Fan Shi1, Aaron M Coffey2, Kevin W Waddell3, Eduard Y Chekmenev4, Boyd M Goodson5. 1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901. 2. Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, United States ; Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, United States. 3. Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, United States ; Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, United States ; Department of Physics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, United States. 4. Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, United States ; Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, United States ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, United States ; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (VICC), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, United States ; Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, United States. 5. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901 ; Materials Technology Center, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, United States.
Abstract
Two types of nanoscale catalysts were created to explore NMR signal enhancement via reversible exchange (SABRE) at the interface between heterogeneous and homogeneous conditions. Nanoparticle and polymer comb variants were synthesized by covalently tethering Ir-based organometallic catalysts to support materials comprised of TiO2/PMAA (poly methacrylic acid) and PVP (polyvinyl pyridine), respectively, and characterized by AAS, NMR, and DLS. Following parahydrogen (pH2) gas delivery to mixtures containing one type of "nano-SABRE" catalyst particles, a target substrate, and ethanol, up to ~(-)40-fold and ~(-)7-fold 1H NMR signal enhancements were observed for pyridine substrates using the nanoparticle and polymer comb catalysts, respectively, following transfer to high field (9.4 T). These enhancements appear to result from intact particles and not from any catalyst molecules leaching from their supports; unlike the case with homogeneous SABRE catalysts, high-field (in situ) SABRE effects were generally not observed with the nanoscale catalysts. The potential for separation and reuse of such catalyst particles is also demonstrated. Taken together, these results support the potential utility of rational design at molecular, mesoscopic, and macroscopic/engineering levels for improving SABRE and HET-SABRE (heterogeneous-SABRE) for applications varying from fundamental studies of catalysis to biomedical imaging.
Two types of nanoscale catalysts were created to explore NMR signal enhancement via reversible exchange (SABRE) at the interface between heterogeneous and homogeneous conditions. Nanoparticle and polymer comb variants were synthesized by covalently tethering Ir-based organometallic catalysts to support materials comprised of TiO2/PMAA (poly methacrylic acid) and PVP (polyvinyl pyridine), respectively, and characterized by AAS, NMR, and DLS. Following parahydrogen (pH2) gas delivery to mixtures containing one type of "nano-SABRE" catalyst particles, a target substrate, and ethanol, up to ~(-)40-fold and ~(-)7-fold 1H NMR signal enhancements were observed for pyridine substrates using the nanoparticle and polymer comb catalysts, respectively, following transfer to high field (9.4 T). These enhancements appear to result from intact particles and not from any catalyst molecules leaching from their supports; unlike the case with homogeneous SABRE catalysts, high-field (in situ) SABRE effects were generally not observed with the nanoscale catalysts. The potential for separation and reuse of such catalyst particles is also demonstrated. Taken together, these results support the potential utility of rational design at molecular, mesoscopic, and macroscopic/engineering levels for improving SABRE and HET-SABRE (heterogeneous-SABRE) for applications varying from fundamental studies of catalysis to biomedical imaging.
Conventional
NMR and MRI suffer from low detection sensitivity,
owing in large part to the weak (∼10–4–10–6) equilibrium nuclear spin polarization attained even
in the strongest available magnets. However, in a growing number of
systems, hyperpolarization has been shown capable of transiently elevating
the nuclear spin polarization far above its thermal equilibrium value.
The corresponding increases in NMR detection sensitivity[1−6] have enabled access to a range of previously inaccessible experiments
from in vivo imaging and spectroscopy of low-concentration
species,[6,7] to studies of surfaces,[8] proteins,[2,9,10] and
catalysis,[3] to low-field[11,12] and remotely detected[13,14] NMR and MRI. Such NMR
hyperpolarization techniques include spin-exchange optical pumping
(SEOP) of noble gases[5,15] and semiconductors,[16,17] dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP),[18−20] chemically[21] and photochemically induced DNP,[2,3,22] and optical nuclear polarization,[23,24] among many others.Whereas most hyperpolarization methods
rely on polarization transfer
from unpaired electron spins, parahydrogen (pH2)-based
approaches harness the pure singlet spin state of parahydrogen (pH2) as the source of nuclear spin order.[4] Conventional parahydrogen-induced polarization (PHIP)[25−27] involves concerted hydrogenation of pH2 across asymmetric
unsaturated bonds,[28] allowing hyperpolarization
to be manifested by nascent magnetically inequivalent 1H pairs or in longer-lived adjacent heteronuclear sites.[4,29−35] A promising new PHIP-based approach called signal amplification
by reversible exchange (SABRE) was recently pioneered by Duckett and
co-workers:[36,37] Like conventional PHIP, SABRE
utilizes an organometallic catalyst to colocate pH2 and
the target molecule to be hyperpolarized. However, SABRE does not
require irreversible alteration of unsaturated precursor molecules;
instead, spin order is transferred via spin–spin couplings
from transiently bound pH2 to target molecules during the
lifetime of the complex.[4] Although polarization
