Literature DB >> 26167342

A Comparison of the Effects of Different Types of Laryngoscope on the Cervical Motions: Randomized Clinical Trial.

Alkin Çolak1, Elif Çopuroğlu1, Ali Yılmaz2, Sevtap Hekimoğlu Şahin1, Nesrin Turan3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of cervical injury among all trauma patients is 3.1%. The most important point during intubation of those patients is not to increase the cervical injury. AIMS: In this study, we hypothesize that there will be a minimal cervical extension during a laryngoscopy with the use of optical view laryngoscopes. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: One hundred and fifty adult patients with ASA physical status I to III were enrolled in our study. After routine anesthesia induction, we randomly assigned the patients into three groups according to the type of laryngoscope. Macintosh type, Truview EVO2(®) type and Airtraq® type laryngoscopes were used in Group DL (n=50), Group TW (n=50) and Group ATQ (n=50), respectively. After applying general anesthesia induction and mask ventilation, all of the patients were positioned in the neutral position. An inclinometer was placed on the forehead of the patients. Then, the extension angle during intubation and the Cormack-Lehane Score were measured and the time to intubation was recorded.
RESULTS: One of the 50 patients in the DL Group, 2 of the 50 patients in the TW Group, and 4 of the 50 patients in the ATQ Group were excluded from the study because of the failure of intubation at defined times. The angle of cervical extension during laryngoscopy was found to be 27.24±6.71, 18.08±7.53, and 14.54±4.09 degrees in the Groups DL, TV and ATQ, respectively; these differences also had statistical significance (p=0.000). The duration of intubation was found to be 13.59±5.49, 23.60±15.23, and 29.80±13.82 seconds in Groups DL, TV and ATQ, respectively (p=0.000).
CONCLUSION: A minimal cervical motion was obtained during tracheal intubation with the use of Truview EVO2® and Airtraq® types of laryngoscope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02191904).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airtraq®; Macintosh; Truview EVO2®; airway management; intratracheal equipment; intubation

Year:  2015        PMID: 26167342      PMCID: PMC4432698          DOI: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.15335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Balkan Med J        ISSN: 2146-3123            Impact factor:   2.021


  20 in total

1.  Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope.

Authors:  Timothy P Turkstra; Rosemary A Craen; David M Pelz; Adrian W Gelb
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Truview video laryngoscope in patients with difficult airways.

Authors:  Sanae Matsumoto; Takashi Asai; Koh Shingu
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 3.  Airway management in adults after cervical spine trauma.

Authors:  Edward T Crosby
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  A comparison of the Truview blade with the Macintosh blade in adult patients.

Authors:  M Barak; P Philipchuck; P Abecassis; Y Katz
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Comparison of the Glidescope, the Pentax AWS, and the Truview EVO2 with the Macintosh laryngoscope in experienced anaesthetists: a manikin study.

Authors:  M A Malik; C O'Donoghue; J Carney; C H Maharaj; B H Harte; J G Laffey
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 6.  Airtraq optical laryngoscope: advantages and disadvantages.

Authors:  Kemal Tolga Saracoglu; Zeynep Eti; Fevzi Yilmaz Gogus
Journal:  Middle East J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2013-06

7.  Comparison of the C-MAC®, Airtraq®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients undergoing tracheal intubation with cervical spine immobilization.

Authors:  J McElwain; J G Laffey
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Incidence and clinical predictors for tracheostomy after cervical spinal cord injury: a National Trauma Databank review.

Authors:  Bernardino C Branco; David Plurad; Donald J Green; Kenji Inaba; Lydia Lam; Ramon Cestero; Marko Bukur; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-01

9.  Cervical spine motion during airway management: a cinefluoroscopic study of the posteriorly destabilized third cervical vertebrae in human cadavers.

Authors:  J Brimacombe; C Keller; K H Künzel; O Gaber; M Boehler; F Pühringer
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  A randomized controlled study to evaluate and compare Truview blade with Macintosh blade for laryngoscopy and intubation under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Ramesh T Timanaykar; Lakesh K Anand; Sanjeev Palta
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jan Hansel; Andrew M Rogers; Sharon R Lewis; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 2.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Andrew R Butler; Joshua Parker; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.