Literature DB >> 21586444

Comparison of the C-MAC®, Airtraq®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients undergoing tracheal intubation with cervical spine immobilization.

J McElwain1, J G Laffey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed at comparing the performance of the C-MAC®, Airtraq®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes when performing tracheal intubation in patients undergoing neck immobilization using manual inline axial cervical spine stabilization.
METHODS: Ninety consenting patients presenting for surgery requiring tracheal intubation were randomly assigned to undergo intubation using a C-MAC® (n=30), Airtraq® (n=29), or Macintosh (n=31) laryngoscope. All patients were intubated by one anaesthetist experienced in the use of each laryngoscope.
RESULTS: The Airtraq® laryngoscope performed best in these patients, reducing the Intubation Difficulty Scale score, improving the Cormack and Lehane glottic view, and reducing the need for optimization manoeuvres, compared with both the Macintosh and the C-MAC®. The C-MAC® and Macintosh laryngoscopes performed similarly. There were no differences in success rates or haemodynamic profiles post-intubation between any of the devices tested.
CONCLUSIONS: The Airtraq® laryngoscope performed better than the C-MAC® and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients undergoing cervical immobilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21586444     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  28 in total

1.  A Comparison of the Effects of Different Types of Laryngoscope on the Cervical Motions: Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Alkin Çolak; Elif Çopuroğlu; Ali Yılmaz; Sevtap Hekimoğlu Şahin; Nesrin Turan
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.021

2.  Clinical evaluation of C-MAC videolaryngoscope with or without use of stylet for endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization.

Authors:  Nidhi Gupta; Girija Prasad Rath; Hemanshu Prabhakar
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Comparison of Macintosh, McCoy and C-MAC D-Blade video laryngoscope intubation by prehospital emergency health workers: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ahmet Yildirim; Hasan A Kiraz; İbrahim Ağaoğlu; Okhan Akdur
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jarrod Mosier; Stephen Chiu; Asad E Patanwala; John C Sakles
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Comparison of the C-MAC D-Blade, Conventional C-MAC, and Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Simulated Easy and Difficult Airways.

Authors:  Alper Kılıçaslan; Ahmet Topal; Atilla Erol; Sema Tuncer Uzun
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2014-08-01

6.  Evaluation of a smartphone camera system to enable visualization and image transmission to aid tracheal intubation with the Airtraq(®) laryngoscope.

Authors:  Delice Weishan Lee; Swapna Thampi; Eric Peng Huat Yap; Eugene Hern Choon Liu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Fluoroscopic Comparison of Cervical Spine Motion Using LMA CTrach, C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope.

Authors:  Tülay Şahin; Zehra İpek Arslan; Gür Akansel; Onur Balaban; Derya Berk; Mine Solak; Kamil Toker
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 8.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Andrew R Butler; Joshua Parker; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-15

9.  SWIVIT--Swiss video-intubation trial evaluating video-laryngoscopes in a simulated difficult airway scenario: study protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial in Switzerland.

Authors:  Lorenz Theiler; Kristina Hermann; Patrick Schoettker; Georges Savoldelli; Natalie Urwyler; Maren Kleine-Brueggeney; Kristopher L Arheart; Robert Greif
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Prevention of tooth and gum damage: novel application of airtraq laryngoscope.

Authors:  Mahdi Najafi
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2011-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.