values achieved via SABRE have generally been lower than those attained
via other modalities, SABRE is cost-effective, potentially continuous,
and scalable. In addition to achieving 1H polarizations
of several percent,[37] recent progress has
included studies of different catalysts and reaction conditions,[38,39] low-field spectroscopy and imaging,[40,41,12] enhancement of biomedically relevant substrates[42] (including in water-containing[43−45] and purely aqueous environments[45]), in situ high-field SABRE[45,46] (enhanced
via the application of novel pulse sequences[47,48]), and the creation of 10% polarization on heteronuclear (15N) spins via SABRE in microtesla fields.[49]An additional complication for many applications of hyperpolarization
is the need to separate the hyperpolarized (HP) agents from auxiliary
substances prior to agent use. Such substances—including alkali
metals for SEOP,[5,15] radicals for DNP,[18] and catalysts for PHIP/SABRE[4,36−39]—are often required to mediate the hyperpolarization process
but may also be expensive, toxic, or otherwise incompatible with the
experiment. For example, the vastly different physical properties
of alkali metals and noble gases enable facile agent separation in
SEOP;[50−52] in Overhauser DNP, radicals can be immobilized on
beds through which target substances flow during hyperpolarization.[20,53] In the context of PHIP, Koptyug and co-workers have shown that separable
heterogeneous catalysts such as supported metal nanoparticles, despite
their expected reliance on nonmolecular hydrogenation mechanisms,
can actually lead to a significant fraction of reactions to proceed
through effectively “pairwise” addition of pH2—permitting pure HP products to be obtained.[54−58] Following in these efforts, SABRE under conditions of heterogeneous
catalysis (“HET-SABRE”) was recently demonstrated utilizing
a variant of the standard Ir-based NHC-SABRE catalyst immobilized
on solid supports (microscale polymer beads).[59] Although the resulting NMR enhancements were modest (up to |ε|
∼ 5 at 9.4 T), the catalysts were easily separated from the
supernatant liquid and the results demonstrated the general feasibility
of the approach while highlighting areas for future improvement.A common approach in heterogeneous catalysis is to improve the
efficiency of catalysts and increase the effective concentration of
solvent-accessible, catalytically active sites through rational design
(e.g., by increasing the surface-area-to-volume ratio).[60−64] Thus, in the present work two new SABRE catalysts were synthesized
with nanoscale dimensions by tethering variants of Ir-based NHC organometallic
catalysts to TiO2/PMAA (poly(methacrylic acid)) core/shell
nanoparticles and PVP (polyvinylpyridine) “comb” polymers,
respectively, in order to investigate the possibility of improved
SABRE enhancement. Up to |ε| ∼ 40-fold and ∼7-fold 1H NMR signal enhancements were observed for pyridine substrates
using the nanoparticle and polymer comb catalyst supports, respectively,
following transfer to a 9.4 T NMR magnet. The enhancements are consistent
with HET-SABRE from intact nanoscale catalysts, and the catalyst properties
are further distinguished from those of homogeneous SABRE by the absence
of in situ high-field SABRE effects; the feasibility
of HET-SABRE catalyst separation and reuse is also demonstrated. Taken
together, these results support the potential utility of rational
catalyst design for improving HET-SABRE for a wide range of NMR/MRI
applications.
Experimental Approach
Synthesis of TiO2/PMAA core/shell nanoparticle SABRE
catalysts is summarized in Figure 1; additional
details concerning SABRE catalyst syntheses and characterization are
provided in the Supporting Information.
TiO2 cores were chosen not only because they present an
easy-to-prepare form of nanoscale supports but also because they are
nonmagnetic and catalytic (facilitating shell formation). The procedure
for synthesizing the TiO2 cores was adapted from a related
approach in ref.[65] In step 1, titanium
hydroxide is prepared from titanium isopropoxide and water under ambient
conditions; Ti(OH)4 will further undergo dehydration condensation
(step 2) to form the nanoscale TiO2 cores. Catalyzed by
TiO2, methacrylic acid separately undergoes a polymerization
(step 3) procedure to give PMAA; the resulting PMAA chains were covalently
attached to the TiO2 nanoparticle surfaces, thereby generating
an outer shell layer (step 4). The PMAA shells were then functionalized
with 4-aminopyridine (step 5) under mild conditions without need for
any additional catalysts (as opposed to more traditional methods using
organic solvents and higher temperatures[66,67]). Separately (step 6), the N-heterocycliccarbene complex-based
Ir catalyst [abbreviated as IrCl(COD)(IMes)][68]—the standard catalyst used in most homogeneous SABRE experiments[4,37,39,41−46,48,69]—was synthesized according to previously described procedures.[59,68] Then, following the approach utilized in our original HET-SABRE
catalyst synthesis[59,70] (inspired by ref (71)), the above homogeneous
catalyst was primed for addition to the solid support (step 7) by
reaction with AgPF6 in THF under an Ar atmosphere; AgCl
precipitation provides the driving force for Cl– abstraction. The previously prepared surface-modified TiO2/PMAA core–shell nanoparticles were added to the solution
within a glovebox (step 8) to yield the completed SABRE nanoparticle
catalysts (NPCs).
Figure 1
Summary of synthetic steps for the preparation of the
TiO2/PMAA nanoparticle SABRE catalysts (NPCs). The ratio
of aminopyridine/catalyst
moieties to polymer strands is expected to be ∼1:1; the final
structure is depicted with one possible configuration, with the catalyst
moiety bound to a terminal aminopyridine group; aminopyridine/catalyst
moieties may also functionalize repeat units. Bare TiO2 NPs, NPs coated/infused with PMAA, and final functionalized NPCs
are shown in gray, light blue, and orange/red, respectively. Components
are not drawn to scale.
