Literature DB >> 26162549

Biomechanics and strain mapping in bone as related to immediately-loaded dental implants.

Jing Du1, Ji-Hyun Lee1, Andrew T Jang2, Allen Gu3, Mehran Hossaini-Zadeh4, Richard Prevost5, Donald A Curtis1, Sunita P Ho6.   

Abstract

The effects of alveolar bone socket geometry and bone-implant contact on implant biomechanics, and resulting strain distributions in bone were investigated. Following extraction of lateral incisors on a cadaver mandible, implants were placed immediately and bone-implant contact area, stability implant biomechanics and bone strain were measured. In situ biomechanical testing coupled with micro X-ray microscopy (µ-XRM) illustrated less stiff bone-implant complexes (701-822 N/mm) compared with bone-periodontal ligament (PDL)-tooth complexes (791-913 N/mm). X-ray tomograms illustrated that the cause of reduced stiffness was due to limited bone-implant contact. Heterogeneous elemental composition of bone was identified by using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The novel aspect of this study was the application of a new experimental mechanics method, that is, digital volume correlation, which allowed mapping of strains in volumes of alveolar bone in contact with a loaded implant. The identified surface and subsurface strain concentrations were a manifestation of load transferred to bone through bone-implant contact based on bone-implant geometry, quality of bone, implant placement, and implant design. 3D strain mapping indicated that strain concentrations are not exclusive to the bone-implant contact regions, but also extend into bone not directly in contact with the implant. The implications of the observed strain concentrations are discussed in the context of mechanobiology. Although a plausible explanation of surgical complications for immediate implant treatment is provided, extrapolation of results is only warranted by future systematic studies on more cadaver specimens and/or in vivo models.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alveolar bone; Bone–implant contact; Digital volume correlation; Implant; Strain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26162549      PMCID: PMC4663100          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  45 in total

Review 1.  In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface.

Authors:  J B Brunski
Journal:  Adv Dent Res       Date:  1999-06

2.  A strain gauge and photoelastic analysis of in vivo strain and in vitro stress distribution in human dental supporting structures.

Authors:  A Asundi; A Kishen
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.633

3.  Stress distribution in the dento-alveolar system using digital photoelasticity.

Authors:  A Asundi; A Kishen
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.617

4.  The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants.

Authors:  H Van Oosterwyck; J Duyck; J Vander Sloten; G Van der Perre; M De Cooman; S Lievens; R Puers; I Naert
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study.

Authors:  D O'Sullivan; L Sennerby; N Meredith
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.932

6.  Advanced digital photoelastic investigations on the tooth-bone interface.

Authors:  A Asundi; A Kishen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Mapping of tooth deformation caused by moisture change using moiré interferometry.

Authors:  Judy D Wood; Rizhi Wang; Steve Weiner; David H Pashley
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  A three-dimensional digital image correlation technique for strain measurements in microstructures.

Authors:  E Verhulp; B van Rietbergen; R Huiskes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Biomechanical time-tolerance of fresh cadaveric human spine specimens.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; M Krag; D Summers; T Videman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Enamel microstructure and microstrain in the fracture of human and pig molar cusps.

Authors:  T E Popowics; J M Rensberger; S W Herring
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.633

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Voxel-based micro-finite element analysis of dental implants in a human cadaveric mandible: Tissue modulus assignment and sensitivity analyses.

Authors:  Qiyuan Mao; Kangning Su; Yuxiao Zhou; Mehran Hossaini-Zadeh; Gregory S Lewis; Jing Du
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-03-13

3.  3D full-field strain in bone-implant and bone-tooth constructs and their morphological influential factors.

Authors:  Yuxiao Zhou; Chujie Gong; Mehran Hossaini-Zadeh; Jing Du
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-05-19

4.  Functional tooth mobility in young pigs.

Authors:  Atriya Salamati; Jie Chen; Susan W Herring; Zi-Jun Liu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Hydroxyapatite (HA)/poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) dual coating on magnesium alloy under deformation for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Mathilde Diez; Min-Ho Kang; Sae-Mi Kim; Hyoun-Ee Kim; Juha Song
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Micromechanical modeling of the contact stiffness of an osseointegrated bone-implant interface.

Authors:  Maria Letizia Raffa; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Guillaume Haiat
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Mechanoadaptive strain and functional osseointegration of dental implants in rats.

Authors:  B Wang; K Kim; S Srirangapatanam; P Ustriyana; S E Wheelis; S Fakra; M Kang; D C Rodrigues; S P Ho
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Effects of implant buccal distance on peri-implant strain: A Micro-CT based finite element analysis.

Authors:  Kangning Su; Yuxiao Zhou; Mehran Hossaini-Zadeh; Jing Du
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-01-13

9.  Investigating the Mechanical Characteristics of Bone-Metal Implant Interface Using in situ Synchrotron Tomographic Imaging.

Authors:  Sophie Le Cann; Erika Tudisco; Mikael J Turunen; Alessandra Patera; Rajmund Mokso; Magnus Tägil; Ola Belfrage; Stephen A Hall; Hanna Isaksson
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-01-21

10.  Measurement of Internal Implantation Strains in Analogue Bone Using DVC.

Authors:  Alexander Marter; Charles Burson-Thomas; Alexander Dickinson; Kathryn Rankin; Mark Mavrogordato; Fabrice Pierron; Martin Browne
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.