PURPOSE: Spinal needle injections are widely applied to alleviate back pain and for anesthesia. Current treatment is performed either blindly with palpation or using fluoroscopy or computed tomography (CT). Both fluoroscopy and CT guidance expose patients to ionizing radiation. Ultrasound (US) guidance for spinal needle procedures is becoming more prevalent as an alternative. It is challenging to use US as the sole imaging modality for intraoperative guidance of spine needle injections due to the acoustic shadows created by the bony structures of the vertebra that limit visibility of the target areas for injection. We propose registration of CT and the US images to augment anatomical visualization for the clinician during spinal interventions guided by US. METHODS: The proposed method involves automatic global and multi-vertebrae registration to find the closest alignment between CT and US data. This is performed by maximizing the similarity between the two modalities using voxel intensity information as well as features extracted from the input volumes. In our method, the lumbar spine is first globally aligned between the CT and US data using intensity-based registration followed by point-based registration. To account for possible curvature change of the spine between the CT and US volumes, a multi-vertebrae registration step is also performed. Springs are used to constrain the movement of the individually transformed vertebrae to ensure the optimal alignment is a pose of the lumbar spine that is physically possible. RESULTS: Evaluation of the algorithm is performed on 10 clinical patient datasets. The registration approach was able to align CT and US datasets from initial misalignments of up to 25 mm, with a mean TRE of 1.37 mm. These results suggest that the proposed approach has the potential to offer a sufficiently accurate registration between clinical CT and US data.
PURPOSE: Spinal needle injections are widely applied to alleviate back pain and for anesthesia. Current treatment is performed either blindly with palpation or using fluoroscopy or computed tomography (CT). Both fluoroscopy and CT guidance expose patients to ionizing radiation. Ultrasound (US) guidance for spinal needle procedures is becoming more prevalent as an alternative. It is challenging to use US as the sole imaging modality for intraoperative guidance of spine needle injections due to the acoustic shadows created by the bony structures of the vertebra that limit visibility of the target areas for injection. We propose registration of CT and the US images to augment anatomical visualization for the clinician during spinal interventions guided by US. METHODS: The proposed method involves automatic global and multi-vertebrae registration to find the closest alignment between CT and US data. This is performed by maximizing the similarity between the two modalities using voxel intensity information as well as features extracted from the input volumes. In our method, the lumbar spine is first globally aligned between the CT and US data using intensity-based registration followed by point-based registration. To account for possible curvature change of the spine between the CT and US volumes, a multi-vertebrae registration step is also performed. Springs are used to constrain the movement of the individually transformed vertebrae to ensure the optimal alignment is a pose of the lumbar spine that is physically possible. RESULTS: Evaluation of the algorithm is performed on 10 clinical patient datasets. The registration approach was able to align CT and US datasets from initial misalignments of up to 25 mm, with a mean TRE of 1.37 mm. These results suggest that the proposed approach has the potential to offer a sufficiently accurate registration between clinical CT and US data.
Authors: Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Fiona M Fennessy; Junichi Tokuda; Nobuhiko Hata; William M Wells; Ron Kikinis; Clare M Tempany Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: J L Herring; B M Dawant; C R Maurer; D M Muratore; R L Galloway; J M Fitzpatrick Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Sean Gill; Purang Abolmaesumi; Gabor Fichtinger; Jonathan Boisvert; David Pichora; Dan Borshneck; Parvin Mousavi Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: John Moore; Colin Clarke; Daniel Bainbridge; Chris Wedlake; Andrew Wiles; Danielle Pace; Terry Peters Journal: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Date: 2009
Authors: Brandon Chan; Jason Auyeung; John F Rudan; Randy E Ellis; Manuela Kunz Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-03-26 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Songbai Ji; Xiaoyao Fan; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts; Sohail K Mirza; S Scott Lollis Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Houssem-Eddine Gueziri; Simon Drouin; Charles X B Yan; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Nazlı Tümer; Aimee C Kok; Frans M Vos; Geert J Streekstra; Christian Askeland; Gabrielle J M Tuijthof; Amir A Zadpoor Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2018-07-21 Impact factor: 3.576