Summary of synthetic steps for the preparation of the
TiO2/PMAA nanoparticle SABRE catalysts (NPCs). The ratio
of aminopyridine/catalyst
moieties to polymer strands is expected to be ∼1:1; the final
structure is depicted with one possible configuration, with the catalyst
moiety bound to a terminal aminopyridine group; aminopyridine/catalyst
moieties may also functionalize repeat units. Bare TiO2 NPs, NPs coated/infused with PMAA, and final functionalized NPCs
are shown in gray, light blue, and orange/red, respectively. Components
are not drawn to scale.Synthesis of PVPpolymer comb SABRE catalysts is summarized
in
Figure 2. The same [IrCl(COD)(IMes)] homogeneous
SABRE catalyst was synthesized, and its Cl– moiety
was eliminated as described above. Commercial PVPpolymer combs were
suspended in ethanol and reacted with the primed (Cl-abstracted) Ir
SABRE catalyst within a glovebox to enable covalent linking of the
Ir catalytic moieties to the polymer comb support structures. The
polymer suspension was dried in the open air prior to characterization
to give the final polyvinylpyridine catalysts (PVPCs).
Figure 2
Summary of the synthesis
of the PVP comb polymer SABRE catalysts
(PVPCs), shown structurally (top) and schematically (bottom). Components
are not drawn to scale.
Summary of the synthesis
of the PVP comb polymer SABRE catalysts
(PVPCs), shown structurally (top) and schematically (bottom). Components
are not drawn to scale.
Catalyst Characterization
Successful immobilization
of the Ir complex onto the TiO2/PMAA core/shell NPs and
the polymer combs was supported by NMR, AAS, and DLS experiments (see Supporting Information). A strong Ir signal from
the intact particles indicated the presence (and hence successful
linkage) of Ir on the NPs; according to an estimate based on the AAS
results, the Ir complex comprises roughly 25% of the total nano-SABRE
catalyst particles by weight. AAS on the filtrate solution (resulting
from the final NP washing step) did not detect the presence of Ir
within the sensitivity limits of the experiment, before or after catalyst
activation in the presence of H2. According to the information
provided by 1H NMR, the average polymerization degree of
the PMAA shell outside of the titanium dioxide core is ∼20
monomer units. DLS characterization of the two intact (completed)
nanosized SABRE catalysts (NPCs and PVPCs) found average particle
size/hydrodynamic radii of ∼8 and ∼57 nm, respectively;
DLS measurement of the initial TiO2/PMAA core–shell
particles indicates an average hydrodynamic radius of ∼6.4
nm. Supplemental molecular dynamics (MD) and quantum chemistry calculations
were also performed on the shell moieties of the NP catalysts: these
simulations showed that the average length of the polymer chain is
just over 3 nm. The estimated contribution to the NP diameter of the
PMAA shell is therefore roughly ∼6.1 nm (in turn, suggesting
an estimated average diameter of the TiO2 cores of roughly
∼6–7 nm). Based on all those calculations, a 100% occupancy
of the Ir catalyst moieties on the polymer chains (i.e., in a ∼1:1
ratio) would predict a mass percentage of ∼30% for the Ir catalyst
moiety (with respect to the other shell components and ignoring the
contribution from the TiO2 core); thus, a ∼25% weight
percentage for the Ir catalyst moiety would be consistent with the
TiO2 component contributing roughly 10% of the total particle
mass.
SABRE NMR Experiments
All NMR experiments were performed
on at 9.4 T (400 MHz); ex situ SABRE experiments
were performed at ∼100 G within the fringe field of the NMR
magnet. pH2[72] gas bubbling was
regulated by a manual flow meter; the gas was delivered to the NMR
sample via Teflon tubing. Like the pH2 delivery line, an
exhaust line of Teflon tubing was fed through a simple hole in the
cap of the NMR tube to maintain constant (near-ambient) overpressure.
Results and Discussion
Before a SABRE catalyst
can be used, it must first be activated
with H2 gas in the presence of excess substrate (e.g.,
refs (3) and (45)); failure to properly
activate the catalyst can result in irreversible loss of catalytic
activity.[45]In situ stopped-flow
pH2 bubbling enables the catalyst activation process to
be monitored via 1H NMR, particularly through the observation
of time-dependent changes to HP hydride resonances. Typical hydride
spectra of the nanoscale SABRE catalysts studied here are shown in
Figure 3, which may be compared with previous
results obtained with homogeneous SABRE catalysts. For example, activation
of the standard Ir-IMes homogeneous catalyst gives rise to three characteristically
upfield-shifted HP hydride resonances: two transient (typically dispersive)
peaks at −12.3 and −17.4 ppm associated with intermediate
structures and a strong absorptive peak at −22.8 ppm associated
with the final activated catalyst.[37,45]
Figure 3
(a) Typical 1H NMR spectrum from the hydride region
of PVP comb polymer SABRE catalysts (PVPCs), exhibiting emissive and
absorptive character for the three spectral regions of interest; spectrum
was acquired in situ during catalyst activation,
following ∼330 s of total pH2 bubbling. (b) Selected
spectra taken from the same spectral region of TiO2/PMAA
core–shell nanoparticle catalysts (NPCs), acquired with varying
durations of pH2 bubbling during catalyst activation and
use (note the significantly greater spectral complexity). (c) Typical 1H NMR spectrum from the same spectral region of a homogeneous
variant of the SABRE catalyst, with 4-aminopyridine bound to Ir in
the preactivated structure.[59,73] The spectrum was acquired in situ during catalyst activation, following ∼150
s of total pH2 bubbling. (d) Plots showing the decay (normalized
integrated NMR signal in magnitude mode) of intermediate species in
spectral regions of ∼(−)12.4 ppm and ∼(−)17.2
ppm for the data in (b), along with corresponding data showing the
rise of HP Ir-hydride resonances at ∼(−)22.8 ppm—likely
indicating the presence of activated catalyst. The trend lines/eye
guides are exponential fits. Data points taken at 450 s and earlier
were acquired with in situ (high-field) bubbling
within the magnet (filled symbols); later points were acquired with ex situ (low-field) bubbling and subsequent sample transfer
to the NMR magnet (and thus the ex situ signals may
be weaker because of relaxation during sample transit).
