Literature DB >> 12510223

Colon polyps and cancer.

J H Bond1.   

Abstract

A large number of studies published last year in peer-reviewed medical journals help to better define the advantages and limitations of the different options for colorectal cancer screening. Direct colonoscopy screening appears to have the greatest potential to markedly reduce both the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer, but many obstacles limiting its widespread use in the general at-risk population still exist, and many questions remain incompletely answered. Recent studies stress the fact that finding and resecting advanced adenomatous polyps, and thereby preventing cancer, is becoming a primary objective of screening programs. Several papers also show the potential of emerging new methods of screening for specific markers in stool and for imaging the colon with computed-tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Other important publications highlighted in this review deal with the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia, familial colorectal cancer, colorectal polyps and the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, and new and novel methods of improving the efficiency and safety of colonoscopic polypectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12510223     DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-36410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  16 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  R Scott Nelson; Alan G Thorson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Importance of reporting segmental bowel preparation scores during colonoscopy in clinical practice.

Authors:  Deepanshu Jain; Mojdeh Momeni; Mahesh Krishnaiah; Sury Anand; Shashideep Singhal
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy.

Authors:  Kunio Kasugai; Naotaka Ogasawara; Makoto Sasaki
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-16

4.  Family history assessment to detect increased risk for colorectal cancer: conceptual considerations and a preliminary economic analysis.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; Wylie Burke; Linda Pinsky; Lauren Clarke; Polly Newcomb; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Colonoscopy as a tool for evaluating colorectal tumor development in a mouse model.

Authors:  Tomohiro Adachi; Takao Hinoi; Yuu Sasaki; Hiroaki Niitsu; Yasuhumi Saito; Masashi Miguchi; Manabu Shimomura; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  APC and its modifiers in colon cancer.

Authors:  Lawrence N Kwong; William F Dove
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 7.  [Oncologic screening with whole-body MRI: possibilities and limitations].

Authors:  J F Schäfer; A Fischmann; M Lichy; J Vollmar; M Fenchel; C D Claussen; H-P Schlemmer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Colon Capsule Endoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps: An Economic Analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Palimaka; Gord Blackhouse; Ron Goeree
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2015-07-01

Review 9.  Colon Capsule Endoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2015-07-01

10.  Intact and cleaved forms of the urokinase receptor enhance discrimination of cancer from non-malignant conditions in patients presenting with symptoms related to colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A F Lomholt; G Høyer-Hansen; H J Nielsen; I J Christensen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.