Literature DB >> 32237858

Development of the Everyday Conversational Sentences in Noise test.

Kelly M Miles1, Gitte Keidser2, Katrina Freeston3, Timothy Beechey4, Virginia Best5, Jörg M Buchholz3.   

Abstract

To capture the demands of real-world listening, laboratory-based speech-in-noise tasks must better reflect the types of speech and environments listeners encounter in everyday life. This article reports the development of original sentence materials that were produced spontaneously with varying vocal efforts. These sentences were extracted from conversations between a talker pair (female/male) communicating in different realistic acoustic environments to elicit normal, raised and loud vocal efforts. In total, 384 sentences were extracted to provide four equivalent lists of 16 sentences at the three efforts for the two talkers. The sentences were presented to 32 young, normally hearing participants in stationary noise at five signal-to-noise ratios from -8 to 0 dB in 2 dB steps. Psychometric functions were fitted for each sentence, revealing an average 50% speech reception threshold (SRT50) of -5.2 dB, and an average slope of 17.2%/dB. Sentences were then level-normalised to adjust their individual SRT50 to the mean (-5.2 dB). The sentences may be combined with realistic background noise to provide an assessment method that better captures the perceptual demands of everyday communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32237858      PMCID: PMC7060086          DOI: 10.1121/10.0000780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of a mixed gender, multi-talker matrix sentence test in Australian English.

Authors:  Heather Kelly; Gaven Lin; Narayan Sankaran; Jing Xia; Sridhar Kalluri; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  An adaptive Australian Sentence Test in Noise (AuSTIN).

Authors:  Pam W Dawson; Adam A Hersbach; Brett A Swanson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Development of a test battery for evaluating speech perception in complex listening environments.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Benjamin M Sheffield; Lina R Kubli
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses.

Authors:  W V Summers; D B Pisoni; R H Bernacki; R I Pedlow; M A Stokes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Regulation of voice communication by sensory dynamics.

Authors:  H Lane; B Tranel; C Sisson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Speech understanding and aging. Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  B Hagerman
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1982

8.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

Authors:  J Bench; A Kowal; J Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-08

9.  LIST and LINT: sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Emma Holmes; Paula Folkeard; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Susan Scollie
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  3 in total

1.  Spatial Resolution of Late Reverberation in Virtual Acoustic Environments.

Authors:  Christoph Kirsch; Josef Poppitz; Torben Wendt; Steven van de Par; Stephan D Ewert
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

2.  Measuring Speech Intelligibility and Hearing-Aid Benefit Using Everyday Conversational Sentences in Real-World Environments.

Authors:  Kelly Miles; Timothy Beechey; Virginia Best; Jörg Buchholz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  The Effect of Age, Type of Noise, and Cochlear Implants on Adaptive Sentence-in-Noise Task.

Authors:  Riki Taitelbaum-Swead; Leah Fostick
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.