Literature DB >> 22911224

Risk and Cost-effectiveness of Surveillance Followed by Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Polyps.

Vaux Cairns, Christopher P Neal, Ashely R Dennison, Giuseppe Garcea.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To ascertain the best management options for patients presenting with gallbladder polyps. DESIGN Retrospective case-note analysis. SETTING Tertiary referral teaching hospital practice. PATIENTS Patients with ultrasonography-detected gallbladder polyps. INTERVENTIONS Ultrasonography surveillance or surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Demographic data and size and number of polyps were recorded as well as size increase and histological findings. Detection rates for potentially neoplastic and frankly neoplastic polyps were recorded and compared with complication rates from cholecystectomy. Cost-effectiveness of ultrasonography surveillance was examined. RESULTS Nine hundred eighty-six patients were identified and 467 patients underwent further follow-up. Only 6.6% of polyps exhibited an increase in size over the surveillance period. Polyps that subsequently progressed in size on surveillance had a significantly greater diameter at first presentation than those polyps that remained static (7 mm vs 5 mm, respectively) (P < .05). Only 3.7% of resected polyps had malignant or potentially malignant histology. Size greater than 10 mm and increase in size during surveillance predicted neoplastic potential. CONCLUSIONS A surveillance with or without selective surgery policy could potentially detect and prevent 5.4 gallbladder cancers per 1000 individuals per year with a cost saving of more than £130 000 (US $201 676) per year. Cancer prevention benefits would exceed the risk ratios from cholecystectomy complications. Polyps greater than 10 mm should be resected; those between 5 and 10 mm should be under ultrasonography surveillance.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22911224     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  10 in total

1.  Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: analysis of 1204 patients with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Shu-Cheng Chou; Shih-Chin Chen; Yi-Ming Shyr; Shin-E Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  US characteristics for the prediction of neoplasm in gallbladder polyps 10 mm or larger.

Authors:  Jin Sil Kim; Jeong Kyong Lee; Yookyung Kim; Sang Min Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Management and diagnosis of gallbladder polyps: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benoy I Babu; Ashley R Dennison; Giuseppe Garcea
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Neoplastic polyps in gallbladder: a retrospective study to determine risk factors and treatment strategy for gallbladder polyps.

Authors:  Yongliang Sun; Zhiying Yang; Xu Lan; Haidong Tan
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Incidental non-benign gallbladder histopathology after cholecystectomy in an United Kingdom population: Need for routine histological analysis?

Authors:  Krashna Patel; Khaled Dajani; Satheesh Iype; Nikolaos A Chatzizacharias; Saranya Vickramarajah; Prateush Singh; Susan Davies; Rebecca Brais; Siong S Liau; Simon Harper; Asif Jah; Raaj K Praseedom; Emmanuel L Huguet
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-10-27

6.  Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE.

Authors:  Kieran G Foley; Max J Lahaye; Ruedi F Thoeni; Marek Soltes; Catherine Dewhurst; Sorin Traian Barbu; Yogesh K Vashist; Søren Rafael Rafaelsen; Marianna Arvanitakis; Julie Perinel; Rebecca Wiles; Stuart Ashley Roberts
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 7.034

7.  Gallbladder Polyp and Cancer Evaluation After Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Ahmet Alyanak; Ferit Aslan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-17

8.  Gallbladder polyps growth rate is an independent risk factor for neoplastic polyps.

Authors:  Ji Won Han; Young Hoon Choi; In Seok Lee; Ho Joong Choi; Tae Ho Hong; Young Kyoung You
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 6.866

Review 9.  Transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of gallbladder polyps.

Authors:  Sarah Z Wennmacker; Mark P Lamberts; Marcello Di Martino; Joost Ph Drenth; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Cornelis Jhm van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-15

10.  Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps : Joint guidelines between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery - European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE).

Authors:  Rebecca Wiles; Ruedi F Thoeni; Sorin Traian Barbu; Yogesh K Vashist; Søren Rafael Rafaelsen; Catherine Dewhurst; Marianna Arvanitakis; Max Lahaye; Marek Soltes; Julie Perinel; Stuart Ashley Roberts
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.