Literature DB >> 26171163

MGMT promoter methylation in serum and cerebrospinal fluid as a tumor-specific biomarker of glioma.

Zheng Wang1, Wei Jiang1, Yahong Wang1, Yang Guo1, Zheng Cong1, Fangfang DU1, Bin Song1.   

Abstract

O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation is a conventional technique to predict the prognosis or individualized treatment of glioma in tumor tissue following surgery or biopsy. However, the technique cannot be applied in those glioma patients with concomitant neurological dysfunctions or advanced age. The present study aimed to find a new minimally invasive and efficient alternative method for the detection of MGMT promoter methylation. The expression of MGMT promoter methylation was assessed in peripheral blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and compared to the corresponding tumor tissue from glioma patients. The 89 patients in the study [32 World Health Organization (WHO) grade II, 19 WHO grade III and 38 WHO grade IV) were pathologically-diagnosed glioma and received radiation therapy following sample collection. The resected glioma tumor tissue (89), corresponding serum (89) and CSF (78) samples were collected for the detection of MGMT promoter methylation using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. The sensitivity and specificity of detecting MGMT promoter methylation in CSF and serum were compared. Among the tumor tissue samples, 51/89 (57.3%) showed MGMT promoter methylation. The specificity of the detection in the CSF and serum samples reached 100%. The sensitivity of MGMT promoter methylation detection in CSF and serum were 26/40 (65.0%) and 19/51 (37.3%), respectively (P<0.05). In the WHO II, III and IV subgroups, the sensitivities of MGMT promoter methylation detection using CSF were 8/12 (66.7%), 11/18 (61.1%) and 7/10 (70.0%), respectively, which were significantly higher than the sensitivities using serum (7/21, 33.3%; 7/19, 36.8%; and 5/11, 45.5%, respectively P<0.05). Among patients with residual postoperative tumors, the sensitivities of detecting MGMT promoter methylation using CSF and serum were 18/25 (72.0%) and 10/24 (41.7%), respectively, both of which were significantly higher than the corresponding values for patients without residual tumors (8/15, 53.3% and 6/19, 31.6%, respectively; P<0.05). The detection of MGMT promoter methylation in CSF specimens shows higher sensitivity compared to the serum for glioma patients. Assessment of MGMT promoter methylation in CSF may provide a promising clinical methodology for early diagnosis, individual treatment, monitoring of recurrence and prognosis for glioma patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase; cerebrospinal fluid; circulating DNA; glioma; tumor-specific molecular marker

Year:  2015        PMID: 26171163      PMCID: PMC4487030          DOI: 10.3892/br.2015.462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Rep        ISSN: 2049-9434


  28 in total

Review 1.  Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients.

Authors:  Heidi Schwarzenbach; Dave S B Hoon; Klaus Pantel
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Temozolomide in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and poor performance status: an ANOCEF phase II trial.

Authors:  Jaime Gállego Pérez-Larraya; François Ducray; Olivier Chinot; Isabelle Catry-Thomas; Luc Taillandier; Jean-Sébastien Guillamo; Chantal Campello; Annick Monjour; Stéphanie Cartalat-Carel; Maryline Barrie; Aymeri Huchet; Patrick Beauchesne; Mona Matta; Karima Mokhtari; Marie-Laure Tanguy; Jérôme Honnorat; Jean-Yves Delattre
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Chemoradiotherapy of newly diagnosed glioblastoma with intensified temozolomide.

Authors:  Markus Weiler; Christian Hartmann; Dorothee Wiewrodt; Ulrich Herrlinger; Thierry Gorlia; Oliver Bähr; Richard Meyermann; Michael Bamberg; Marcos Tatagiba; Andreas von Deimling; Michael Weller; Wolfgang Wick
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics.

Authors:  Frank Diehl; Kerstin Schmidt; Michael A Choti; Katharine Romans; Steven Goodman; Meng Li; Katherine Thornton; Nishant Agrawal; Lori Sokoll; Steve A Szabo; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Luis A Diaz
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 5.  Circulating nucleic acids in plasma/serum.

Authors:  Jason C H Tsang; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.306

6.  DNA mismatch repair and O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase analysis and response to Temodal in newly diagnosed malignant glioma.

