Debbie S Kuo1, Yvonne Ou1, Bennie H Jeng2, Robert Bhisitkul1, Jay M Stewart1, Jacque L Duncan1, Ying Han3. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: hany@vision.ucsf.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of scleral pneumatonometry as an alternative for corneal measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) over a broad range of IOPs. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The study was conducted in the University of California, San Francisco, Retina Clinic between August and November 2013 in 33 adult patients (age range, 34-94 years; mean ± standard deviation, 74.1±13.4 years) receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal injections, which transiently increase IOP. METHODS: Corneal pachymetry and serial corneal and temporal scleral pneumatonometry (baseline, immediately after, and 10, 20, and 30 minutes after injection) were collected. One-time baseline corneal and scleral pneumatonometry readings were obtained in the noninjected eye. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation analysis and a Bland-Altman plot were used to evaluate reliability and agreement between scleral and corneal measurements of IOP. A linear mixed model was used to determine the relationship between measurements and to perform covariate analyses. RESULTS: Scleral and corneal pneumatonometry showed nearly 1:1 linear correlation, although scleral pneumatonometry was biased toward higher values (r = 0.94; P < 0.001). Scleral pneumatonometry averaged 9.0 mmHg higher than corneal pneumatonometry (95% limits of agreement, -1.5 to 19.5 mmHg). A linear mixed model resulted in the following equation: corneal IOP = 1.04 × scleral IOP - 10.37. Age, central corneal thickness, laterality, and glaucoma and lens status did not impact this relationship. The difference between corneal and scleral pneumotonometry was correlated between the two eyes of individual patients (r = 0.75; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Differences between serial scleral measurements reflect differences between serial corneal measurements. Scleral pneumatonometry should be considered as an alternative to corneal pneumatonometry for following patients in whom corneal measurements are unreliable or unobtainable.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of scleral pneumatonometry as an alternative for corneal measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) over a broad range of IOPs. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The study was conducted in the University of California, San Francisco, Retina Clinic between August and November 2013 in 33 adult patients (age range, 34-94 years; mean ± standard deviation, 74.1±13.4 years) receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal injections, which transiently increase IOP. METHODS: Corneal pachymetry and serial corneal and temporal scleral pneumatonometry (baseline, immediately after, and 10, 20, and 30 minutes after injection) were collected. One-time baseline corneal and scleral pneumatonometry readings were obtained in the noninjected eye. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation analysis and a Bland-Altman plot were used to evaluate reliability and agreement between scleral and corneal measurements of IOP. A linear mixed model was used to determine the relationship between measurements and to perform covariate analyses. RESULTS: Scleral and corneal pneumatonometry showed nearly 1:1 linear correlation, although scleral pneumatonometry was biased toward higher values (r = 0.94; P < 0.001). Scleral pneumatonometry averaged 9.0 mmHg higher than corneal pneumatonometry (95% limits of agreement, -1.5 to 19.5 mmHg). A linear mixed model resulted in the following equation: corneal IOP = 1.04 × scleral IOP - 10.37. Age, central corneal thickness, laterality, and glaucoma and lens status did not impact this relationship. The difference between corneal and scleral pneumotonometry was correlated between the two eyes of individual patients (r = 0.75; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Differences between serial scleral measurements reflect differences between serial corneal measurements. Scleral pneumatonometry should be considered as an alternative to corneal pneumatonometry for following patients in whom corneal measurements are unreliable or unobtainable.
Authors: Roheena Kamyar; Jennifer S Weizer; Fernando Heitor de Paula; Joshua D Stein; Sayoko E Moroi; Denise John; David C Musch; Shahzad I Mian Journal: Cornea Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Charles C Lin; Aiyin Chen; Bennie H Jeng; Travis C Porco; Yvonne Ou; Ying Han Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ioannis G Pallikaris; George D Kymionis; Harilaos S Ginis; George A Kounis; Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Mohsin H Ali; Mark S Dikopf; Anthony G Finder; Ahmad A Aref; Thasarat Vajaranant; Jose de la Cruz; Maria Soledad Cortina Journal: Cornea Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Jennifer Swingle Fogt; Cherie B Nau; Muriel Schornack; Ellen Shorter; Amy Nau; Jennifer S Harthan Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 2.106