Literature DB >> 26189736

Colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy.

Kunio Kasugai1, Naotaka Ogasawara2, Makoto Sasaki2.   

Abstract

The goal of surveillance examinations after polypectomy is to detect new adenomas and missed synchronous adenomas, as well as preventing adenomas from becoming invasive or cancerous. The first colonoscopy surveillance program reported was the National Polyp Study from the United States in 1997, with an update in 2003. First screening colonoscopy and polypectomy have been shown to produce the greatest effects in reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients with adenomatous polyps. However, a large number of adenomas are being discovered as a result of the increased use of colorectal cancer screening, particularly with the dramatic increase in screening colonoscopy and surveillance. Increased efficiency of surveillance colonoscopy practices is therefore needed to decrease the cost, risk, and overuse of medical resources. In developing surveillance programs, studying miss rates and incidences and performing separate evaluations are important, along with accurately assessing incidence. This is because the recurrence rate or apparent incidence after colonoscopic polypectomy includes the true incidence of new polyp formation plus the incidence of missed polyps from the initial colonoscopy. Many studies have indicated the number of adenomas on initial examination as the most significant predictor for missed adenoma and incidence of adenoma on surveillance colonoscopy. In Japan, many facets of colonoscopic examination differ from those in Western countries. Further studies are recommended to establish an appropriate and original Japanese colonoscopy surveillance program for use after polypectomy, based on guidelines from the United States.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Incidence; Miss rates; Polypectomy; Surveillance

Year:  2011        PMID: 26189736     DOI: 10.1007/s12328-011-0246-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1865-7265


  68 in total

1.  Calculating the benefit of a negative endoscopy.

Authors:  Amnon Sonnenberg; David A Lieberman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Long-term efficacy of sigmoidoscopy in the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  Polly A Newcomb; Barry E Storer; Libby M Morimoto; Allyson Templeton; John D Potter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Robert H Fletcher; Jonathon S Stillman; Michael J O'Brien; Bernard Levin; Robert A Smith; David A Lieberman; Randall W Burt; Theodore R Levin; John H Bond; Durado Brooks; Tim Byers; Neil Hyman; Lynne Kirk; Alan Thorson; Clifford Simmang; David Johnson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  D K Rex; E Y Rahmani; J H Haseman; G T Lemmel; S Kaster; J S Buckley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Determination of factors responsible for the declining incidence of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R L Nelson; V Persky; M Turyk
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Vikram Boolchand; Gregory Olds; Joseph Singh; Pankaj Singh; Amitabh Chak; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Advances in endoscopic visualization of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  T M Yeung; N J Mortensen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates.

Authors:  Matthew Harrison; Navjot Singh; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  Colon polyps and cancer.

Authors:  J H Bond
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.093

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.