Literature DB >> 26176326

Awareness of the Food and Drug Administration's Bad Ad Program and Education Regarding Pharmaceutical Advertising: A National Survey of Prescribers in Ambulatory Care Settings.

Amie C O'Donoghue1, Vanessa Boudewyns2, Kathryn J Aikin1, Emily Geisen2, Kevin R Betts1, Brian G Southwell2.   

Abstract

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Bad Ad program educates health care professionals about false or misleading advertising and marketing and provides a pathway to report suspect materials. To assess familiarity with this program and the extent of training about pharmaceutical marketing, a sample of 2,008 health care professionals, weighted to be nationally representative, responded to an online survey. Approximately equal numbers of primary care physicians, specialists, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners answered questions concerning Bad Ad program awareness and its usefulness, as well as their likelihood of reporting false or misleading advertising, confidence in identifying such advertising, and training about pharmaceutical marketing. Results showed that fewer than a quarter reported any awareness of the Bad Ad program. Nonetheless, a substantial percentage (43%) thought it seemed useful and 50% reported being at least somewhat likely to report false or misleading advertising in the future. Nurse practitioners and physician assistants expressed more openness to the program and reported receiving more training about pharmaceutical marketing. Bad Ad program awareness is low, but opportunity exists to solicit assistance from health care professionals and to help health care professionals recognize false and misleading advertising. Nurse practitioners and physician assistants are perhaps the most likely contributors to the program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26176326      PMCID: PMC7342489          DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  17 in total

1.  An innovative approach to educating medical students about pharmaceutical promotion.

Authors:  M S Wilkes; J R Hoffman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Ernst R Berndt; Julie M Donohue; Richard G Frank; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Nurses' risk assessment judgements: a confidence calibration study.

Authors:  Huiqin Yang; Carl Thompson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  A content analysis of direct-to-consumer television prescription drug advertisements.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; William DeJong; Rima E Rudd; Lawren H Daltroy
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

Review 5.  Interactions between pharmaceutical representatives and doctors in training. A thematic review.

Authors:  Daniella A Zipkin; Michael A Steinman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Changing interactions between physician trainees and the pharmaceutical industry: a national survey.

Authors:  Kirsten E Austad; Jerry Avorn; Jessica M Franklin; Mary K Kowal; Eric G Campbell; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Medical students' attitudes toward pharmaceutical marketing: possibilities for change.

Authors:  D C Vinson; B McCandless; M C Hosokawa
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Hemodynamic assessment in managing the critically ill: is physician confidence warranted?

Authors:  N V Dawson; A F Connors; T Speroff; A Kemka; P Shaw; H R Arkes
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1993 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 9.  The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education.

Authors:  F W Hafferty; R Franks
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers and providers, 2001-2010.

Authors:  Rachel Kornfield; Julie Donohue; Ernst R Berndt; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Detecting and Reporting Deceptive Prescription Drug Promotion: Differences Across Consumer and Physician Audiences and by Number and Type of Deceptive Claims and Tactics.

Authors:  Kevin R Betts; Amie C O'Donoghue; Mihaela Johnson; Vanessa Boudewyns; Ryan S Paquin
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2021-04-12

2.  Consumer understanding of the scope of FDA's prescription drug regulatory oversight: A nationally representative survey.

Authors:  Helen W Sullivan; Kathryn J Aikin; Kathleen T David; Jennifer Berktold; Karen L Stein; Victoria J Hoverman
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.732

3.  A follow-up study on the effects of an educational intervention against pharmaceutical promotion.

Authors:  M Murat Civaner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.