Literature DB >> 26183732

Can we predict the size of frequently used autografts in ACL reconstruction?

Philip Zakko1, Carola F van Eck1, Daniel Guenther1, James J Irrgang1, Freddie H Fu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study presents a method to measure the size of quadriceps, patellar tendon and hamstring autografts using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: Sixty-two subjects with a mean age of 25 ± 10 years who underwent ACL surgery between 2011 and 2014 were included. Patient anthropometric data were recorded for all subjects. During surgery, the respective autograft was harvested and measured using commercially available graft sizers. MRI measurements were performed by two raters, who were blinded to the intra-operative measurements.
RESULTS: The inter- and intra-rater reliability was ≥0.8 for all MRI measurements. The intra-class correlation coefficient between the MRI measurement of the graft and the actual size of the harvested graft was 0.639. There were significant correlations between quadriceps tendon thickness and height (r = 0.3, p < 0.03), weight (r = 0.3, p < 0.01), BMI (r = 0.3, p < 0.04) and gender (r = -0.4, p < 0.002) and patellar tendon thickness and height (r = 0.4, p < 0.01), weight (r = 0.3, p < 0.01) and gender (r = -0.4, p < 0.012).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative MRI measurements of quadriceps, patellar tendon and hamstring graft size are highly reliable with moderate-to-good accuracy. Significant correlations between patient anthropometric data and the thicknesses of the quadriceps and patellar tendons were observed. Obtaining this information can be useful for preoperative planning and to help counsel patients on appropriate graft choices prior to surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; Graft size measurement; Hamstring autograft; MRI; Patellar tendon autograft; Quadriceps tendon autograft

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26183732     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3695-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  39 in total

Review 1.  Anatomic Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Verena M Schreiber; Carola F van Eck; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Prediction of the graft size of 4-stranded semitendinosus tendon and 4-stranded gracilis tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Chinese Han patient study.

Authors:  Guoming Xie; Xiaoqiao Huangfu; Jinzhong Zhao
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Individualized anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephen J Rabuck; Kellie K Middleton; Shugo Maeda; Yoshimasa Fujimaki; Bart Muller; Paulo H Araujo; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2012-03-03

4.  Using magnetic resonance imaging to predict adequate graft diameters for autologous hamstring double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Gregory Wernecke; Ian A Harris; Michael T W Houang; Bradley G Seeto; Darren B Chen; Samuel J MacDessi
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Hamstring graft sizes differ between Chinese and Caucasians.

Authors:  En-Rung Chiang; Hsiao-Li Ma; Shih-Tien Wang; Shih-Chieh Hung; Chien-Lin Liu; Tain-Hsiung Chen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft.

Authors:  I S Corry; J M Webb; A J Clingeleffer; L A Pinczewski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Size variability of the human anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites.

Authors:  Sebastian Kopf; Mathew W Pombo; Michal Szczodry; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of 5182 patients.

Authors:  Matthew J Kraeutler; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael W Mariscalco; David C Flanigan; Joshua Mitchell; Angela D Pedroza; Morgan H Jones; Jack T Andrish; Richard D Parker; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert A Magnussen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Is the native ACL insertion site "completely restored" using an individualized approach to single-bundle ACL-R?

Authors:  K K Middleton; B Muller; P H Araujo; Y Fujimaki; S J Rabuck; J J Irrgang; S Tashman; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  15 in total

1.  Predicting adequacy of free quadriceps tendon autograft, for primary and revision ACL reconstruction, from patients' physical parameters.

Authors:  Anthony Ugwuoke; Farhan Syed; Sam El-Kawy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The medial epicondyle of the distal femur is the optimal location for MRI measurement of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon cross-sectional area.

Authors:  Clayton T Hodges; Trevor J Shelton; Cyrus P Bateni; Stephen S Henrichon; Alton W Skaggs; Robert D Boutin; Cassandra A Lee; Brian M Haus; Richard A Marder
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Area of the tibial insertion site of the anterior cruciate ligament as a predictor for graft size.

Authors:  Daniel Guenther; Sebastian Irarrázaval; Marcio Albers; Cara Vernacchia; James J Irrgang; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  In situ cross-sectional area of the quadriceps tendon using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging significantly correlates with the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft.

Authors:  Satoshi Takeuchi; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Masashi Taguchi; Ryo Kanto; Kentaro Onishi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the quadriceps tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher P Emerson; Jessica M Bernstein; Fong Nham; Spencer Barnhill; Michael G Baraga; Eric Bogner; Jean Jose
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Ian D Engler; Ehab M Nazzal; Jonathan F Dalton; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Jonathan D Hughes; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Della Villa; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tsung-Min Lee; Wei-Ting Wu; Yi-Hsiang Chiu; Ke-Vin Chang; Levent Özçakar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Correlation of intra-operative hamstring autograft size with pre-operative anthropometric and MRI measurements.

Authors:  Sally Corey; Terry Mueller; Christopher Hartness; Balakrishna M Prasad
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-09-06

9.  Preoperative ultrasound predicts the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft more accurately than preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Satoshi Takeuchi; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Masashi Taguchi; Kentaro Onishi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  MRI evaluation to predict tendon size for knee ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Lawrence Camarda; Emanuele Grassedonio; Domenico Albano; Massimo Galia; Massimo Midiri; Michele D'Arienzo
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2018-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.