CONTEXT: African Americans have a lower total serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] but superior bone health. This has been referred to as a paradox. A recent publication found that free serum 25(OH)D is the same in black and white individuals. However, the study was criticized because an indirect method was used to measure free 25(OH)D. A direct method has recently been developed. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that although total serum 25(OH)D is lower in African Americans, free serum 25(OH)D measured directly would not differ between races. DESIGN: White and black healthy postmenopausal women were matched for age and body mass index. Serum total 25(OH)D, PTH, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), and bone density were measured. Measurement of free 25(OH)D was carried out using an ELISA. SETTING: The study was conducted at an ambulatory research unit in a teaching hospital. OUTCOME: A cross-racial comparison of serum free 25(OH)D was performed. RESULTS: A propensity match resulted in the selection of a total of 164 women. Total 25(OH)D was lower in black women (19.5 ± 4.7 vs 26.9 ± 6.4 ng/mL), but a direct measurement of free 25(OH)D revealed almost identical values (5.25 ± 1.2 vs 5.25 ± 1.3 ng/mL) between races. VDBP was significantly lower in blacks when using a monoclonal-based ELISA but higher with a polyclonal-based ELISA. Serum PTH, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and bone density were higher in African Americans. CONCLUSIONS: Free serum 25(OH)D is the same across races despite the lower total serum 25(OH)D in black women. Results comparing VDBP between races using a monoclonal vs a polyclonal assay were discordant.
CONTEXT: African Americans have a lower total serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] but superior bone health. This has been referred to as a paradox. A recent publication found that free serum 25(OH)D is the same in black and white individuals. However, the study was criticized because an indirect method was used to measure free 25(OH)D. A direct method has recently been developed. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that although total serum 25(OH)D is lower in African Americans, free serum 25(OH)D measured directly would not differ between races. DESIGN: White and black healthy postmenopausal women were matched for age and body mass index. Serum total 25(OH)D, PTH, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), and bone density were measured. Measurement of free 25(OH)D was carried out using an ELISA. SETTING: The study was conducted at an ambulatory research unit in a teaching hospital. OUTCOME: A cross-racial comparison of serum free 25(OH)D was performed. RESULTS: A propensity match resulted in the selection of a total of 164 women. Total 25(OH)D was lower in black women (19.5 ± 4.7 vs 26.9 ± 6.4 ng/mL), but a direct measurement of free 25(OH)D revealed almost identical values (5.25 ± 1.2 vs 5.25 ± 1.3 ng/mL) between races. VDBP was significantly lower in blacks when using a monoclonal-based ELISA but higher with a polyclonal-based ELISA. Serum PTH, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and bone density were higher in African Americans. CONCLUSIONS: Free serum 25(OH)D is the same across races despite the lower total serum 25(OH)D in black women. Results comparing VDBP between races using a monoclonal vs a polyclonal assay were discordant.
Authors: John F Aloia; Ruban Dhaliwal; Albert Shieh; Mageda Mikhail; Melissa Fazzari; Louis Ragolia; Steven A Abrams Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Michelle Braun; Cristina Palacios; Karin Wigertz; Lisa A Jackman; Rebecca J Bryant; Linda D McCabe; Berdine R Martin; George P McCabe; Munro Peacock; Connie M Weaver Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Camille E Powe; Michele K Evans; Julia Wenger; Alan B Zonderman; Anders H Berg; Michael Nalls; Hector Tamez; Dongsheng Zhang; Ishir Bhan; S Ananth Karumanchi; Neil R Powe; Ravi Thadhani Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Heidi J Kalkwarf; Babette S Zemel; Vicente Gilsanz; Joan M Lappe; Mary Horlick; Sharon Oberfield; Soroosh Mahboubi; Bo Fan; Margaret M Frederick; Karen Winer; John A Shepherd Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-02-20 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Ethel S Siris; Lois E Wehren; Paul D Miller; Thomas A Abbott; Marc L Berger; Arthur C Santora; Louis M Sherwood Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2004-10-18 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Rene F Chun; Ivan Hernandez; Renata Pereira; Leon Swinkles; Tonnie Huijs; Rui Zhou; Nancy Q Liu; Albert Shieh; Miriam Guemes; Sanjay M Mallya; John S Adams; Martin Hewison Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: J M Franasiak; X Wang; T A Molinaro; K Green; W Sun; M D Werner; C R Juneau; R T Scott Journal: Endocrine Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Rosemary L Schleicher; Maya R Sternberg; Anne C Looker; Elizabeth A Yetley; David A Lacher; Christopher T Sempos; Christine L Taylor; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu; Khin L Maw; Madhulika Chaudhary-Webb; Clifford L Johnson; Christine M Pfeiffer Journal: J Nutr Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Moon Jeong Lee; Malcolm D Kearns; Ellen M Smith; Li Hao; Thomas R Ziegler; Jessica A Alvarez; Vin Tangpricha Journal: Am J Med Sci Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 2.378
Authors: John J Lima; Mario Castro; Tonya S King; Jason E Lang; Victor E Ortega; Stephen P Peters; Loren C Denlinger; Elliot Israel; Christine A Sorkness; Michael E Wechsler; Sally E Wenzel; Lewis J Smith Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Albert Shieh; Rene F Chun; Christina Ma; Sten Witzel; Briana Meyer; Brandon Rafison; Leon Swinkels; Tonnie Huijs; Sam Pepkowitz; Brett Holmquist; Martin Hewison; John S Adams Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Naweed S Alzaman; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Jason Nelson; David D'Alessio; Anastassios G Pittas Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 7.045