Literature DB >> 24346416

11C-choline PET/CT detects the site of relapse in the majority of prostate cancer patients showing biochemical recurrence after EBRT.

Francesco Ceci1, Paolo Castellucci, Tiziano Graziani, Riccardo Schiavina, Eugenio Brunocilla, Renzo Mazzarotto, Maria Ntreta, Filippo Lodi, Giuseppe Martorana, Stefano Fanti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the usefulness and the detection rate of (11)C-choline PET/CT in a population of patients with prostate cancer (PC), exclusively treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) as primary treatment, who showed biochemical relapse.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 140 patients showing a serum PSA level >2 ng/mL (mean 8.6 ng/mL, median 5 ng/mL, range 2 - 60 ng/mL). All patients had been treated with EBRT to the prostate gland and prostatic fossa with doses ranging from 70 to 76 Gy in low-risk patients (T1/T2 and/or serum PSA <10 ng/mL) and escalating to >76 Gy (range 76 - 81 Gy) in high-risk patients (T3/T4 and/or serum PSA >10 ng/mL). Of the 140 patients, 53 were receiving androgen deprivation therapy at the time of the scan. All positive (11)C-choline PET/CT findings were validated by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy or at least 12 months of follow-up with contrast-enhanced CT, MR, bone scintigraphy or a repeated (11)C-choline PET/CT scan. The relationships between the detection rate of (11)C-choline PET/CT and the factors PSA level, PSA kinetics, Gleason score, age, time to relapse and SUV max in patients with positive findings were analysed.
RESULTS: (11)C-Choline PET/CT detected the site of relapse in 123 of the 140 patients with a detection rate of 87.8 % (46 patients showed local relapse, 31 showed local and distant relapse, and 46 showed only distant relapse). In patients with relapse the mean serum PSA level was 9.08 ng/mL (median 5.1 ng/mL, range 2 - 60 ng/mL), the mean PSA doubling time was 5.6 months (median 3.5 months, range 0.4 - 48 months), and the mean PSA velocity was 15 ng/mL/year (median 8.8 ng/mL/year, range 0.4 - 87 ng/mL/year). Of the 123 patients with relapse, 77 (62.6 %) showed distant relapse with/without local relapse, and of these 77, 31 (40.2 %) showed oligometastatic disease (one or two distant lesions: lymph node lesions only in 16, bone lesions only in 14, and lymph node lesions and bone lesions in 1). In univariate and multivariate analyses PSA kinetics was the only variable affecting (11)C-choline PET/CT detection rate. A significant correlation between PSA kinetics and site of recurrence (local relapse only vs. distant metastasis) was also observed.
CONCLUSION: The detection rate of (11)C-choline PET/CT in patients with PC showing biochemical recurrence after EBRT as primary treatment is relatively high (87.8 %). (11)C-Choline PET/CT was able to detect extraprostatic disease in the 62.6 % of patients. Considering this high detection rate, (11)C-choline PET/CT could have clinical usefulness in the management of these PC patients, but this should be confirmed in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24346416     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2655-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  29 in total

1.  PSA doubling time for prediction of [(11)C]choline PET/CT findings in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Maria Picchio; Vincenzo Scattoni; Rita Garcia Parra; Alberto Briganti; Luigi Gianolli; Francesco Montorsi; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer.

Authors:  James Mohler; Robert R Bahnson; Barry Boston; J Erik Busby; Anthony D'Amico; James A Eastham; Charles A Enke; Daniel George; Eric Mark Horwitz; Robert P Huben; Philip Kantoff; Mark Kawachi; Michael Kuettel; Paul H Lange; Gary Macvicar; Elizabeth R Plimack; Julio M Pow-Sang; Mack Roach; Eric Rohren; Bruce J Roth; Dennis C Shrieve; Matthew R Smith; Sandy Srinivas; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Role of imaging and biopsy to assess local recurrence after definitive treatment for prostate carcinoma (surgery, radiotherapy, cryotherapy, HIFU).

Authors:  Pasquale Martino; Vincenzo Scattoni; Andrea B Galosi; Paolo Consonni; Carlo Trombetta; Silvano Palazzo; Carmen Maccagnano; Giovanni Liguori; Massimo Valentino; Michele Battaglia; Libero Barozzi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Choline PET/CT for prostate cancer: main clinical applications.