In our
previous work demonstrating HET-SABRE with microscale SABRE
catalysts using polymer bead supports,[59] it was difficult to observe any hydride signals—likely the
result of both reduced density of catalyst moieties and much larger
particle sizes (and hence slower tumbling times and much broader lines).
Here, strong HP1H hydride signals are observed for both
the polymer comb SABRE catalysts (e.g., Figure 3a) and the NP catalysts (e.g., Figure 3b):
Like the previous Ir-IMes homogeneous catalyst,[45] three regions of peaks are observed for both catalysts,
with similar average shift values. However, for the polymer comb catalysts
the first two peaks are emissive and absorptive (respectively) instead
of dispersive. Moreover, greater spectral differences are observed
for the NP catalysts: two lines are observed at each of the first
two regions near ∼(−)12.4 and ∼(−)17.2
ppm, and a complex multiplet pattern comprising ∼9–10
peaks is observed for the region at ∼(−)22.8 ppm that
changes over time (the peaks also appear to reside on a broad baseline).
The corresponding hydride region obtained from a similar homogeneous
SABRE catalyst [Ir(4-aminopyridine)(COD)(IMes)] (“4AP-cat”)—created
via addition of 4-aminopyridine after chloride abstraction (step 7
of Figure 1)[73]—is
shown in Figure 3c. Thus, given the similarity
of the spectra in Figure 3b,c, the complex
spectral appearance of their hydride regions may originate from the
presence of the amine moiety immediately adjacent to the pyridine
group tethering the Ir complex to the NP supports (as neither the
PVP comb catalysts nor the standard SABRE catalyst possess corresponding
amine groups) as well as possible differences in the on/off rates
for exchanging ligands for these catalyst species—the subject
of future study.Activation of the SABRE catalysts with pH2 and pyridine
involves hydrogenation (and subsequent loss) of the COD moiety, formation
of a hexacoordinate Ir complex (here, with ligands expected to comprise
the IMes group, two classical hydrides, two exchangeable substrate
pyridine groups, and the nonexchangeable pyridine derivative linker
group), and concomitant change in the Ir oxidation state from +1 to
+3;[3,45] solutions of the standard Ir IMes catalyst
also undergo a corresponding color change from bright orange-yellow
to clear.[37] The time dependence of the
HP signals from the hydride region of the NP catalyst is shown in
Figure 3d, plotted as a function of total pH2 bubbling time (flow rate: ∼20 cm3/min).
Simplistic exponential fits of the appearance of signals at the −22.8
ppm region and loss of signals at −12.4 and −17.2 ppm
give time constants of 140 ± 50, 300 ± 90, and 200 ±
90 s, respectively—in rough agreement with the activation of
the PVP comb catalysts and 4AP-cat as well as the original Ir-IMes
SABRE catalyst;[45] thus for all of these
catalysts, activation should be essentially complete within ∼10–15
min under these experimental conditions.Following activation,
the capability of both of the nanoscale catalysts
to provide SABRE enhancement was investigated. Results for the polymer
comb catalysts (PVPCs, synthesized first) are shown in Figure 4; the same sample from Figure 3a was studied, comprising ∼4 mg of PVPCs (corresponding to
an estimated 0.0031 mmol of the Ir complex) dissolved in 400 μL
of d6-ethanol along with 0.05 mmol of
pyridine substrate (giving a substrate concentration of 125 mM and
a substrate to catalyst–moiety ratio of ∼16:1). A typical
thermally polarized 1H NMR spectrum from the sample (here,
prior to acquisition) is provided in Figure 4a. A spectrum obtained after activation and 30 s of pH2 bubbling (∼93% pH2 fraction) at high field (in situ) is shown in Figure 4b. Unlike
the case with most homogeneous SABRE catalysts we have investigated
(see below), virtually no high-field SABRE enhancement is observed
in the spectrum—with the possible exception of a miniscule
emissive peak that may originate from bound pyridine (ortho-H position, ∼8.0 ppm). However, when the sample was removed
to allow for 30 s of pH2 bubbling within the weak fringe
field (∼100 G) and then rapidly reinserted into the NMR magnet,
a HET-SABRE-enhanced 1H NMR spectrum was acquired (Figure 4c). Indeed, the HET-SABRE spectrum is clearly manifested
by both the stronger signal and the emissive peaks for the pyridine
substrate, whose appearance follows the pattern typically obtained
with homogeneous SABRE.[37,45,59] Although quantification of the resulting SABRE effects is impeded
by relatively poor shim quality (owing to the effects of sample bubbling,
rapid sample transfer, etc.), estimated values for the signal enhancement,
ε = (Senhanced – Sthermal)/Sthermal (where S is a given integrated spectral intensity),
for ortho, para, and meta1H positions around the pyridine ring were ∼(−)7,
∼(−)6, and ∼(−)3, respectively—in
good agreement with simple peak-height measurements. However, these
results embody only a slight improvement over what was achieved with
the original HET-SABRE catalysts.[59]
Figure 4
(a) 1H NMR spectrum from a mixture containing d6-ethanol solvent, the PVP polymer comb catalyst
particles (PVPCs), and the (fully protonated) pyridine substrate thermally
polarized at 9.4 T following activation with pH2 bubbling.
