Literature DB >> 23569234

Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness.

Brian S Mautz1, Bob B M Wong, Richard A Peters, Michael D Jennions.   

Abstract

Compelling evidence from many animal taxa indicates that male genitalia are often under postcopulatory sexual selection for characteristics that increase a male's relative fertilization success. There could, however, also be direct precopulatory female mate choice based on male genital traits. Before clothing, the nonretractable human penis would have been conspicuous to potential mates. This observation has generated suggestions that human penis size partly evolved because of female choice. Here we show, based upon female assessment of digitally projected life-size, computer-generated images, that penis size interacts with body shape and height to determine male sexual attractiveness. Positive linear selection was detected for penis size, but the marginal increase in attractiveness eventually declined with greater penis size (i.e., quadratic selection). Penis size had a stronger effect on attractiveness in taller men than in shorter men. There was a similar increase in the positive effect of penis size on attractiveness with a more masculine body shape (i.e., greater shoulder-to-hip ratio). Surprisingly, larger penis size and greater height had almost equivalent positive effects on male attractiveness. Our results support the hypothesis that female mate choice could have driven the evolution of larger penises in humans. More broadly, our results show that precopulatory sexual selection can play a role in the evolution of genital traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23569234      PMCID: PMC3637716          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1219361110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  37 in total

1.  Tall men have more reproductive success.

Authors:  B Pawlowski; R I Dunbar; A Lipowicz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Characteristics of male attractiveness for women.

Authors:  D S Maisey; E L Vale; P L Cornelissen; M J Tovée
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Measuring nonlinear selection.

Authors:  Mark W Blows; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 4.  The use of multiple cues in mate choice.

Authors:  Ulrika Candolin
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2003-11

5.  Penile length and circumference: a study on 3,300 young Italian males.

Authors:  R Ponchietti; N Mondaini; M Bonafè; F Di Loro; S Biscioni; L Masieri
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  What importance do women attribute to the size of the penis?

Authors:  A B Francken; H B M van de Wiel; M F van Driel; W C M Weijmar Schultz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in height as a strategy for increasing the pool of potential partners in humans.

Authors:  Bogusław Pawłowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Trends in waist circumference among U.S. adults.

Authors:  Earl S Ford; Ali H Mokdad; Wayne H Giles
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2003-10

9.  Assortative mating by body height and BMI: Finnish twins and their spouses.

Authors:  Karri Silventoinen; Jaakko Kaprio; Eero Lahelma; Richard J Viken; Richard J Rose
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.937

10.  Penis size: Survey of female perceptions of sexual satisfaction.

Authors:  Russell Eisenman
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.809

View more
  12 in total

1.  Evolution of mate choice and the so-called magic traits in ecological speciation.

Authors:  Xavier Thibert-Plante; Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 2.  Mechanisms and Evidence of Genital Coevolution: The Roles of Natural Selection, Mate Choice, and Sexual Conflict.

Authors:  Patricia L R Brennan; Richard O Prum
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 3.  History and future perspectives of male aesthetic genital surgery.

Authors:  Claudia Zaccaro; David Subirà; Iñigo López-Diez; Celeste Manfredi; Julmar Paul Ascensios-Vargas; Ignacio Moncada-Iribarren
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  Low historical rates of cuckoldry in a Western European human population traced by Y-chromosome and genealogical data.

Authors:  M H D Larmuseau; J Vanoverbeke; A Van Geystelen; G Defraene; N Vanderheyden; K Matthys; T Wenseleers; R Decorte
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The effect of leg-to-body ratio on male attractiveness depends on the ecological validity of the figures.

Authors:  Thomas M M Versluys; William J Skylark
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Women's Preferences for Penis Size: A New Research Method Using Selection among 3D Models.

Authors:  Nicole Prause; Jaymie Park; Shannon Leung; Geoffrey Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Nutrition-dependent phenotypes affect sexual selection in a ladybird.

Authors:  Jiaqin Xie; Patrick De Clercq; Yuhong Zhang; Hongsheng Wu; Chang Pan; Hong Pang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Fitness consequences of artificial selection on relative male genital size.

Authors:  Isobel Booksmythe; Megan L Head; J Scott Keogh; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Why so many sperm cells? Not only a possible means of mitigating the hazards inherent to human reproduction but also an indicator of an exaptation.

Authors:  Peter W Barlow
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2016-07-15

10.  Hominid sexual nature.

Authors:  Christopher Mogielnicki; Katherine Pearl
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 1.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.