Authors:  H S Friedman; R E McLendon; T Kerby; M Dugan; S H Bigner; A J Henry; D M Ashley; J Krischer; S Lovell; K Rasheed; F Marchev; A J Seman; I Cokgor; J Rich; E Stewart; O M Colvin; J M Provenzale; D D Bigner; M M Haglund; A H Friedman; P L Modrich
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial.

Authors:  Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Martin J B Taphoorn; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Anouk Allgeier; Barbara Fisher; Karl Belanger; Peter Hau; Alba A Brandes; Johanna Gijtenbeek; Christine Marosi; Charles J Vecht; Karima Mokhtari; Pieter Wesseling; Salvador Villa; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Thierry Gorlia; Michael Weller; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; René-Olivier Mirimanoff
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Multimarker circulating DNA assay for assessing blood of prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Eiji Sunami; Masaru Shinozaki; Celestia S Higano; Robert Wollman; Tanya B Dorff; Steven J Tucker; Steve R Martinez; Ryuich Mizuno; Frederick R Singer; Dave S B Hoon
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Quantitative analysis of circulating methylated DNA as a biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  K C Allen Chan; Paul B S Lai; Tony S K Mok; Henry L Y Chan; Chunming Ding; S W Yeung; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Validation of real-time methylation-specific PCR to determine O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene promoter methylation in glioma.

Authors:  Ilse Vlassenbroeck; Stéphane Califice; Annie-Claire Diserens; Eugenia Migliavacca; Josef Straub; Ivano Di Stefano; Fabrice Moreau; Marie-France Hamou; Isabelle Renard; Mauro Delorenzi; Bruno Flamion; James DiGuiseppi; Katja Bierau; Monika E Hegi
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.568

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  The potential of cerebrospinal fluid-based liquid biopsy approaches in CNS tumors.

Authors:  Austin K Mattox; Hai Yan; Chetan Bettegowda
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Carmustine Wafers Implantation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma: Is It Still an Option?

Authors:  Luca Ricciardi; Ivana Manini; Daniela Cesselli; Sokol Trungu; Amedeo Piazza; Antonella Mangraviti; Massimo Miscusi; Antonino Raco; Tamara Ius
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 3.  MGMT and Whole-Genome DNA Methylation Impacts on Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy of Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Authors:  Rosa Della Monica; Mariella Cuomo; Michela Buonaiuto; Davide Costabile; Raduan Ahmed Franca; Marialaura Del Basso De Caro; Giuseppe Catapano; Lorenzo Chiariotti; Roberta Visconti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 4.  Liquid Biopsy Strategies to Distinguish Progression from Pseudoprogression and Radiation Necrosis in Glioblastomas.

Authors:  Anudeep Yekula; Koushik Muralidharan; Zachary S Rosh; Anna E Youngkin; Keiko M Kang; Leonora Balaj; Bob S Carter
Journal:  Adv Biosyst       Date:  2020-06-02

Review 5.  Current Advances and Future Perspectives of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biopsy in Midline Brain Malignancies.

Authors:  Yimin Pan; Wenyong Long; Qing Liu
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-11-29

Review 6.  ctDNA-Based Liquid Biopsy of Cerebrospinal Fluid in Brain Cancer.

Authors:  Laura Escudero; Francisco Martínez-Ricarte; Joan Seoane
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 7.  Prognostic and Predictive Epigenetic Biomarkers in Oncology.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kamińska; Ewelina Nalejska; Marta Kubiak; Joanna Wojtysiak; Łukasz Żołna; Janusz Kowalewski; Marzena Anna Lewandowska
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.074

8.  Pyrosequencing versus methylation-specific PCR for assessment of MGMT methylation in tumor and blood samples of glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Anna Estival; Carolina Sanz; Jose-Luis Ramirez; Jose Maria Velarde; Marta Domenech; Cristina Carrato; Ramón de Las Peñas; Miguel Gil-Gil; Juan Sepúlveda; Roser Armengol; Isaac Cardiel; Alfonso Berrocal; Raquel Luque; Ana Herrero; Carmen Balana
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Blood-Based Biomarkers for Glioma in the Context of Gliomagenesis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hamza Ali; Romée Harting; Ralph de Vries; Meedie Ali; Thomas Wurdinger; Myron G Best
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Alu hypomethylation and MGMT hypermethylation in serum as biomarkers of glioma.

Authors:  Mingjie Gong; Wei Shi; Jing Qi; Guoping Shao; Zhenghua Shi; Junxiang Wang; Jian Chen; Rongtao Chu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.