(b) 1H NMR spectrum of the sample in (a) obtained after
PVPC activation but with pH2 bubbling occurring at high
field, acquired immediately after cessation of pH2 gas
bubbling; for the most part, no high-field (in situ) SABRE effect was observed. (c) 1H (ex situ) HET-SABRE NMR spectrum obtained from the same sample, acquired
immediately after 30 s of pH2 bubbling at low field (∼100
G) and rapid transfer of the sample into the NMR magnet. All spectra
shown were acquired with a single scan (90° pulse). Peaks at
about δ ≈1.1, ≈3.6, and ≈5.2 ppm are from
residual protons from the deuterated ethanol solvent. The peak at
≈4.5 ppm is from (ortho-)hydrogen (oH2) gas. The
inset shows the expected hexacoordinate structure of the activated
catalytic moiety, exchanging with pH2 and the substrate
pyridine (Py).
Results for the NP catalysts are shown in Figure 5. Here, the same sample from Figures 3b,d was studied, comprising ∼8 mg of TiO2/PMAA
core–shell NP catalysts (corresponding to an estimated 0.0031
mmol of the Ir complex) suspended in 400 μL d6-ethanol along with 0.05 mmol of pyridine substrate.
A number of thermally polarized 1H NMR spectra were acquired
over the course of the experiment, including one following catalyst
activation at high field (Figure 5a). Ex situ bubbling of pH2 (∼95% fraction)
for 30 s followed by rapid manual transfer of the sample into the
magnet gave rise to significant enhancements of the substrate 1H NMR signals (Figure 5c), with ε
values of ∼(−)18, ∼(−)17, and ∼(−)7
estimated for ortho, para, and meta positions, respectively. Subsequent acquisition following
300 s of ex situ pH2 bubbling yielded
larger enhancements of ∼(−)26, ∼(−)39,
and ∼(−)11 compared to a thermally polarized scan taken
afterward (bubbling does lead to some loss of liquid from the sample,
necessitating a fresh thermal scan). As before with the studies using
PVPCs, reduced shim quality made precise quantification of the enhancements
challenging, but the values reported are again in good agreement with
estimates based on simple peak-height analyses performed on peaks
with similar line widths. Moreover, on the SIUC setup (with a pH2 bubbler that is limited in operation to near-ambient pressure),
typical enhancements obtained with homogeneous catalysts rarely exceed
∼50–100-fold (also reflecting nonoptimal conditions
with respect to concentrations, temperature, magnetic field, etc.).
Thus, it is likely that significantly larger HET-SABRE enhancements
can be achieved in the future not only by improving the experimental
methodology but also through further optimization of the catalyst
syntheses and structures. Enhancement values for both nanoscale catalysts
tested here are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 5
(a) 1H NMR
spectrum from a mixture containing d6-ethanol
solvent, the nanoSABRE catalyst particles
(NPCs), and the (fully protonated) pyridine substrate thermally polarized
at 9.4 T following activation with pH2 bubbling. (b) 1H NMR spectrum of the sample in (a) obtained after nanoSABRE
catalyst activation but with pH2 bubbling occurring at
high field, acquired immediately after cessation of pH2 gas bubbling; no high-field (in situ) SABRE effect
was observed. (c) 1H (ex situ) HET-SABRE
NMR spectrum obtained from the same sample, acquired immediately after
30 s of pH2 bubbling at low field (∼100 G) and rapid
transfer of the sample into the NMR magnet. All spectra shown were
acquired with a single scan (90° pulse). Peaks at about δ
≈1.1, ≈3.6, and ≈5.2 ppm are from residual protons
from the deuterated ethanol solvent. The peak at ≈4.5 ppm is
from oH2. The inset shows the expected hexacoordinate structure
of the activated catalytic moiety, exchanging with pH2 and
the substrate (Py).
