Literature DB >> 31469188

The objective function controversy for group testing: Much ado about nothing?

Brianna D Hitt1, Christopher R Bilder1, Joshua M Tebbs2, Christopher S McMahan3.   

Abstract

Group testing is an indispensable tool for laboratories when testing high volumes of clinical specimens for infectious diseases. An important decision that needs to be made prior to implementation is determining what group sizes to use. In best practice, an objective function is chosen and then minimized to determine an optimal set of these group sizes, known as the optimal testing configuration (OTC). There are a few options for objective functions, and they differ based on how the expected number of tests, assay characteristics, and testing constraints are taken into account. These varied options have led to a recent controversy in the literature regarding which of two different objective functions is better. In our paper, we examine these objective functions over a number of realistic situations for infectious disease testing. We show that this controversy may be much ado about nothing because the OTCs and corresponding results (eg, number of tests and accuracy) are largely the same for standard testing algorithms in a wide variety of situations.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binary response; infectious disease; pooled testing; screening; sensitivity; specificity

Year:  2019        PMID: 31469188      PMCID: PMC6800791          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  26 in total

1.  Rejoinder to "Reader reaction: A note on the evaluation of group testing algorithms in the presence of misclassification".

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Routine detection of acute HIV infection through RNA pooling: survey of current practice in the United States.

Authors:  Michelle Sherlock; Nicola M Zetola; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Improvement of sampling plans for Salmonella detection in pooled table eggs by use of real-time PCR.

Authors:  Frédérique Pasquali; Alessandra De Cesare; Antonio Valero; John Emerdhal Olsen; Gerardo Manfreda
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 5.277

4.  Two-dimensional informative array testing.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Informative Dorfman screening.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-11

7.  Informative Retesting.

Authors:  Christopher R Bilder; Joshua M Tebbs; Peng Chen
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 8.  Introduction of Chlamydia trachomatis screening for young women in Germany.

Authors:  Monika Mund; Gabriele Sander; Peter Potthoff; Helga Schicht; Katja Matthias
Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.584

9.  Rejoinder to "Reader reaction: A note on the evaluation of group testing algorithms in the presence of misclassification".

Authors:  Michael G Hudgens
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Blood screening for influenza.

Authors:  Michael Kai Hourfar; Anna Themann; Markus Eickmann; Pilaipan Puthavathana; Thomas Laue; Erhard Seifried; Michael Schmidt
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  4 in total

1.  Simulation of group testing scenarios can boost COVID-19 screening power.

Authors:  Vinicius Henrique da Silva; Carolina Purcell Goes; Priscila Anchieta Trevisoli; Raquel Lello; Luan Gaspar Clemente; Talita Bonato de Almeida; Juliana Petrini; Luiz Lehmann Coutinho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Is group testing ready for prime-time in disease identification?

Authors:  Gregory Haber; Yaakov Malinovsky; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Assessment of Specimen Pooling to Conserve SARS CoV-2 Testing Resources.

Authors:  Baha Abdalhamid; Christopher R Bilder; Emily L McCutchen; Steven H Hinrichs; Scott A Koepsell; Peter C Iwen
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Pooled testing of traced contacts under superspreading dynamics.

Authors:  Stratis Tsirtsis; Abir De; Lars Lorch; Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.475

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.