can be regarded as a network of responsibilities in which every stakeholder involved has to jointly meet the ethical challenges posed to research.
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Keywords:  Network of responsibility; Research ethics; Research network; Scientific integrity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28288472      PMCID: PMC5516405          DOI: 10.1159/000462960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  22 in total

1.  International research ethics.

Authors:  U Schuklenk; R Ashcroft
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.898

2.  Does informed consent to research require comprehension?

Authors:  Gopal Sreenivasan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Research ethics primer.

Authors:  Karen J Brasel
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  THE INTEGRITY OF PUBLIC HEALTH WORK.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Public Health (N Y)       Date:  1917-01

6.  Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions.

Authors:  Hauke Riesch; Clive Potter
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2013-08-27

7.  Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of evidence.

Authors:  Yao-long Chen; Ke-hu Yang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-09-05       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Italy's austerity measures have led to delays in allocating research funds.

Authors:  Fabio Turone
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-02-11

9.  Austerity vs. growth--the impact of the current financial crisis on pharmaceutical innovation.

Authors:  Dave Sharma; Luigi G Martini
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 5.875

10.  Biomedical research in an age of austerity.

Authors:  Hamilton Moses; E Ray Dorsey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  From a variety of ethics to the integrity and congruence of research on biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Claire Lajaunie
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2018-12-27

2.  Ethical aspects of digital health from a justice point of view.

Authors:  Caroline Brall; Peter Schröder-Bäck; Els Maeckelberghe
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.367

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.