Table 1
Polarization Enhancement (ε)
Values for Three Aromatic Proton Sites of Pyridine (Figures 4, 5, and 7) Achieved via Conventional (ex Situ, Low-Field)
SABRE and Detected by High-Resolution 1H NMR Spectroscopy
Using the Nanoscale Catalysts (PVPCs or NPCs) in d6-Ethanol or d4-Methanola
catalyst
ε(Ho)
ε(Hp)
ε(Hm)
PVPCs (30 s)
–7
–6
–3
NPCs (30 s)
–18
–17
–7
NPCs (300 s)
–26
–39
–11
NPCs recycled
–11
–9.7
–3.2
Reported ε
values are calculated
from spectral integrals and are approximate, with estimated uncertainties
of ∼10%. Numbers in parentheses are pH2 bubbling
times.
Reported ε
values are calculated
from spectral integrals and are approximate, with estimated uncertainties
of ∼10%. Numbers in parentheses are pH2 bubbling
times.Similar to the results
with the PVPCs in Figure 4, no clear, qualitative
signatures of high-field SABRE could
be discerned from the spectra for the NP catalysts (Figure 5b). As first reported in ref (46), the standard homogeneous
Ir-IMes SABRE catalyst can give rise to 1H NMR enhancements
at high field, contrary to original expectation. The high-field SABRE
effect appears to result from nuclear spin cross-relaxation with HP
hydride spins[45] similar to the SPINOE,[74,75] as opposed to the conventional SABRE effect, which relies on scalar
couplings to efficiently transfer spin order when the external field
becomes low enough to match the frequency differences between substrate
and hydride resonances to the magnitudes of relevant scalar couplings.
While high-field SABRE enhancements are generally much smaller than
those achieved via conventional low-field SABRE, significantly larger in situ SABRE enhancements can be observed at high field
with the application of recently reported pulse sequences.[46,48] In any case, we note that we have observed high-field SABRE effects
with nearly every homogeneous catalyst variant that we have studied
(including 4AP-cat),[45,46,59,73] with the one notable exception being a variant
that exhibited only dispersive hydride signals[76] (and hence no net hyperpolarized z-magnetization
in the hydride spin bath). Thus, the virtual absence of high-field
SABRE effects with the nanoscale catalysts reported here manifests
a significant difference in NMR properties from their (much smaller)
homogeneous counterparts. This absence of high-field SABRE effects
may reflect intrinsically reduced efficiencies in the nuclear spin
cross-relaxation mechanism (e.g., because of altered correlation times)
as well as mass-transport limitations expected for heterogeneous/nanoscale
catalysts; for example, the possible observation of a weak negative
peak in Figure 4b (likely for an ortho-H resonance of bound pyridine substrate molecules) for the PVPCs
may indicate that high-field SABRE is indeed occurring to at least
some degree, but at far too inefficient of a rate (particularly when
additionally limited by the ligand exchange rates and macroscale transport
of substrates within the sample) for it to overcome the headwinds
of the thermal (Boltzmann/equilibrium) polarization processes.Other evidence supports that the SABRE enhancements in Figures 4 and 5 are endowed by intact
nanoscale catalysts and are not, say, from freely floating catalyst
molecules leached from the polymers or nanoparticles. Following SABRE
experiments, the solutions respectively containing the polymer comb
catalysts and nanoparticle catalysts were each centrifuged with ultrafilters
(see Experimental Approach and Supporting Information). Small portions of the
filtrate solutions were tested by AAS, and the presence of Ir was
not observed within the detection limits of the instrument. The remaining
filtrate solutions were dried and reconstituted in 400 μL of
a different solvent (d4-methanol) with
∼0.05 mmol of added pyridine substrate. As shown in Figure 6, no SABRE enhancement was observed in either reconstituted
filtrate solution following 30 s pH2 bubbling (∼93%
pH2 fraction) within the ∼100 G fringe field and
rapid sample transfer to the NMR magnet for detection.
Figure 6
Control 1H NMR spectra obtained from filtrate liquids
obtained from reconstituted solutions of NPCs (b) and PVPCs (d) in d4-methanol; corresponding thermal spectra of
the filtrate solutions are in (a) and (c). Both samples contained
added pyridine substrate, and pH2 bubbling was performed ex situ (∼100 G), as was done in Figures 4 and 5; note the absence
of SABRE enhancement in (b) and (d). The reduced signal strengths
in (b) and (d) are the result of rapid transfer of the samples into
the NMR magnet; given the apparent absence of SABRE enhancement from
within the filtrate samples, more time is required for the spins to
fully (thermally) magnetize in the external field, as occurred for
the acquisition of the corresponding thermally polarized reference
spectra in (a) and (c). Peaks at about δ ≈3.3 and ≈4.9
ppm are from residual protons from the deuterated methanol solvent;
the peak at ≈4.5 ppm is from oH2.
