Literature DB >> 17088578

Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians.

Vikram Boolchand1, Gregory Olds, Joseph Singh, Pankaj Singh, Amitabh Chak, Gregory S Cooper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recommendations by primary care physicians for colorectal screening after polypectomy will influence rates of colonoscopy in open-access systems that do not require consultation by a gastroenterologist before colonoscopy.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the surveillance recommendations of primary care physicians after polypectomy and compare them with recommendations from the U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of physicians.
SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 500 physicians from the American College of Physicians and 500 physicians from the American Academy of Family Physicians, obtained by using a mail survey. MEASUREMENTS: Physicians were asked when they would recommend repeated colonoscopy for a hypothetical 55-year-old man with no family history of colorectal cancer after the following 6 results on colonoscopy: hyperplastic polyp, one 6-mm tubular adenoma, two 6-mm tubular adenomas, one 12-mm tubulovillous adenoma, one 12-mm tubular adenoma with focal high-grade dysplasia, and no polyp but a previous tubular adenoma.
RESULTS: The overall response rate was 57% (568 physicians). Of the respondents, 48% were internists and 52% were family practitioners. Sixty-one percent of respondents would survey a hyperplastic polyp in 5 years or less, 71% would survey a single tubular adenoma in 3 years or less, and 80% would survey 2 tubular adenomas in 3 years or less. LIMITATIONS: The results are based on physicians' self-reported practices from clinical vignettes and may not match actual practice.
CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians recommend postpolypectomy colonoscopic surveillance more frequently than is recommended by practice guidelines, especially if the colonoscopy showed a hyperplastic polyp or a single small adenoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17088578     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-9-200611070-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  43 in total

1.  Factors associated with adherence to the recommended postpolypectomy surveillance interval.

Authors:  Eun Ran Kim; Dong Hyun Sinn; Jin Yong Kim; Dong Kyung Chang; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jae J Kim; Jong Chul Rhee; Young-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Concerns and challenges in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening.

Authors:  Akeem O Adebogun; Christine D Berg; Adeyinka O Laiyemo
Journal:  Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2012-08

3.  Attitude of the Italian general population towards prevention and screening of the most common tumors, with special emphasis on colorectal malignancies.

Authors:  Federica Domati; Estratios Travlos; Claudia Cirilli; Giuseppina Rossi; Piero Benatti; Massimiliano Marino; Giovanni Ponti; Maria Vandelli; Simone Valmori; Amal Oursana; Annalisa Pezzi; Maurizio Ponz de Leon
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  How can the over-use of surveillance colonoscopy after polypectomy be modified?

Authors:  Sung Pil Hong; Won Ho Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Overuse of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Gina R Kruse; Sami M Khan; Alan M Zaslavsky; John Z Ayanian; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Repeat colonoscopy after a colonoscopy with a negative result in Ontario: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lieke Hol; Rinku Sutradhar; Sumei Gu; Nancy N Baxter; Linda Rabeneck; Jill M Tinmouth; Lawrence F Paszat
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

7.  Adenoma detection in excellent versus good bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Danielle M Tholey; Corbett E Shelton; Gloria Francis; Archana Anantharaman; Robert A Frankel; Paurush Shah; Amy Coan; Sarah E Hegarty; Benjamin E Leiby; David M Kastenberg
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  Physician reminders to promote surveillance colonoscopy for colorectal adenomas: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John Z Ayanian; Thomas D Sequist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Richard S Johannes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  One-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia: U.S. versus U.K. risk-stratification guidelines.

Authors:  María Elena Martínez; Patricia Thompson; Karen Messer; Erin L Ashbeck; David A Lieberman; John A Baron; Dennis J Ahnen; Douglas J Robertson; Elizabeth T Jacobs; E Robert Greenberg; Amanda J Cross; Wendy Atkin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Improving the quality of colorectal cancer screening: assessment of familial risk.

Authors:  Lynn F Butterly; Martha Goodrich; Tracy Onega; Mary Ann Greene; Amitabh Srivastava; Randall Burt; Allen Dietrich
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.