Literature DB >> 26188659

US characteristics for the prediction of neoplasm in gallbladder polyps 10 mm or larger.

Jin Sil Kim1, Jeong Kyong Lee2, Yookyung Kim1, Sang Min Lee1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the characteristics of gallbladder polyps 10 mm or larger to predict a neoplasm in US examinations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients with gallbladder polyps ≥ 10 mm with follow-up images or pathologic diagnosis were included in the retrospective study. All images and reports were reviewed to determine the imaging characteristics of gallbladder polyps. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate predictors for a neoplastic polyp.
RESULTS: A neoplastic polyp was verified in 12 of 53 patients and the mean size was 13.9 mm. The univariate analysis revealed that adjacent gallbladder wall thickening, larger size (≥15 mm), older age (≥57 years), absence of hyperechoic foci in a polyp, CT visibility, sessile shape, a solitary polyp, and an irregular surface were significant predictors for a neoplastic polyp. In the multivariate analysis, larger size (≥15 mm) was a significant predictor for a neoplastic polyp.
CONCLUSION: A polyp size ≥15 mm was the strongest predictor for a neoplastic polyp with US. The hyperechoic foci in a polyp and CT visibility would be useful indicators for the differentiation of a neoplastic polyp, in addition to the established predictors. KEY POINTS: • A polyp size ≥15 mm is the strongest predictor for a neoplastic polyp with US. • Hyperechoic foci in a polyp and CT visibility are new predictors. • The rate of malignancy is low in polyps even 10 mm or larger (15.1 %).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Gallbladder; Gallbladder neoplasms; Polyps; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26188659     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3910-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  20 in total

1.  Prevalence of gallbladder polyps among apparently healthy Japanese: ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  K Segawa; T Arisawa; Y Niwa; T Suzuki; Y Tsukamoto; H Goto; E Hamajima; M Shimodaira; N Ohmiya
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Differentiation of nonneoplastic and neoplastic gallbladder polyps 1 cm or bigger with multi-detector row computed tomography.

Authors:  Ko Woon Park; Seong Hyun Kim; Seong Ho Choi; Won Jae Lee
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Gallbladder polyps: factors affecting surgical decision.

Authors:  Pinar Sarkut; Sadik Kilicturgay; Ali Ozer; Ersin Ozturk; Tuncay Yilmazlar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps: is follow-up necessary?--Long-term clinical and US analysis of 346 patients.

Authors:  Michael T Corwin; Bettina Siewert; Robert G Sheiman; Robert A Kane
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder.

Authors:  Kit Fai Lee; John Wong; Jimmy Chak Man Li; Paul Bo San Lai
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Differential diagnosis of small polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: the value of endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  M Sugiyama; X Y Xie; Y Atomi; M Saito
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Risk and Cost-effectiveness of Surveillance Followed by Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Polyps.

Authors:  Vaux Cairns; Christopher P Neal; Ashely R Dennison; Giuseppe Garcea
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-12

Review 8.  Gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Stavros Gourgiotis; Hemant M Kocher; Leonardo Solaini; Arvin Yarollahi; Evangelos Tsiambas; Nikolaos S Salemis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Polyp on ultrasound: now what? The association between gallbladder polyps and cancer.

Authors:  Graham Donald; Dharma Sunjaya; Timothy Donahue; O Joe Hines
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.688

10.  Diagnosis and management of gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Ake Andrén-Sandberg
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2012-07
View more
  3 in total

1.  Risk stratification of gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm using high-resolution ultrasonography and texture analysis.

Authors:  Tae Won Choi; Jung Hoon Kim; Sang Joon Park; Su Joa Ahn; Ijin Joo; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE.

Authors:  Kieran G Foley; Max J Lahaye; Ruedi F Thoeni; Marek Soltes; Catherine Dewhurst; Sorin Traian Barbu; Yogesh K Vashist; Søren Rafael Rafaelsen; Marianna Arvanitakis; Julie Perinel; Rebecca Wiles; Stuart Ashley Roberts
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 3.  Transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of gallbladder polyps.

Authors:  Sarah Z Wennmacker; Mark P Lamberts; Marcello Di Martino; Joost Ph Drenth; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Cornelis Jhm van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.