Literature DB >> 26181610

Height and reproductive success : How a Gambian population compares with the west.

Rebecca Sear1.   

Abstract

In Western societies, height is positively correlated with reproductive success (RS) for men but negatively correlated with RS for women. These relationships have been attributed to sexual selection: women prefer tall men, and men prefer short women. It is this success in the marriage market which leads to higher RS for tall men and short women. We have already shown that the relationship between height and RS for women is quite different in a non-Western context. In a subsistence farming community in rural Gambia, height is positively correlated with reproductive success for women, largely owing to the higher survival of the children of tall women. Here, the relationship between height and reproductive success is analyzed for men in the same community. For these Gambian men, there is no significant relationship between height and the number of children they produce, although tall men do contract more marriages than shorter men. We conclude that environmental context needs to be taken into account when analyzing human reproductive behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Height; Reproductive success; The Gambia

Year:  2006        PMID: 26181610     DOI: 10.1007/s12110-006-1003-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  24 in total

1.  Social background, adult body-height and health.

Authors:  K Silventoinen; E Lahelma; O Rahkonen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Socio-economic position and height in early adulthood.

Authors:  Gavin Turrell
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.939

3.  Height and mortality in the counties of England and Wales.

Authors:  D J Barker; C Osmond; J Golding
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.533

4.  Life-history theory, fertility and reproductive success in humans.

Authors:  Beverly I Strassmann; Brenda Gillespie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Human sexual dimorphism in size may be triggered by environmental cues.

Authors:  Satoshi Kanazawa; Deanna L Novak
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  2005-09

6.  Is health a sustainable state? A village study in The Gambia.

Authors:  L T Weaver; S Beckerleg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-05-22       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Height, weight and mortality. The Norwegian experience.

Authors:  H T Waaler
Journal:  Acta Med Scand Suppl       Date:  1984

8.  Marital protection and marital selection: evidence from a historical-prospective sample of American men.

Authors:  J E Murray
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2000-11

9.  Body shape and women's attractiveness : The critical role of waist-to-hip ratio.

Authors:  D Singh
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-09

10.  An evolutionary model of stature, age at first birth and reproductive success in Gambian women.

Authors:  N Allal; R Sear; A M Prentice; R Mace
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  12 in total

1.  How universal are human mate choices? Size does not matter when Hadza foragers are choosing a mate.

Authors:  Rebecca Sear; Frank W Marlowe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Sexual size dimorphism, canine dimorphism, and male-male competition in primates: where do humans fit in?

Authors:  J Michael Plavcan
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-03

Review 3.  Parental investment and the optimization of human family size.

Authors:  David W Lawson; Ruth Mace
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Body height and immune efficacy: testing body stature as a signal of biological quality.

Authors:  Bogusław Pawłowski; Judyta Nowak; Barbara Borkowska; Daria Augustyniak; Zuzanna Drulis-Kawa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; Anthony C Little
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Voice and handgrip strength predict reproductive success in a group of indigenous African females.

Authors:  Jeremy Atkinson; R Nathan Pipitone; Agnieszka Sorokowska; Piotr Sorokowski; Mara Mberira; Astrid Bartels; Gordon G Gallup
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A curvilinear effect of height on reproductive success in human males.

Authors:  Gert Stulp; Thomas V Pollet; Simon Verhulst; Abraham P Buunk
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  How humans differ from other animals in their levels of morphological variation.

Authors:  Ann E McKellar; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The life-history trade-off between fertility and child survival.

Authors:  David W Lawson; Alexandra Alvergne; Mhairi A Gibson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings?

Authors:  Gert Stulp; Abraham P Buunk; Thomas V Pollet; Daniel Nettle; Simon Verhulst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.