(a) Typical 1H NMR spectrum from the hydride region
of PVP comb polymer SABRE catalysts (PVPCs), exhibiting emissive and
absorptive character for the three spectral regions of interest; spectrum
was acquired in situ during catalyst activation,
following ∼330 s of total pH2 bubbling. (b) Selected
spectra taken from the same spectral region of TiO2/PMAA
core–shell nanoparticle catalysts (NPCs), acquired with varying
durations of pH2 bubbling during catalyst activation and
use (note the significantly greater spectral complexity). (c) Typical 1H NMR spectrum from the same spectral region of a homogeneous
variant of the SABRE catalyst, with 4-aminopyridine bound to Ir in
the preactivated structure.[59,73] The spectrum was acquired in situ during catalyst activation, following ∼150
s of total pH2 bubbling. (d) Plots showing the decay (normalized
integrated NMR signal in magnitude mode) of intermediate species in
spectral regions of ∼(−)12.4 ppm and ∼(−)17.2
ppm for the data in (b), along with corresponding data showing the
rise of HP Ir-hydride resonances at ∼(−)22.8 ppm—likely
indicating the presence of activated catalyst. The trend lines/eye
guides are exponential fits. Data points taken at 450 s and earlier
were acquired with in situ (high-field) bubbling
within the magnet (filled symbols); later points were acquired with ex situ (low-field) bubbling and subsequent sample transfer
to the NMR magnet (and thus the ex situ signals may
be weaker because of relaxation during sample transit).(a) 1H NMR spectrum from a mixture containing d6-ethanol solvent, the PVPpolymer comb catalyst
particles (PVPCs), and the (fully protonated) pyridine substrate thermally
polarized at 9.4 T following activation with pH2 bubbling.
(b) 1H NMR spectrum of the sample in (a) obtained after
PVPC activation but with pH2 bubbling occurring at high
field, acquired immediately after cessation of pH2 gas
bubbling; for the most part, no high-field (in situ) SABRE effect was observed. (c) 1H (ex situ) HET-SABRE NMR spectrum obtained from the same sample, acquired
immediately after 30 s of pH2 bubbling at low field (∼100
G) and rapid transfer of the sample into the NMR magnet. All spectra
shown were acquired with a single scan (90° pulse). Peaks at
about δ ≈1.1, ≈3.6, and ≈5.2 ppm are from
residual protons from the deuterated ethanol solvent. The peak at
≈4.5 ppm is from (ortho-)hydrogen (oH2) gas. The
inset shows the expected hexacoordinate structure of the activated
catalytic moiety, exchanging with pH2 and the substrate
pyridine (Py).(a) 1H NMR
spectrum from a mixture containing d6-ethanol
solvent, the nanoSABRE catalyst particles
(NPCs), and the (fully protonated) pyridine substrate thermally polarized
at 9.4 T following activation with pH2 bubbling. (b) 1H NMR spectrum of the sample in (a) obtained after nanoSABRE
catalyst activation but with pH2 bubbling occurring at
high field, acquired immediately after cessation of pH2 gas bubbling; no high-field (in situ) SABRE effect
was observed. (c) 1H (ex situ) HET-SABRE
NMR spectrum obtained from the same sample, acquired immediately after
30 s of pH2 bubbling at low field (∼100 G) and rapid
transfer of the sample into the NMR magnet. All spectra shown were
acquired with a single scan (90° pulse). Peaks at about δ
≈1.1, ≈3.6, and ≈5.2 ppm are from residual protons
from the deuterated ethanol solvent. The peak at ≈4.5 ppm is
from oH2. The inset shows the expected hexacoordinate structure
of the activated catalytic moiety, exchanging with pH2 and
the substrate (Py).Although the present
nanoscale catalysts were not designed with
facile separation or rapid HP-agent recovery in mind (but rather for
investigating different design approaches for enhancing HET-SABRE),
the above experiment afforded an opportunity to investigate the potential
of recovery and recycling/reuse of such supported SABRE catalysts.
For example, following the above SABRE experiments and ultrafilter
centrifugation, a portion of the NPCs were carefully recovered from
the ultrafilter cartridge, dried, and resuspended in 0.4 mL of an
alternative solvent (again, d4-methanol)
with ∼0.05 mmol of added pyridine substrate. Following low-field
bubbling with pH2 (∼85% pH2 fraction)
for 30 s and rapid transfer to high field, HET-SABRE enhancements
of the substrate 1H NMR signals are clearly observed from
the recycled and reconstituted NPCs (Figure 7). Although these enhancements (up to ∼(−)11-fold)
are smaller than what was achieved in the first experiments with these
catalysts—likely because of reduced catalyst concentration
and slightly reduced pH2 fraction (in addition to any loss
of catalytic activity suffered during the recovery/reconstitution
process)—these results demonstrate the feasibility of recovering
and recycling supported SABRE catalysts for reuse in NMR applications.
Figure 7
(a) 1H NMR spectrum from a mixture containing d4-methanol solvent, “recycled”
NPCs, and the pyridine substrate thermally polarized at 9.4 T. (b)
Corresponding 1H (ex situ) HET-SABRE NMR
spectrum obtained from the same sample of “recycled”
NPCs, acquired immediately after 30 s of pH2 bubbling at
low field (∼100 G) and rapid transfer of the sample into the
NMR magnet. All spectra shown were acquired with a single scan (90°
pulse). Peaks at about δ ≈3.3 and ≈4.9 ppm are
from residual protons from the deuterated methanol solvent. The peak
at ≈4.5 ppm is from oH2; broad peaks ∼1–2
ppm are primarily from the PMAA of the catalyst particles.
