Literature DB >> 26177703

Quality Management and Key Performance Indicators in Oncologic Esophageal Surgery.

Ines Gockel1,2, Constantin Johannes Ahlbrand3,4, Michael Arras5, Elke Maria Schreiber6, Hauke Lang7.   

Abstract

Ranking systems and comparisons of quality and performance indicators will be of increasing relevance for complex "high-risk" procedures such as esophageal cancer surgery. The identification of evidence-based standards relevant for key performance indicators in esophageal surgery is essential for establishing monitoring systems and furthermore a requirement to enhance treatment quality. In the course of this review, we analyze the key performance indicators case volume, radicality of resection, and postoperative morbidity and mortality, leading to continuous quality improvement. Ranking systems established on this basis will gain increased relevance in highly complex procedures within the national and international comparison and furthermore improve the treatment of patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Key performance indicators; Oncologic esophageal surgery; Quality management; Ranking systems

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26177703     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3790-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  74 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The role of quality assurance versus continuous quality improvement.

Authors:  J Goldstone
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Ines Gockel; Arnold Radtke; Thomas J Musholt; Stephan Timm; Andreas Rink; Achilleas Tsiamis; Constantine Karaliotas; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection.

Authors:  B P Whooley; S Law; S C Murthy; A Alexandrou; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Kaizen method for esophagectomy patients: improved quality control, outcomes, and decreased costs.

Authors:  Mark D Iannettoni; William R Lynch; Kalpaj R Parekh; Kelley A McLaughlin
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Postoperative pulmonary complications are associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes after extended esophagectomy.

Authors:  Shoichi Kinugasa; Mitsuo Tachibana; Hiroshi Yoshimura; Shuhei Ueda; Toshiyuki Fujii; Dipok Kumar Dhar; Takeru Nakamoto; Naofumi Nagasue
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Complications and costs after high-risk surgery: where should we focus quality improvement initiatives?

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Peter J Pronovost; John A Cowan; Pamela A Lipsett
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 9.  Adipokines: inflammation and the pleiotropic role of white adipose tissue.

Authors:  Paul Trayhurn; I Stuart Wood
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 10.  Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes after esophagectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Natalie S Blencowe; Sean Strong; Angus G K McNair; Sara T Brookes; Tom Crosby; S Michael Griffin; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Oncologic esophageal resection and reconstruction : Open, hybrid, minimally invasive or robotic?]

Authors:  I Gockel; D Lorenz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  [Economic aspects of oncological esophageal surgery : Centralization is essential].

Authors:  N von Dercks; I Gockel; M Mehdorn; D Lorenz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Is There a Rationale for Structural Quality Assurance in Esophageal Surgery?

Authors:  Torben Glatz; Jens Höppner
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-03-24

4.  Impact of the interval between neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy in the modern era: a population-based propensity-score-matched retrospective cohort study in Asia.

Authors:  Yao-Hung Kuo; Yu-Wen Chien; Pin-Ru Chen; Chun-Lung Feng; Chia-Chin Li; Chun-Ru Chien
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Neoadjuvant vs definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Chih-Yi Chen; Chia-Chin Li; Chun-Ru Chien
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 2.754

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.