Literature DB >> 20697115

Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps: is follow-up necessary?--Long-term clinical and US analysis of 346 patients.

Michael T Corwin1, Bettina Siewert, Robert G Sheiman, Robert A Kane.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the natural history of gallbladder (GB) polyps incidentally detected at ultrasonography (US) and to propose management guidelines for these lesions based on polyp size.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was waived. A database search for "polyp" in all US examinations of the GB between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2001, at a single institution was performed. All subsequent US reports were reviewed to determine changes in GB polyp size. The electronic medical record was searched to obtain clinical and pathologic follow-up.
RESULTS: Three hundred forty-six patients (mean age, 51.6 years; range, 20-93 years) with GB polyps were included. There were 156 men (45%) and 190 women (55%). US follow-up (mean, 5.4 years; range, 2-11.5 years) was performed in 149 patients (43%). Polyp size was stable in 90 (60%) polyps, decreased in eight (5%), increased in one (1%), and resolved in 50 (34%). Forty-two patients (12%) underwent cholecystectomy, revealing 13 (31%) GBs with polypoid lesions, 24 (57%) with stones and no polyps, and five (12%) with neither a stone nor a polypoid lesion. Clinical follow-up (mean, 8 years; range, 5-10.4 years) was performed in 155 patients (45%). No patient had clinical evidence of GB-related disease. Overall, no cases of GB malignancy were identified in 346 patients. Mean polyp size was 5.0 mm (range, 1-18 mm). No neoplastic polyps were found at 1-6 mm, one neoplastic polyp was seen at 7-9 mm, and two neoplastic polyps were found at 10 mm or larger.
CONCLUSION: The risk of GB malignancy resulting from incidentally detected polyps is extremely low. Incidentally detected GB polyps measuring 6 mm or less may require no additional follow-up. Data are inconclusive regarding polyps 7 mm or greater, and further studies are warranted. © RSNA, 2010

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20697115     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  17 in total

1.  The diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography needs to be considered when managing gallbladder polyps.

Authors:  Daniel G French; Philippe D Allen; James C Ellsmere
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Is cholecystectomy a reasonable treatment option for simple gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm?

Authors:  Hye Yon Park; Se Hoon Oh; Kwang Hyuck Lee; Jong Kyun Lee; Kyu Taek Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Differential diagnosis between gallbladder adenomas and cholesterol polyps on contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  Chan Hyuk Park; Moon Jae Chung; Tak Geun Oh; Jeong Youp Park; Seungmin Bang; Seung Woo Park; Hyunki Kim; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Woo Jung Lee; Si Young Song
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Neuroendocrine tumors of the gallbladder: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Silvia Mezi; Vincenzo Petrozza; Orazio Schillaci; Valentina La Torre; Barbara Cimadon; Martina Leopizzi; Errico Orsi; Filippo La Torre
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2011-07-29

5.  Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: analysis of 1204 patients with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Shu-Cheng Chou; Shih-Chin Chen; Yi-Ming Shyr; Shin-E Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  US characteristics for the prediction of neoplasm in gallbladder polyps 10 mm or larger.

Authors:  Jin Sil Kim; Jeong Kyong Lee; Yookyung Kim; Sang Min Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The efficacy of real-time colour Doppler flow imaging on endoscopic ultrasonography for differential diagnosis between neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps.

Authors:  Su Young Kim; Jae Hee Cho; Eui Joo Kim; Dong Hae Chung; Kun Kuk Kim; Yeon Ho Park; Yeon Suk Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Modern perspectives on factors predisposing to the development of gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Charles H C Pilgrim; Ryan T Groeschl; Kathleen K Christians; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Analysis of gallbladder polypoid lesion size as an indication of the risk of gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Ji Eun Sung; Chang Woo Nam; Yang Won Nah; Byung Sung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2014-02-24

10.  Carcinoma in situ in a 7 mm gallbladder polyp: Time to change current practice?

Authors:  David Kasle; Amir A Rahnemai-Azar; Shahida Bibi; Vinaya Gaduputi; Brian F Gilchrist; Daniel T Farkas
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.