Literature DB >> 31363806

Predicting adequacy of free quadriceps tendon autograft, for primary and revision ACL reconstruction, from patients' physical parameters.

Anthony Ugwuoke1, Farhan Syed2, Sam El-Kawy3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Free quadriceps tendon autograft (QTA) has gained popularity for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study is to measure the dimensions of quadriceps tendon and determine its correlation with patient's height, weight and BMI. This is to provide a guide for patients and surgeons in predicting the suitability of QTA for ACL reconstructions.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study in which the length and thickness of the quadriceps tendon was measured in 51 Caucasian patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty. Exclusion criteria include non-Caucasians and previous tendon pathology. Patients were selected from routine elective total knee arthroplasty list. Tendon length is taken from musculotendinous junction to its insertion. Thickness was measured at midpoint and at distal insertion. Patients' height, weight and BMI were recorded. The correlation between patient physical parameters and tendon dimensions were determined.
RESULTS: Subjects' median age was 65 years (range 44-87), with 34 females and 17 males. Median length of the tendon was 9 mm (range 70-110), and median insertional thickness was 9 mm (7-10 mm). Median thickness at midpoint was 7 mm (range 4-10 mm). There was moderately positive correlation between subjects' height and tendon length (correlation coefficient 0.50), and also between weight and tendon length (correlation coefficient 0.47). There was no significant correlation between subjects' BMI and the tendon length. There was also no significant correlation between tendon thickness and subject's physical parameters.
CONCLUSION: This study has shown that most patients could provide adequate QTA for ACL reconstruction. It also points to the fact that no investigation is required to predict the adequacy of QTA. Though further studies with larger sample size are required to confirm this, clinician can rely on analysing patients' physical parameter in predicting the adequacy of QTA for ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Bone–patellar tendon–bone graft; Donor site morbidity; Free quadriceps tendon autograft; Hamstring autograft

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31363806     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05640-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  47 in total

1.  A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Leo A Pinczewski; David J Deehan; Lucy J Salmon; Vivianne J Russell; Amanda Clingeleffer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Age-related quadriceps-dominant muscle atrophy and incident radiographic knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Shinichi Ikeda; Hiroshi Tsumura; Takehiko Torisu
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.601

Review 3.  Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults.

Authors:  Nicholas Gh Mohtadi; Denise S Chan; Katie N Dainty; Daniel B Whelan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

4.  Minimally invasive harvest of a quadriceps tendon graft with or without a bone block.

Authors:  Christian Fink; Mirco Herbort; Elisabeth Abermann; Christian Hoser
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2014-08-11

5.  Outcomes of Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Bone-Quadriceps Tendon Graft Versus Double-Bundle Hamstring Tendon Graft.

Authors:  Joon Kyu Lee; Sahnghoon Lee; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Comparison of Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 15-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Julian A Feller; Nigel Hartnett; Warren B Leigh; Anneka K Richmond
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Anterior cruciate ligament graft choices.

Authors:  Alec A Macaulay; Dean C Perfetti; William N Levine
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.843

8.  Prediction of length and diameter of hamstring tendon autografts for knee ligament surgery in Caucasians.

Authors:  Rob P A Janssen; Maria J F van der Velden; Marijn van den Besselaar; Max Reijman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  User's guide to correlation coefficients.

Authors:  Haldun Akoglu
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-08-07

10.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone plug-free quadriceps tendon autograft: intermediate-term clinical outcome after 24-36 months.

Authors:  Arndt P Schulz; Vivien Lange; Justus Gille; Christine Voigt; Susanne Fröhlich; Markus Stuhr; Christian Jürgens
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2013-11-19
View more
  2 in total

1.  Estimating the adequacy of the free quadriceps tendon autograft length using anthropometric measures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yavuz Yuksel; Ozkan Kose; Ebru Torun; Tarkan Ergun; Fatma Yardibi; Levent Sarikcioglu
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Quadriceps Tendon Autograft in Pediatric ACL Reconstruction: Graft Dimensions and Prediction of Size on Preoperative MRI.

Authors:  Soroush Baghdadi; David P VanEenenaam; Brendan A Williams; J Todd R Lawrence; Kathleen J Maguire; Lawrence Wells; Theodore J Ganley
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-12-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.