Literature DB >> 12742194

Complications and costs after high-risk surgery: where should we focus quality improvement initiatives?

Justin B Dimick1, Peter J Pronovost, John A Cowan, Pamela A Lipsett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on the relative clinical and economic impact of postoperative complications are needed in order to direct quality improvement efforts. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients undergoing two high-risk surgical procedures, hepatectomy (n = 569) and esophagectomy (n = 366), from 1994 to 1998 were included. Data were abstracted from the Maryland hospital discharge database. Relative resource use was determined using median regression, adjusting for patient comorbidities and other case-mix variables.
RESULTS: A total of 935 patients were studied. Overall in-hospital mortality was 6.1%; complication rate was 38.4%. Median cost for all patients was $14,527 (interquartile range $10,936-$21,412) and length of stay 9 days (interquartile range 7-13 days). Median hospital cost was increased for patients with complications ($16,868 versus $12,861; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, several complications remained associated with increased cost. Acute renal failure ($25,219), septicemia ($18,852), and myocardial infarction ($9,573) were associated with the greatest increase in resource use. But because the incidence of each complication varies, the attributable fraction of total resource use was highest for acute renal failure (19%), septicemia (16%), and surgical complications (16%).
CONCLUSIONS: Complications are independently associated with increased resource use after high-risk surgery. Population-based studies may be valuable in determining the relative economic importance of postoperative complications. Quality improvement efforts for these complications should be prioritized based on both the incidence of the complication and its independent contribution to increased resource use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12742194     DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00122-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  41 in total

1.  The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Mahbod Paya; C Melinda Stevens; Shahrzad Mavandadi; Kambiz Zainabadi; Samuel E Wilson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  What is the best management strategy for high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus? A cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  N J Shaheen; J M Inadomi; B F Overholt; P Sharma
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Systematic review and cost analysis comparing use of chlorhexidine with use of iodine for preoperative skin antisepsis to prevent surgical site infection.

Authors:  Ingi Lee; Rajender K Agarwal; Bruce Y Lee; Neil O Fishman; Craig A Umscheid
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity are more predictive of costs than postoperative complications: a case study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

Authors:  Daniel L Davenport; William G Henderson; Shukri F Khuri; Robert M Mentzer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Which Complications Matter Most? Prioritizing Quality Improvement in Emergency General Surgery.

Authors:  John E Scarborough; Jessica Schumacher; Theodore N Pappas; Christopher C McCoy; Brian R Englum; Suresh K Agarwal; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 6.  Quality Management and Key Performance Indicators in Oncologic Esophageal Surgery.

Authors:  Ines Gockel; Constantin Johannes Ahlbrand; Michael Arras; Elke Maria Schreiber; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Exploring the relationship between costs and quality: does the joint evaluation of costs and quality alter the ranking of Danish hospital departments?

Authors:  Anne Hvenegaard; Jacob Nielsen Arendt; Andrew Street; Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-08-02

8.  Predictors and outcome of early recurrence after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Masaki Kaibori; Yoshinori Iwamoto; Morihiko Ishizaki; Kosuke Matsui; Kazuhiko Yoshioka; Hiroaki Asano; A-Hon Kwon
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Cost of practice in a tertiary/quaternary referral center: is it sustainable?

Authors:  K G Cologne; G S Hwang; A J Senagore
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: focus on ertapenem.

Authors:  Fausto de Lalla
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.