Literature DB >> 26915082

Segmentation of joint and musculoskeletal tissue in the study of arthritis.

Valentina Pedoia1, Sharmila Majumdar2, Thomas M Link2.   

Abstract

As the most frequent cause of physical disability, musculoskeletal diseases such as arthritis and osteoporosis have a great social and economical impact. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers are important tools that allow clinicians to better characterize, monitor, and even predict musculoskeletal disease progression. Post-processing pipelines often include image segmentation. Manually identifying the border of the region of interest (ROI) is a difficult and time-consuming task. Manual segmentation is also affected by inter- and intrauser variability, thus limiting standardization. Fully automatic or semi-automatic methods that minimize the user interaction are highly desirable. Unfortunately, an ultimate, highly reliable and extensively evaluated solution for joint and musculoskeletal tissue segmentation has not yet been proposed, and many clinical studies still adopt fully manual procedures. Moreover, the clinical translation of several promising quantitative MRI techniques is highly affected by the lack of an established, fast, and accurate segmentation method. The goal of this review is to present some of the techniques proposed in recent literature that have been adopted in clinical studies for joint and musculoskeletal tissue analyses in arthritis patients. The most widely used MRI sequences and image processing algorithms employed to accomplish segmentation challenges will be discussed in this paper.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip; Image segmentation; Knee; MRI; Osteoarthritis; Rheumatoid arthritis; Wrist

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26915082      PMCID: PMC7181410          DOI: 10.1007/s10334-016-0532-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  63 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based three-dimensional bone shape of the knee predicts onset of knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Tuhina Neogi; Michael A Bowes; Jingbo Niu; Kevin M De Souza; Graham R Vincent; Joyce Goggins; Yuqing Zhang; David T Felson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2013-08

2.  Femoral cartilage segmentation in knee MRI scans using two stage voxel classification.

Authors:  Adhish Prasoon; Christian Igel; Marco Loog; Francois Lauze; Erik B Dam; Mads Nielsen
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

3.  Quantitative characterization of bone marrow edema pattern in rheumatoid arthritis using 3 Tesla MRI.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Li; Andrew Yu; Warapat Virayavanich; Susan M Noworolski; Thomas M Link; John Imboden
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  AUTOMATIC MULTI-ATLAS-BASED CARTILAGE SEGMENTATION FROM KNEE MR IMAGES.

Authors:  Liang Shan; Cecil Charles; Marc Niethammer
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2012-12-31

5.  Variability of CubeQuant T1ρ, quantitative DESS T2, and cones sodium MRI in knee cartilage.

Authors:  C D Jordan; E J McWalter; U D Monu; R D Watkins; W Chen; N K Bangerter; B A Hargreaves; G E Gold
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 6.  The diagnostic performance of MRI in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Menashe; K Hirko; E Losina; M Kloppenburg; W Zhang; L Li; D J Hunter
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 7.  State of the art survey on MRI brain tumor segmentation.

Authors:  Nelly Gordillo; Eduard Montseny; Pilar Sobrevilla
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  MR measurement of articular cartilage thickness distribution in the hip.

Authors:  J H Naish; E Xanthopoulos; C E Hutchinson; J C Waterton; C J Taylor
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Three-dimensional MRI-based statistical shape model and application to a cohort of knees with acute ACL injury.

Authors:  V Pedoia; D A Lansdown; M Zaid; C E McCulloch; R Souza; C B Ma; X Li
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 10.  Machines that learn to segment images: a crucial technology for connectomics.

Authors:  Viren Jain; H Sebastian Seung; Srinivas C Turaga
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  19 in total

1.  Deep convolutional neural network and 3D deformable approach for tissue segmentation in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Zhaoye Zhou; Hyungseok Jang; Alexey Samsonov; Gengyan Zhao; Richard Kijowski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Current applications and future directions of deep learning in musculoskeletal radiology.

Authors:  Pauley Chea; Jacob C Mandell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Current Applications and Future Impact of Machine Learning in Radiology.

Authors:  Garry Choy; Omid Khalilzadeh; Mark Michalski; Synho Do; Anthony E Samir; Oleg S Pianykh; J Raymond Geis; Pari V Pandharipande; James A Brink; Keith J Dreyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Knee menisci segmentation and relaxometry of 3D ultrashort echo time cones MR imaging using attention U-Net with transfer learning.

Authors:  Michal Byra; Mei Wu; Xiaodong Zhang; Hyungseok Jang; Ya-Jun Ma; Eric Y Chang; Sameer Shah; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Tissue segmentation: a crucial tool for quantitative MRI and visualization of anatomical structures.

Authors:  Fritz Schick
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Inter- and intra-observer variability of an anatomical landmark-based, manual segmentation method by MRI for the assessment of skeletal muscle fat content and area in subjects from the general population.

Authors:  Lena Sophie Kiefer; Jana Fabian; Roberto Lorbeer; Jürgen Machann; Corinna Storz; Mareen Sarah Kraus; Elke Wintermeyer; Christopher Schlett; Frank Roemer; Konstantin Nikolaou; Annette Peters; Fabian Bamberg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence in Musculoskeletal Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Soterios Gyftopoulos; Dana Lin; Florian Knoll; Ankur M Doshi; Tatiane Cantarelli Rodrigues; Michael P Recht
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Diagnostic and Gradation Model of Osteoporosis Based on Improved Deep U-Net Network.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Jian Wang; Weiwei Ruan; Chengshan Lin; Daguo Chen
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  An Open-Source, Vender Agnostic Hardware and Software Pipeline for Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology Workflow.

Authors:  Jae Ho Sohn; Yeshwant Reddy Chillakuru; Stanley Lee; Amie Y Lee; Tatiana Kelil; Christopher Paul Hess; Youngho Seo; Thienkhai Vu; Bonnie N Joe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Longitudinal study using voxel-based relaxometry: Association between cartilage T and T2 and patient reported outcome changes in hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Valentina Pedoia; Matthew C Gallo; Richard B Souza; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.