Literature DB >> 26193091

Height and reproductive success in a cohort of british men.

Daniel Nettle1.   

Abstract

Two recent studies have shown a relationship between male height and number of offspring in contemporary developed-world populations. One of them argues as a result that directional selection for male tallness is both positive and unconstrained. This paper uses data from a large and socially representative national cohort of men who were born in Britain in March 1958. Taller men were less likely to be childless than shorter ones. They did not have a greater mean number of children. If anything, the pattern was the reverse, since men from higher socioeconomic groups tended to be taller and also to have smaller families. However, clear evidence was found that men who were taller than average were more likely to find a long-term partner, and also more likely to have several different long-term partners. This confirms the finding that tall men are considered more attractive and suggests that, in a noncontracepting environment, they would have more children. There is also evidence of stabilizing selection, since extremely tall men had an excess of health problems and an increased likelihood of childlessness. The conclusion is that male tallness has been selected for in recent human evolution but has been constrained by developmental factors and stabilizing selection on the extremely tall.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Height; Human evolution; Mate choice; Reproductive success

Year:  2002        PMID: 26193091     DOI: 10.1007/s12110-002-1004-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  18 in total

1.  The estimation of the heritability of anthropometric measurements.

Authors:  S Chatterjee; N Das; P Chatterjee
Journal:  Appl Human Sci       Date:  1999-01

2.  Fertility, physique, and intensity of selection.

Authors:  A Vetta
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 0.553

3.  Social background, adult body-height and health.

Authors:  K Silventoinen; E Lahelma; O Rahkonen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Height and mortality in the counties of England and Wales.

Authors:  D J Barker; C Osmond; J Golding
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.533

5.  Melanoma risk in relation to height, weight, and exercise (United States).

Authors:  A R Shors; C Solomon; A McTiernan; E White
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Height as a basis for interpersonal attraction.

Authors:  W E Hensley
Journal:  Adolescence       Date:  1994

7.  Genetic and environmental contributions to the association between body height and educational attainment: a study of adult Finnish twins.

Authors:  K Silventoinen; J Kaprio; E Lahelma
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Optimizing offspring: the quantity-quality tradeoff in agropastoral Kipsigis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.178

9.  Height and social mobility. A study of the height of 10 year olds in relation to socio-economic background and type of formal schooling.

Authors:  L Cernerud
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1995-03

10.  Determinants of sciatica and low-back pain.

Authors:  M Heliövaara; M Mäkelä; P Knekt; O Impivaara; A Aromaa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Adult height, nutrition, and population health.

Authors:  Jessica M Perkins; S V Subramanian; George Davey Smith; Emre Özaltin
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 7.110

2.  Waist-to-hip ratio versus body mass index as predictors of fitness in women.

Authors:  B Pawłowski; R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2005-06

3.  Height and reproductive success : How a Gambian population compares with the west.

Authors:  Rebecca Sear
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2006-12

4.  Body height and immune efficacy: testing body stature as a signal of biological quality.

Authors:  Bogusław Pawłowski; Judyta Nowak; Barbara Borkowska; Daria Augustyniak; Zuzanna Drulis-Kawa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  From preferred to actual mate characteristics: the case of human body shape.

Authors:  Alexandre Courtiol; Sandrine Picq; Bernard Godelle; Michel Raymond; Jean-Baptiste Ferdy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A test of the facultative calibration/reactive heritability model of extraversion.

Authors:  Hannah J Haysom; Dorian G Mitchem; Anthony J Lee; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; Matthew C Keller; Brendan P Zietsch
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.178

7.  Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness.

Authors:  Brian S Mautz; Bob B M Wong; Richard A Peters; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Why are some people left-handed? An evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  V Llaurens; M Raymond; C Faurie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; Anthony C Little
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  How humans differ from other animals in their levels of morphological variation.

Authors:  Ann E McKellar; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.