Daniella A Zipkin1, Michael A Steinman. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA. danizipkin@yahoo.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Medical school and residency are formative years in establishing patterns of prescribing. We aimed to review the literature regarding the extent of pharmaceutical industry contact with trainees, attitudes about these interactions, and effects on trainee prescribing behavior, with an emphasis on points of potential intervention and policy formation. DESIGN: We searched MEDLINE from 1966 until May 2004 for English language articles. All original articles were included if the abstract reported content relevant to medical training and the pharmaceutical industry. Editorials, guidelines, and policy recommendations were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Contact with pharmaceutical representatives was common among residents. The majority of trainees felt that the interactions were appropriate. A minority felt that their own prescribing could be influenced by contact or gifts, but were more likely to believe that others' prescribing could be influenced. Resident prescribing was associated with pharmaceutical representative visits and the availability of samples. A variety of policy and educational interventions appear to influence resident attitudes toward interactions with industry, although data on the long-term effects of these interventions are limited. Overall, residents reported insufficient training in this area. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmaceutical industry has a significant presence during residency training, has gained the overall acceptance of trainees, and appears to influence prescribing behavior. Training programs can benefit from policies and curricula that teach residents about industry influence and ways in which to critically evaluate information that they are given. Recommendations for local and national approaches are discussed.
OBJECTIVE: Medical school and residency are formative years in establishing patterns of prescribing. We aimed to review the literature regarding the extent of pharmaceutical industry contact with trainees, attitudes about these interactions, and effects on trainee prescribing behavior, with an emphasis on points of potential intervention and policy formation. DESIGN: We searched MEDLINE from 1966 until May 2004 for English language articles. All original articles were included if the abstract reported content relevant to medical training and the pharmaceutical industry. Editorials, guidelines, and policy recommendations were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Contact with pharmaceutical representatives was common among residents. The majority of trainees felt that the interactions were appropriate. A minority felt that their own prescribing could be influenced by contact or gifts, but were more likely to believe that others' prescribing could be influenced. Resident prescribing was associated with pharmaceutical representative visits and the availability of samples. A variety of policy and educational interventions appear to influence resident attitudes toward interactions with industry, although data on the long-term effects of these interventions are limited. Overall, residents reported insufficient training in this area. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmaceutical industry has a significant presence during residency training, has gained the overall acceptance of trainees, and appears to influence prescribing behavior. Training programs can benefit from policies and curricula that teach residents about industry influence and ways in which to critically evaluate information that they are given. Recommendations for local and national approaches are discussed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health
Authors: Susan D Wolfsthal; Brent W Beasley; Richard Kopelman; William Stickley; Timothy Gabryel; Marc J Kahn Journal: Acad Med Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Johannes P Borde; Sarah Nussbaum; Stefanie Hauser; Philip Hehn; Johannes Hübner; Gabriela Sitaru; Sebastian Köller; Bruno Schweigert; Katja deWith; Winfried V Kern; Klaus Kaier Journal: Infection Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 3.553
Authors: Peggy Piascik; Daphne Bernard; Suresh Madhavan; Todd D Sorensen; Steve C Stoner; Tom TenHoeve Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2007-08-15 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Amie C O'Donoghue; Vanessa Boudewyns; Kathryn J Aikin; Emily Geisen; Kevin R Betts; Brian G Southwell Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2015-07-15
Authors: Geoffrey K Spurling; Peter R Mansfield; Brett D Montgomery; Joel Lexchin; Jenny Doust; Noordin Othman; Agnes I Vitry Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 11.069