Literature DB >> 30809723

The medial epicondyle of the distal femur is the optimal location for MRI measurement of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon cross-sectional area.

Clayton T Hodges1, Trevor J Shelton2, Cyrus P Bateni3, Stephen S Henrichon3, Alton W Skaggs4, Robert D Boutin3, Cassandra A Lee1, Brian M Haus1, Richard A Marder1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Graft diameter ≥ 8 mm reduces the risk of failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ALCR) with hamstring tendon autograft. Pre-operative measurement of gracilis (GT) and semitendinosus (ST) cross-sectional area using MRI has been utilized but the optimal location for measurement is unknown. The main purpose of this study was to examine the cross-sectional areas of GT + ST at different locations and develop a model to predict whether a doubled hamstring graft of GT + ST will be of sufficient cross-sectional area for ACLR.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 154 patients who underwent primary ACLR using doubled hamstring autograft. Cross-sectional area measurements of GT + ST on pre-operative MRI axial images were made at three locations: medial epicondyle (ME), tibiofemoral joint line (TJL), and tibial physeal scar (TPS) and calculated the correlation of intra-operative graft size for each location using the Pearson's correlation coefficient. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) established a threshold that would predict graft diameter ≥ 8 mm.
RESULTS: Measurement of GT + ST at the ME had a stronger correlation (r = 0.389) to intra-operative graft diameter than measurements at the TJL (r = 0.256) or TPS (r = 0.240). The ROC indicated good predictive value for hamstring graft diameter ≥ 8 mm based on MRI measurement at the ME with the optimal threshold with the highest sensitivity and specificity as 18 mm2.
CONCLUSION: Cross-sectional area measurement of GT + ST at the ME correlated most closely to intra-operative diameter of a doubled hamstring autograft compared to measurements at the TJL or the TPS. As graft diameter < 8 mm is correlated with higher failure rates of ACL surgery, the ability to pre-operatively predict graft diameter is clinically useful. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Anatomy; Graft size; Hamstring autograft; MRI; Preoperative planning

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30809723     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05421-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  18 in total

1.  Prediction of semitendinosus and gracilis autograft sizes for ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Tahsin Beyzadeoglu; Umut Akgun; Neslihan Tasdelen; Mustafa Karahan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Autograft Versus Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Systematic Review of Overlapping Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Chao Zeng; Shu-guang Gao; Hui Li; Tuo Yang; Wei Luo; Yu-sheng Li; Guang-hua Lei
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Predictive value of preoperative 3-dimensional computer tomography measurement of semitendinosus tendon harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Masanori Yasumoto; Masataka Deie; Toru Sunagawa; Nobuo Adachi; Kenji Kobayashi; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Joshua D Harris; Yale A Fillingham; Rachel M Frank; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Bernard R Bach; Brian J Cole; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

Authors:  Terry K Koo; Mae Y Li
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-31

6.  A Review of Current Graft Options for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Nima Mehran; Vasilios Bill Moutzouros; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  JBJS Rev       Date:  2015-11-10

7.  Can we predict the size of frequently used autografts in ACL reconstruction?

Authors:  Philip Zakko; Carola F van Eck; Daniel Guenther; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Can Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict Intraoperative Autograft Size for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Suhail Agarwal; Darren de Sa; Devin C Peterson; Daniel Parmar; Nicole Simunovic; Rick Ogilvie; Volker Musahl; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging cross-sectional area for the measurement of hamstring autograft diameter for reconstruction of the adolescent anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Brent A Bickel; T Ty Fowler; John G Mowbray; Brent Adler; Kevin Klingele; Gary Phillips
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring: Can Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accurately Predict Graft Diameter?

Authors:  Brian M Grawe; Phillip N Williams; Alissa Burge; Marcia Voigt; David W Altchek; Jo A Hannafin; Answorth A Allen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-05-26
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tsung-Min Lee; Wei-Ting Wu; Yi-Hsiang Chiu; Ke-Vin Chang; Levent Özçakar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Assessment of thickness of in vivo autograft tendons around the knee and its correlation with anthropometric data, thickness of patella and anterior cruciate ligament tibial foot print diameter.

Authors:  Balgovind S Raja; Kshitij Gupta; Abdusamad V; Sukhmin Singh; Subhajit Maji
Journal:  Anat Cell Biol       Date:  2021-03-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.