Literature DB >> 33840305

Detecting and Reporting Deceptive Prescription Drug Promotion: Differences Across Consumer and Physician Audiences and by Number and Type of Deceptive Claims and Tactics.

Kevin R Betts1, Amie C O'Donoghue1, Mihaela Johnson2, Vanessa Boudewyns2, Ryan S Paquin2.   

Abstract

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Bad Ad program provides an avenue for healthcare providers to report false or misleading prescription drug promotion. Yet, whether healthcare providers can detect such promotion, and whether they believe it should be reported to FDA, remain open questions. Consumer audiences may also be capable of detecting such promotion and believe it should be reported, but even less is known about capability and belief in this population. Across two experiments using mock pharmaceutical websites, this research investigated capability to detect and inclination to report deceptive prescription drug promotion among a sample of primary care physicians and consumers. Study 1 varied the number of deceptive claims and tactics on a website for a chronic pain medication, operationalized as none, two, or five. Study 2 varied the type of deceptive content on a website for a weight loss medication, operationalized as none, implicit, or explicit. Findings reveal that, in line with expectations from FDA's Bad Ad program, physicians can detect deceptive promotion and tend to believe it should be reported. Consumers are also capable of detecting deceptive promotion and tend to believe it should be reported, but their capabilities and beliefs regarding reporting are generally lower.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33840305      PMCID: PMC9511828          DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1909264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  9 in total

1.  Trouble Spots in Online Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Promotion: A Content Analysis of FDA Warning Letters.

Authors:  Hyosun Kim
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-08-25

2.  Semantic associations and elaborative inference.

Authors:  G McKoon; R Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Accuracy of deception judgments.

Authors:  Charles F Bond; Bella M DePaulo
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2006

4.  Awareness of the Food and Drug Administration's Bad Ad Program and Education Regarding Pharmaceutical Advertising: A National Survey of Prescribers in Ambulatory Care Settings.

Authors:  Amie C O'Donoghue; Vanessa Boudewyns; Kathryn J Aikin; Emily Geisen; Kevin R Betts; Brian G Southwell
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-07-15

5.  Individual- and Ad-Level Predictors of Perceptions of Serious and Actionable Risks in Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug TV Advertising.

Authors:  Kathryn J Aikin; Vanessa Boudewyns; Kevin R Betts; Brian G Southwell; Peyton Williams
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2019-06-28

6.  Experimental evidence of consumer and physician detection and rejection of misleading prescription drug website content.

Authors:  Vanessa Boudewyns; Kevin R Betts; Mihaela Johnson; Ryan S Paquin; Amie C O'Donoghue; Brian G Southwell
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2020-07-06

7.  An Empirical Examination of the FDAAA-Mandated "Toll-Free Statement" for Consumer Reporting of Side Effects in Direct-to-Consumer Television Advertisements.

Authors:  Kathryn J Aikin; Amie C O'Donoghue; Claudia Squire; Helen W Sullivan; Kevin R Betts
Journal:  J Public Policy Mark       Date:  2016-04-01

8.  Medical Marketing in the United States, 1997-2016.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Pilgrims sailing the Titanic: plausibility effects on memory for misinformation.

Authors:  Scott R Hinze; Daniel G Slaten; William S Horton; Ryan Jenkins; David N Rapp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.