Literature DB >> 29474296

Assessment of Glaucomatous Damage After Boston Keratoprosthesis Implantation Based on Digital Planimetric Quantification of Visual Fields and Optic Nerve Head Imaging.

Mohsin H Ali1, Mark S Dikopf, Anthony G Finder, Ahmad A Aref, Thasarat Vajaranant, Jose de la Cruz, Maria Soledad Cortina.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate glaucomatous damage in Boston keratoprosthesis type I (KPro) patients through structural analysis of the optic nerve head and digital planimetric quantification of Goldmann visual fields, a novel method of monitoring perimetric changes in KPro patients.
METHODS: Records of patients undergoing KPro implantation from 2007 to 2015 at a single institution were reviewed. Parameters related to glaucoma status and KPro outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes from 21 patients met inclusion criteria, with mean follow-up of 49.4 months (range 15-90). Mean results for the following parameters before KPro implantation and at last follow-up were (pre-KPro; at last follow-up): best-corrected visual acuity (2.07; 0.70 logMAR), number of glaucoma medications (1.14; 1.05), intraocular pressure (IOP) (18.4; 18.4 mm Hg), vertical cup-to-disc ratio (C/D) (0.48; 0.50), and horizontal C/D (0.52; 0.52). IOP-lowering procedures were performed pre-KPro (5/22), concurrently with KPro (10/22), post-KPro (6/22), or never (6/22). An increase in C/D ≥0.1 and loss of V4e isopter area >30% occurred in 22.7% and 12.5%, respectively. Development of post-KPro glaucoma, progression of preexisting or post-KPro glaucoma, and no glaucoma development as evidenced by an objective assessment of structural and functional parameters were seen in 2/22 (9.1%), 7/22 (31.8%), and 6/22 (27.3%) eyes, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should strive to vigilantly monitor for glaucoma despite the inherent difficulties in tonometry, optic nerve visualization and imaging, and visual field testing in KPro patients. Meticulous glaucoma surveillance with structural and functional testing combined with earlier IOP-lowering surgical intervention may result in decreased rates of glaucomatous vision loss in KPro patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29474296      PMCID: PMC5878109          DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  27 in total

1.  Glaucoma associated with Boston type I keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Roheena Kamyar; Jennifer S Weizer; Fernando Heitor de Paula; Joshua D Stein; Sayoko E Moroi; Denise John; David C Musch; Shahzad I Mian
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Boston Keratoprosthesis: Outcomes and Complications: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors:  W Barry Lee; Roni M Shtein; Stephen C Kaufman; Sophie X Deng; Mark I Rosenblatt
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Long-Term Outcomes of the Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis in the Management of Corneal Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.

Authors:  Carolina Aravena; Tahir Kansu Bozkurt; Fei Yu; Anthony J Aldave
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: the CHUM experience.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Robert; Mona Harissi-Dagher
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.882

Review 5.  Evaluation and management of glaucoma after keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Michael Banitt
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.761

6.  Glaucoma associated with keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  P A Netland; H Terada; C H Dohlman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Optical functional properties of the Boston Keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Rony R Sayegh; Linda Avena Diaz; Fernando Vargas-Martín; Robert H Webb; Claes H Dohlman; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Long-term outcomes of boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation: a retrospective multicenter cohort.

Authors:  Divya Srikumaran; Beatriz Munoz; Anthony J Aldave; James V Aquavella; Sadeer B Hannush; Robert Schultze; Michael Belin; Esen Karamursel Akpek
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Glaucoma progression and role of glaucoma surgery in patients with Boston keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Alja Crnej; Eleftherios I Paschalis; Borja Salvador-Culla; Allyson Tauber; Brigita Drnovsek-Olup; Lucy Q Shen; Claes H Dohlman
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Boston keratoprosthesis outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Hall F Chew; Brandon D Ayres; Kristin M Hammersmith; Christopher J Rapuano; Peter R Laibson; Jonathan S Myers; Ya-Ping Jin; Elisabeth J Cohen
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  3 in total

1.  Glaucoma After Corneal Trauma or Surgery-A Rapid, Inflammatory, IOP-Independent Pathway.

Authors:  Claes H Dohlman; Chengxin Zhou; Fengyang Lei; Fabiano Cade; Caio V Regatieri; Alja Črnej; Jan G Dohlman; Lucy Q Shen; Eleftherios I Paschalis
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 2.  Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Updated Perspectives.

Authors:  Manachai Nonpassopon; Muanploy Niparugs; Maria Soledad Cortina
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-29

Review 3.  Challenges of Glaucoma Management in Patients with Type I Boston Keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Sara M AlHilali; Samar A Al-Swailem
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.