Literature DB >> 33552539

The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre- and postcopulatory fitness components.

Lucas Marie-Orleach1,2,3,4, Nikolas Vellnow1,5, Lukas Schärer1.   

Abstract

In species with multiple mating, intense sexual selection may occur both before and after copulation. However, comparing the strength of pre- and postcopulatory selection is challenging, because (i) postcopulatory processes are generally difficult to observe and (ii) the often-used opportunity for selection (I) metric contains both deterministic and stochastic components. Here, we quantified pre- and postcopulatory male fitness components of the simultaneously hermaphroditic flatworm, Macrostomum lignano. We did this by tracking fluorescent sperm-using transgenics-through the transparent body of sperm recipients, enabling to observe postcopulatory processes in vivo. Moreover, we sequentially exposed focal worms to three independent mating groups, and in each assessed their mating success, sperm-transfer efficiency, sperm fertilizing efficiency, and partner fecundity. Based on these multiple measures, we could, for each fitness component, combine the variance (I) with the repeatability (R) in individual success to assess the amount of repeatable variance in individual success-a measure we call the repeatable opportunity for selection (IR ). We found higher repeatable opportunity for selection in sperm-transfer efficiency and sperm fertilizing efficiency compared to mating success, which clearly suggests that postcopulatory selection is stronger than precopulatory selection. Our study demonstrates that the opportunity for selection contains a repeatable deterministic component, which can be assessed and disentangled from the often large stochastic component, to provide a better estimate of the strength of selection.
© 2020 The Authors. Evolution Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) and European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cryptic female choice; hermaphrodites; mate choice; measuring selection; opportunity for sexual selection; sperm competition

Year:  2020        PMID: 33552539      PMCID: PMC7857279          DOI: 10.1002/evl3.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Lett        ISSN: 2056-3744


  43 in total

1.  The opportunity to be misled in studies of sexual selection.

Authors:  M D Jennions; H Kokko; H Klug
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  Receipt of seminal fluid proteins causes reduction of male investment in a simultaneous hermaphrodite.

Authors:  Yumi Nakadera; Elferra M Swart; Jeroen N A Hoffer; Onno den Boon; Jacintha Ellers; Joris M Koene
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry.

Authors:  Julie Collet; David S Richardson; Kirsty Worley; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The mismeasurement of sexual selection.

Authors:  H Klug; J Heuschele; M D Jennions; H Kokko
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  High opportunity for postcopulatory sexual selection under field conditions.

Authors:  Biz R Turnell; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Indirect genetic effects and sexual conflicts: Partner genotype influences multiple morphological and behavioral reproductive traits in a flatworm.

Authors:  Lucas Marie-Orleach; Nadja Vogt-Burri; Pierick Mouginot; Aline Schlatter; Dita B Vizoso; Nathan W Bailey; Lukas Schärer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Quantifying episodes of sexual selection: Insights from a transparent worm with fluorescent sperm.

Authors:  Lucas Marie-Orleach; Tim Janicke; Dita B Vizoso; Patrice David; Lukas Schärer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Sex allocation adjustment to mating group size in a simultaneous hermaphrodite.

Authors:  Tim Janicke; Lucas Marie-Orleach; Katrien De Mulder; Eugene Berezikov; Peter Ladurner; Dita B Vizoso; Lukas Schärer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  New insights into the karyotype evolution of the free-living flatworm Macrostomum lignano (Platyhelminthes, Turbellaria).

Authors:  Kira S Zadesenets; Lukas Schärer; Nikolay B Rubtsov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Immediate predation risk alters the relationship between potential and realised selection on male traits in the Trinidad guppy Poecilia reticulata.

Authors:  Alexandra Glavaschi; Silvia Cattelan; Alessandro Devigili; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Measuring Pre- and Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection and Their Interaction in Socially Monogamous Species with Extra-Pair Paternity.

Authors:  Emily Rebecca Alison Cramer
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 6.600

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.