Literature DB >> 22996746

Hyperpolarized water as an MR imaging contrast agent: feasibility of in vivo imaging in a rat model.

Mark D Lingwood1, Ting Ann Siaw, Napapon Sailasuta, Osama A Abulseoud, Henry R Chan, Brian D Ross, Pratip Bhattacharya, Songi Han.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of a perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique that uses Overhauser dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) to provide contrast during the continuous delivery of hyperpolarized water in rats.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Protocols approved by the local institutional animal care and use committees were followed. Twelve male Wistar rats were anesthetized and prepared by placing injection tubing in the subcutaneous layer (n=3), peritoneum (n=3), aorta (n=3), or carotid artery (n=3). Water was hyperpolarized by means of Overhauser DNP in the 0.35-T fringe field of a 1.5-T MR imaging magnet by using a custom-built system to continuously deliver radical-free hyperpolarized water to the subject. Fast gradient-echo and spoiled gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging sequences were used. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the images was calculated and compared.
RESULTS: Images showed greatly altered SNR and enhanced flow contrast at all injection locations. For subcutaneous and intraperitoneal injections, the water perfusion trajectory was observed for approximately 5 seconds after injection. Flow through a 4.2-cm length of artery was seen during intra-aortic injection. The right hemisphere of the brain was seen during injection into the right carotid artery. Images with hyperpolarized water had greatly altered SNR compared with images without injection or with the injection of nonhyperpolarized water, with a range of 13%-27% for the carotid and 444%-2900% for the other regions.
CONCLUSION: Perfusion contrast for MR imaging can be obtained by continuously infusing hyperpolarized water, providing localized angiography or brain perfusion information in vivo for rat models. © RSNA, 2012

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22996746      PMCID: PMC3480810          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  28 in total

1.  Parahydrogen-induced polarization in imaging: subsecond (13)C angiography.

Authors:  K Golman; O Axelsson; H Jóhannesson; S Månsson; C Olofsson; J S Petersson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  DNP in MRI: an in-bore approach at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Jan G Krummenacker; Vasyl P Denysenkov; Maxim Terekhov; Laura M Schreiber; Thomas F Prisner
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Field-cycled PEDRI imaging of free radicals with detection at 450 mT.

Authors:  David J Lurie; Gareth R Davies; Margaret A Foster; James M S Hutchison
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 4.  Comparative overview of brain perfusion imaging techniques.

Authors:  Max Wintermark; Musa Sesay; Emmanuel Barbier; Katalin Borbély; William P Dillon; James D Eastwood; Thomas C Glenn; Cécile B Grandin; Salvador Pedraza; Jean-François Soustiel; Tadashi Nariai; Greg Zaharchuk; Jean-Marie Caillé; Vincent Dousset; Howard Yonas
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  Monitoring drug delivery processes by EPR and related techniques--principles and applications.

Authors:  David J Lurie; Karsten Mäder
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 15.470

6.  Diagnosis of acute cerebral infarction: comparison of CT and MR imaging.

Authors:  R N Bryan; L M Levy; W D Whitlow; J M Killian; T J Preziosi; J A Rosario
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Cytotoxicity of commonly used nitroxide radical spin probes.

Authors:  E G Ankel; C S Lai; L E Hopwood; Z Zivkovic
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1987-02-02       Impact factor: 5.037

8.  Assessment of brain perfusion with MRI: methodology and application to acute stroke.

Authors:  C B Grandin
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Molecular imaging with endogenous substances.

Authors:  Klaes Golman; Jan H Ardenkjaer-Larsen; J Stefan Petersson; Sven Mansson; Ib Leunbach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A study of the use of Overhauser enhancement to assist with needle and catheter placement during interventional MRI.

Authors:  Erkki Vahala; Mika Ylihautala; Gösta Ehnholm; Nina Etelä; Ian Young; Klaes Golman; Ib Leunbach
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  The use of hyperpolarized carbon-13 magnetic resonance for molecular imaging.

Authors:  Sarmad Siddiqui; Stephen Kadlecek; Mehrdad Pourfathi; Yi Xin; William Mannherz; Hooman Hamedani; Nicholas Drachman; Kai Ruppert; Justin Clapp; Rahim Rizi
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Overhauser Dynamic Nuclear Polarization-Enhanced NMR Relaxometry.

Authors:  John M Franck; Ravinath Kausik; Songi Han
Journal:  Microporous Mesoporous Mater       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 5.455

3.  NMR hyperpolarization techniques for biomedicine.

Authors:  Panayiotis Nikolaou; Boyd M Goodson; Eduard Y Chekmenev
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 5.236

Review 4.  Quantitative cw Overhauser effect dynamic nuclear polarization for the analysis of local water dynamics.

Authors:  John M Franck; Anna Pavlova; John A Scott; Songi Han
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 9.795

5.  Heterogeneous solution NMR signal amplification by reversible exchange.

Authors:  Fan Shi; Aaron M Coffey; Kevin W Waddell; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Boyd M Goodson
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Nanoscale Catalysts for NMR Signal Enhancement by Reversible Exchange.

Authors:  Fan Shi; Aaron M Coffey; Kevin W Waddell; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Boyd M Goodson
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.126

7.  Biochemical phosphates observed using hyperpolarized 31P in physiological aqueous solutions.

Authors:  Atara Nardi-Schreiber; Ayelet Gamliel; Talia Harris; Gal Sapir; Jacob Sosna; J Moshe Gomori; Rachel Katz-Brull
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Nanodiamond-enhanced MRI via in situ hyperpolarization.

Authors:  David E J Waddington; Mathieu Sarracanie; Huiliang Zhang; Najat Salameh; David R Glenn; Ewa Rej; Torsten Gaebel; Thomas Boele; Ronald L Walsworth; David J Reilly; Matthew S Rosen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Continuous-flow DNP polarizer for MRI applications at 1.5 T.

Authors:  V Denysenkov; M Terekhov; R Maeder; S Fischer; S Zangos; T Vogl; T F Prisner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A New Ir-NHC Catalyst for Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange in D2 O.

Authors:  Peter Spannring; Indrek Reile; Meike Emondts; Philipp P M Schleker; Niels K J Hermkens; Nick G J van der Zwaluw; Bram J A van Weerdenburg; Paul Tinnemans; Marco Tessari; Bernhard Blümich; Floris P J T Rutjes; Martin C Feiters
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 5.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.