Literature DB >> 4032102

Biomechanical time-tolerance of fresh cadaveric human spine specimens.

M M Panjabi, M Krag, D Summers, T Videman.   

Abstract

Changes in the biomechanical properties of fresh cadaveric spinal specimens due to long-term freeze storage and long test periods have been investigated. Fresh cadaveric specimens were divided into three groups: Group A specimens were tested fresh on the 1st day and 13 subsequent days; Group B specimens were tested on the 1st day, frozen in sealed bags at -18 degrees C for 21 days, and tested for 13 consecutive days after thawing; and Group C specimens were frozen for up to 232 days and tested for 14 consecutive days after thawing. We could not find any significant differences between the behavior of the three test groups. This implies that freezing and storage, even for long periods, do not significantly alter the physical properties of cadaveric spinal specimens. Concerning the differences observed on a daily basis, the mean value of the maximum displacement for the 1st day did not differ significantly from the corresponding mean value for the 13 consecutive days. This was true for all three groups, although there was some indication that the fresh group specimens showed greater variation than the two frozen groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4032102     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100030305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  47 in total

1.  Effect of constrained posterior screw and rod systems for primary stability: biomechanical in vitro comparison of various instrumentations in a single-level corpectomy model.

Authors:  René Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lutz Claes; Wolfhart Puhl; Marcus Richter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior and combined techniques for the reconstruction of a 2-level cervical corpectomy model: biomechanical study and first results of ATPS prototyping.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Rene Schmidt; Michael Mayer; Wolfgang Hitzl; Juliane Zenner; Stefan Midderhoff; Stefan Middendorf; Nicolaus Graf; Nicolaus Gräf; H Resch; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Hans-Joachim Willke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical analysis of a new expandable vertebral body replacement combined with a new polyaxial antero-lateral plate and/or pedicle screws and rods.

Authors:  Benjamin Ulmar; Stefanie Erhart; Stefan Unger; Kuno Weise; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Human lumbar spine creep during cyclic and static flexion: creep rate, biomechanics, and facet joint capsule strain.

Authors:  Jesse S Little; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Material properties of the human lumbar facet joint capsule.

Authors:  Jesse S Little; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Primary stability of anterior lumbar stabilization: interdependence of implant type and endplate retention or removal.

Authors:  Christian H Flamme; Nadine von der Heide; Caroline Heymann; Christof Hurschler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Stress in lumbar intervertebral discs during distraction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Ralph E Gay; Brice Ilharreborde; Kristin D Zhao; Lawrence J Berglund; Gert Bronfort; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Whiplash causes increased laxity of cervical capsular ligament.

Authors:  Paul C Ivancic; Shigeki Ito; Yasuhiro Tominaga; Wolfgang Rubin; Marcus P Coe; Anthony B Ndu; Erik J Carlson; Manohar M Panjabi
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  En bloc spondylectomy reconstructions in a biomechanical in-vitro study.

Authors:  A C Disch; K D Schaser; I Melcher; A Luzzati; F Feraboli; W Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Three-dimensional biomechanical properties of the human cervical spine in vitro. I. Analysis of normal motion.

Authors:  N Wen; F Lavaste; J J Santin; J P Lassau
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.