Literature DB >> 12697855

Long-term efficacy of sigmoidoscopy in the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence.

Polly A Newcomb1, Barry E Storer, Libby M Morimoto, Allyson Templeton, John D Potter.   

Abstract

Screening sigmoidoscopy is associated with a reduction in both the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Although current guidelines recommend sigmoidoscopy screening every 5 years, the duration of risk reduction is not known. We conducted a population-based case-control study to examine the association between sigmoidoscopy screening and colorectal cancer incidence. We collected information on screening history and risk factors from case patients with distal (n = 1026) and proximal (n = 642) colorectal cancer and from 1294 control subjects from October 1998 through February 2002. Screening sigmoidoscopy was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of distal colorectal cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.17 to 0.33). These reductions were sustained for up to 16 years with little attenuation. We also observed strong inverse associations between cancer incidence and sigmoidoscopy in analyses that included subjects with symptom-related tests. Current recommendations regarding the frequency of sigmoidoscopy screening may be unnecessarily aggressive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12697855     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/95.8.622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  42 in total

1.  Quantifying the potential benefit of sigmoidoscopic rescreening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Noel S Weiss; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Virtual colonoscopy vs optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Zhengrong Liang; Robert Richards
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2010-03-01

3.  How should individuals with a false-positive fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer be managed? A decision analysis.

Authors:  Ulrike Haug; Amy B Knudsen; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated?

Authors:  H Brenner; J Chang-Claude; C M Seiler; T Stürmer; M Hoffmeister
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Concerns and challenges in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening.

Authors:  Akeem O Adebogun; Christine D Berg; Adeyinka O Laiyemo
Journal:  Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2012-08

6.  Temporal trends in incidence and mortality rates for colorectal cancer by tumor location: 1975-2007.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; John Scoggins; Mary Anne Rossing; Christopher I Li; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; M Brian Fennerty; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Sachin Wani; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  Collaborative cancer epidemiology in the 21st century: the model of cancer consortia.

Authors:  Michael R Burgio; John P A Ioannidis; Brett M Kaminski; Eric Derycke; Scott Rogers; Muin J Khoury; Daniela Seminara
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04

10.  Effect of rising chemotherapy costs on the cost savings of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber; J Dik F Habbema; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.