Authors:  Chiara Fuccio; Domenico Rubello; Paolo Castellucci; Maria Cristina Marzola; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Role of ¹⁸F-choline PET/CT in suspicion of relapse following definitive radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sotirios Chondrogiannis; Maria Cristina Marzola; Alice Ferretti; Anna Margherita Maffione; Lucia Rampin; Gaia Grassetto; Cristina Nanni; Patrick M Colletti; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  The detection rate of [11C]choline-PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  B J Krause; M Souvatzoglou; M Tuncel; K Herrmann; A K Buck; C Praus; T Schuster; H Geinitz; U Treiber; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Can prostate specific antigen derivatives and pathological parameters predict significant change in expectant management criteria for prostate cancer?

Authors:  Masood A Khan; H Ballentine Carter; Jonathan I Epstein; Michael C Miller; Patricia Landis; Patrick W Walsh; Alan W Partin; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  11C-choline positron emission tomography for the evaluation after treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  I J de Jong; J Pruim; P H Elsinga; W Vaalburg; H J A Mensink
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Limited value of bone scintigraphy and computed tomography in assessing biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Peter A S Johnstone; Nali Pak; Raymond S Lance; J Brantley Thrasher; John P Foley; Robert H Riffenburgh; Judd W Moul
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  18 in total

1.  A Phase I/II Study for Analytic Validation of 89Zr-J591 ImmunoPET as a Molecular Imaging Agent for Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Joseph A O'Donoghue; Jeremy C Durack; Serge K Lyashchenko; Sarah M Cheal; Volkan Beylergil; Robert A Lefkowitz; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Danny F Martinez; Alex Mak Fung; Stephen B Solomon; Mithat Gönen; Glenn Heller; Massimo Loda; David M Nanus; Scott T Tagawa; Jarett L Feldman; Joseph R Osborne; Jason S Lewis; Victor E Reuter; Wolfgang A Weber; Neil H Bander; Howard I Scher; Steven M Larson; Michael J Morris
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for restaging recurrent prostate cancer: which factors are associated with PET/CT detection rate?

Authors:  Francesco Ceci; Christian Uprimny; Bernhard Nilica; Llanos Geraldo; Dorota Kendler; Alexander Kroiss; Jasmin Bektic; Wolfgang Horninger; Peter Lukas; Clemens Decristoforo; Paolo Castellucci; Stefano Fanti; Irene J Virgolini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Prostate cancer: Post-treatment imaging-a desperate need for solid evidence.

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  PET Tracers Beyond FDG in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Cristina Nanni; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.446

5.  Comparison of PSMA-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Zhou; Zhengxing Gou; Renhui Wu; Yuan Yuan; Guiquan Yu; Yigang Zhao
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Uroncor consensus statement: Management of biochemical recurrence after radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer: From biochemical failure to castration resistance.

Authors:  José López Torrecilla; Asunción Hervás; Almudena Zapatero; Antonio Gómez Caamaño; Victor Macías; Ismael Herruzo; Xavier Maldonado; Alfonso Gómez Iturriaga; Francesc Casas; Carmen González San Segundo
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-05-30

7.  Impact of 11C-choline PET/CT on clinical decision making in recurrent prostate cancer: results from a retrospective two-centre trial.

Authors:  Francesco Ceci; Ken Herrmann; Paolo Castellucci; Tiziano Graziani; Christina Bluemel; Riccardo Schiavina; Christian Vollmer; Sabine Droll; Eugenio Brunocilla; Renzo Mazzarotto; Andreas K Buck; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Feasibility and Initial Results: Fluciclovine Positron Emission Tomography/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Baowei Fei; Olayinka A Abiodun-Ojo; Akinyemi A Akintayo; Oladunni Akin-Akintayo; Funmilayo Tade; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Mark M Goodman; David M Schuster
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in Patients With Biochemical Prostate Cancer Recurrence and Negative 18F-Choline-PET/CT.

Authors:  Christina Bluemel; Markus Krebs; Bülent Polat; Fränze Linke; Matthias Eiber; Samuel Samnick; Constantin Lapa; Michael Lassmann; Hubertus Riedmiller; Johannes Czernin; Domenico Rubello; Thorsten Bley; Saskia Kropf; Hans-Juergen Wester; Andreas K Buck; Ken Herrmann
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.794

10.  Recurrent prostate cancer detection with anti-3-[(18)F]FACBC PET/CT: comparison with CT.

Authors:  Oluwaseun A Odewole; Funmilayo I Tade; Peter T Nieh; Bital Savir-Baruch; Ashesh B Jani; Viraj A Master; Peter J Rossi; Raghuveer K Halkar; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Oladunni Akin-Akintayo; Chao Zhang; Zhengjia Chen; Mark M Goodman; David M Schuster
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.