Literature DB >> 21709196

Temozolomide in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and poor performance status: an ANOCEF phase II trial.

Jaime Gállego Pérez-Larraya1, François Ducray, Olivier Chinot, Isabelle Catry-Thomas, Luc Taillandier, Jean-Sébastien Guillamo, Chantal Campello, Annick Monjour, Stéphanie Cartalat-Carel, Maryline Barrie, Aymeri Huchet, Patrick Beauchesne, Mona Matta, Karima Mokhtari, Marie-Laure Tanguy, Jérôme Honnorat, Jean-Yves Delattre.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The management of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in elderly patients with poor performance status is not well established. A trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of temozolomide alone in this population was undertaken. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients age 70 years or older with newly diagnosed GBM and postoperative Karnofsky performance score (KPS) less than 70 were eligible for this nonrandomized phase II trial. Treatment consisted of 150 to 200 mg/m(2)/d temozolomide for 5 days every 4 weeks until disease progression. Radiotherapy was not administered. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), safety, quality of life, and cognition.
RESULTS: Seventy patients (median age, 77 years; median KPS, 60) were enrolled between July 2007 and February 2009. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 13% and 14% of patients, respectively. Median PFS was 16 weeks (95% CI, 10 to 20 weeks), and median OS was 25 weeks (95% CI, 19 to 28 weeks), comparing favorably with a 12- to 16-week OS expected from a purely supportive approach. Twenty-three patients (33%) improved their KPS by 10 or more points, and 18 (26%) became capable of self-care (KPS ≥ 70). Overall quality of life and cognition improved over time before disease progression. In the 31 tumors evaluated for O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, a methylated status indicated longer PFS (26 v 11 weeks; P = .03) and OS (31 v 19 weeks; P = .03).
CONCLUSION: Temozolomide has an acceptable tolerance in elderly patients with GBM and KPS less than 70. It is associated with improvement of functional status in 33% of patients and appears to increase survival compared with supportive care alone, especially in patients with methylated MGMT promoter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21709196     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.8086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  89 in total

Review 1.  Treatment considerations for MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jennie W Taylor; David Schiff
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  A meta-analysis of temozolomide versus radiotherapy in elderly glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  An-An Yin; Sang Cai; Yu Dong; Lu-Hua Zhang; Bo-Lin Liu; Jin-Xiang Cheng; Xiang Zhang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Treatment outcomes in glioblastoma patients aged 76 years or older: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Takeo Uzuka; Kenichiro Asano; Toshio Sasajima; Kaori Sakurada; Toshihiro Kumabe; Takaaki Beppu; Masahiro Ichikawa; Chifumi Kitanaka; Hiroshi Aoki; Kiyoshi Saito; Kuniaki Ogasawara; Teiji Tominaga; Kazuo Mizoi; Hiroki Ohkuma; Yukihiko Fujii; Takamasa Kayama
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Metronomic chemotherapy with daily low-dose temozolomide and celecoxib in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Grit Welzel; Julian Gehweiler; Stefanie Brehmer; Jens-Uwe Appelt; Andreas von Deimling; Marcel Seiz-Rosenhagen; Peter Schmiedek; Frederik Wenz; Frank A Giordano
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  MGMT promoter methylation in serum and cerebrospinal fluid as a tumor-specific biomarker of glioma.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Wei Jiang; Yahong Wang; Yang Guo; Zheng Cong; Fangfang DU; Bin Song
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2015-05-13

6.  Incidence, risk factors, and reasons for hospitalization among glioblastoma patients receiving chemoradiation.

Authors:  Rifaquat Rahman; Paul J Catalano; David A Reardon; Andrew D Norden; Patrick Y Wen; Eudocia Q Lee; Lakshmi Nayak; Rameen Beroukhim; Ian F Dunn; Alexandra J Golby; Mark D Johnson; E Antonio Chiocca; Elizabeth B Claus; Brian M Alexander; Nils D Arvold
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Recurrent glioblastomas in the elderly after maximal first-line treatment: does preserved overall condition warrant a maximal second-line treatment?

Authors:  Marc Zanello; Alexandre Roux; Renata Ursu; Sophie Peeters; Luc Bauchet; Georges Noel; Jacques Guyotat; Pierre-Jean Le Reste; Thierry Faillot; Fabien Litre; Nicolas Desse; Evelyne Emery; Antoine Petit; Johann Peltier; Jimmy Voirin; François Caire; Jean-Luc Barat; Jean-Rodolphe Vignes; Philippe Menei; Olivier Langlois; Edouard Dezamis; Antoine Carpentier; Phong Dam Hieu; Philippe Metellus; Johan Pallud
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 8.  Personalized care in neuro-oncology coming of age: why we need MGMT and 1p/19q testing for malignant glioma patients in clinical practice.

Authors:  Michael Weller; Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Martin van den Bent; Joerg C Tonn; Marc Sanson; Wolfgang Wick; Guido Reifenberger
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 9.  Radiation therapy for older adults with glioblastoma: radical treatment, palliative treatment, or no treatment at all?

Authors:  Giuseppe Minniti; Riccardo Maurizi Enrici
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Treatment Patterns, Survival, and Healthcare Costs of Patients with Malignant Gliomas in a Large US Commercially Insured Population.

Authors:  Saurabh Ray; Machaon M Bonafede; Nimish A Mohile
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2014-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.