| Literature DB >> 29100349 |
Mingjie Gong1, Wei Shi2, Jing Qi3, Guoping Shao1, Zhenghua Shi1, Junxiang Wang1, Jian Chen2, Rongtao Chu1.
Abstract
In order to improve prognosis of glioma patients, better tools are required for early diagnosis and treatment. Serum cell-free DNA methylation levels of Alu, MGMT, P16, RASSF1A from 124 glioma patients and 58 healthy controls were detected by the bisulfite sequencing. The median methylation level of Alu was 46.15% (IQR, 36.57%-54.00%) and 60.85% (IQR, 57.23%-65.68%) in glioma patients and healthy controls respectively. The median methylation level of MGMT in glioma samples was 64.65% (IQR, 54.87%-74.37%) compared to 38.30% (IQR, 34.13%-45.45%) in healthy controls, and all revealed significant differences including P16. However, the median methylation level of RASSF1A was not significantly altered in glioma patients. Furthermore, the methylation levels of Alu and MGMT in serum had a good diagnostic value, and was higher than P16. Interestingly, combination of Alu and MGMT identified additional patients, which were missed by either diagnosis alone. In the Alu group, the patients with high levels were associated with an increased survival rate compared to those who with low levels, with similar results observed in the MGMT group. In the present study, we demonstrated that the methylation level of Alu and MGMT in serum had a better diagnostic value than P16. Moreover, combined analysis of Alu and MGMT showed higher sensitivity for glioma diagnosis. Therefore, both serum Alu and MGMT methylation levels may represent a novel prognostic factor for glioma patients.Entities:
Keywords: Alu; DNA; MGMT; glioma; serum
Year: 2017 PMID: 29100349 PMCID: PMC5652743 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1(A) Methylation level of Alu: The median methylation level of Alu was 46.15% (IQR, 36.57%–54.00%) and 60.85% (IQR, 57.23%–65.68%) in glioma patients and healthy controls. (B) Methylation level of MGMT: The median methylation level of MGMT was 64.65% (IQR, 54.87%–74.37%) and 38.30% (IQR, 34.13%–45.45%) in glioma patients and healthy controls. (C) Methylation level of RASSF1A: The median methylation level of RASSF1A was 15.50% (IQR, 5.85%–24.70%) and 11.40% (IQR, 6.78%–20.60%) in glioma patients and healthy controls. (D) Methylation level of P16: The median methylation level of P16 was 31.35% (IQR, 22.58%–36.93%) and 26.65% (IQR, 17.15%–36.05%) in glioma patients and healthy controls.
Figure 2(A) ROC curve of Alu: The Area Under Curve was 0.904. (B) ROC curve of MGMT: The Area Under Curve was 0.962. (C) ROC curve of P16: The Area Under Curve was 0.599.
Figure 3Combination of Alu and MGMT: Combination of Alu and MGMTcould improve the rate of diagnosis
Figure 4(A) Methylaiton level of Alu: The median methylation level of Alu in high-grade glioma was 37.90% (IQR, 34.15%–48.20%), while the low-grade was 52.20% (IQR, 43.53%–55.43%). (B) Methylaiton level of MGMT: The median methylation level of MGMT in high-grade glioma was 71.75% (IQR, 63.75%–75.10%), while the low-grade was 56.55% (IQR, 52.33%–65.48%).
Figure 5(A) Alu methylaiton level and overall survival. (B) MGMT methylaiton level and overall survival.
Patients’ chracteristics
| Characteristic | No. of patients (%) |
|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis, years | |
| ≤50 | 46 (37.10) |
| <50 | 78 (62.90) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 55 (44.35) |
| Female | 69 (55.65) |
| Karnofsky performance score(KPS) | |
| <70 | 26 (20.97) |
| ≥70 | 98 (79.03) |
| Tumor diameter | |
| ≤3cm | 39 (31.45) |
| <3cm | 85 (68.55) |
| Tumor location (region) | |
| Frontal | 45 (36.29) |
| Temporal | 37 (29.84) |
| Parietal | 29 (23.39) |
| Occipital | 10 (8.06) |
| Other | 3 (2.42) |
| Tumor location (side) | |
| Left | 38 (30.65) |
| Right | 46 (37.10) |
| Middle | 40 (32.26) |
| WHO grade | |
| Low grade | 60 (48.39) |
| High grade | 64 (51.61) |