Control 1H NMR spectra obtained from filtrate liquids
obtained from reconstituted solutions of NPCs (b) and PVPCs (d) in d4-methanol; corresponding thermal spectra of
the filtrate solutions are in (a) and (c). Both samples contained
added pyridine substrate, and pH2 bubbling was performed ex situ (∼100 G), as was done in Figures 4 and 5; note the absence
of SABRE enhancement in (b) and (d). The reduced signal strengths
in (b) and (d) are the result of rapid transfer of the samples into
the NMR magnet; given the apparent absence of SABRE enhancement from
within the filtrate samples, more time is required for the spins to
fully (thermally) magnetize in the external field, as occurred for
the acquisition of the corresponding thermally polarized reference
spectra in (a) and (c). Peaks at about δ ≈3.3 and ≈4.9
ppm are from residual protons from the deuterated methanol solvent;
the peak at ≈4.5 ppm is from oH2.(a) 1H NMR spectrum from a mixture containing d4-methanol solvent, “recycled”
NPCs, and the pyridine substrate thermally polarized at 9.4 T. (b)
Corresponding 1H (ex situ) HET-SABRE NMR
spectrum obtained from the same sample of “recycled”
NPCs, acquired immediately after 30 s of pH2 bubbling at
low field (∼100 G) and rapid transfer of the sample into the
NMR magnet. All spectra shown were acquired with a single scan (90°
pulse). Peaks at about δ ≈3.3 and ≈4.9 ppm are
from residual protons from the deuterated methanol solvent. The peak
at ≈4.5 ppm is from oH2; broad peaks ∼1–2
ppm are primarily from the PMAA of the catalyst particles.
Conclusion
In summary,
we have reported the preparation and demonstration
of two novel nanoscale catalysts—respectively composed of PVPpolymer combs and TiO2/PMAA core–shell nanoparticles,
tethered to Ir-based catalytic moieties—for 1H NMR
enhancement by SABRE at the interface between truly heterogeneous
and homogeneous conditions. Enhancements of up to ∼7- and ∼40-fold
were observed for the PVP comb catalysts and NP catalysts, respectively.
The latter value represents nearly an order-of-magnitude improvement
over previous results obtained with microscale HET-SABRE catalysts
and corresponds to a 1H polarization of ∼0.13% at
9.4 T and 300 K. The feasibility of recovery and recycling of such
catalysts to achieve SABRE enhancement was also demonstrated. Taken
together, these results demonstrate the utility of rational design
for improving NMR enhancements via supported SABRE catalysts. Future
efforts will concern further improvements in polarization enhancements
(including fundamental studies of processes governing HET-SABRE enhancement
under different conditions) as well as efforts to allow preparation
of pure, physiologically relevant HP substrates in aqueous or biologically
compatible solutions for a wide range of biomedical spectroscopic
and imaging applications.
Authors: Andrey N Pravdivtsev; Alexandra V Yurkovskaya; Hans-Martin Vieth; Konstantin L Ivanov; Robert Kaptein Journal: Chemphyschem Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 3.102
Authors: Richard A Green; Ralph W Adams; Simon B Duckett; Ryan E Mewis; David C Williamson; Gary G R Green Journal: Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 9.795
Authors: Sam E Day; Mikko I Kettunen; Ferdia A Gallagher; De-En Hu; Mathilde Lerche; Jan Wolber; Klaes Golman; Jan Henrik Ardenkjaer-Larsen; Kevin M Brindle Journal: Nat Med Date: 2007-10-28 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Jan-Bernd Hövener; Niels Schwaderlapp; Robert Borowiak; Thomas Lickert; Simon B Duckett; Ryan E Mewis; Ralph W Adams; Michael J Burns; Louise A R Highton; Gary G R Green; Alexandra Olaru; Jürgen Hennig; Dominik von Elverfeldt Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Kirill V Kovtunov; Ekaterina V Pokochueva; Oleg G Salnikov; Samuel F Cousin; Dennis Kurzbach; Basile Vuichoud; Sami Jannin; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Boyd M Goodson; Danila A Barskiy; Igor V Koptyug Journal: Chem Asian J Date: 2018-05-23
Authors: Zijian Zhou; Jin Yu; Johannes F P Colell; Raul Laasner; Angus Logan; Danila A Barskiy; Roman V Shchepin; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Volker Blum; Warren S Warren; Thomas Theis Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Bryce E Kidd; Jamil A Mashni; Miranda N Limbach; Fan Shi; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Yuqing Hou; Boyd M Goodson Journal: Chemistry Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: Kirill V Kovtunov; Larisa M Kovtunova; Max E Gemeinhardt; Andrey V Bukhtiyarov; Jonathan Gesiorski; Valerii I Bukhtiyarov; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Igor V Koptyug; Boyd M Goodson Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Roman V Shchepin; Danila A Barskiy; Aaron M Coffey; Boyd M Goodson; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: ChemistrySelect Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 2.109
Authors: Jan-Bernd Hövener; Andrey N Pravdivtsev; Bryce Kidd; C Russell Bowers; Stefan Glöggler; Kirill V Kovtunov; Markus Plaumann; Rachel Katz-Brull; Kai Buckenmaier; Alexej Jerschow; Francesca Reineri; Thomas Theis; Roman V Shchepin; Shawn Wagner; Pratip Bhattacharya; Niki M Zacharias; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Milton L Truong; Thomas Theis; Aaron M Coffey; Roman V Shchepin; Kevin W Waddell; Fan Shi; Boyd M Goodson; Warren S Warren; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2015-03-30 Impact factor: 4.126