Literature DB >> 23304412

Logical Differential Prediction Bayes Net, improving breast cancer diagnosis for older women.

Houssam Nassif1, Yirong Wu, David Page, Elizabeth Burnside.   

Abstract

Overdiagnosis is a phenomenon in which screening identities cancer which may not go on to cause symptoms or death. Women over 65 who develop breast cancer bear the heaviest burden of overdiagnosis. This work introduces novel machine learning algorithms to improve diagnostic accuracy of breast cancer in aging populations. At the same time, we aim at minimizing unnecessary invasive procedures (thus decreasing false positives) and concomitantly addressing overdiagnosis. We develop a novel algorithm. Logical Differential Prediction Bayes Net (LDP-BN), that calculates the risk of breast disease based on mammography findings. LDP-BN uses Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) to learn relational rules, selects older-specific differentially predictive rules, and incorporates them into a Bayes Net, significantly improving its performance. In addition, LDP-BN offers valuable insight into the classification process, revealing novel older-specific rules that link mass presence to invasive, and calcification presence and lack of detectable mass to DCIS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23304412      PMCID: PMC3540455     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  35 in total

1.  A longitudinal study of factors associated with perceived risk of recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and early-stage invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Maria Pérez; Mario Schootman; Rebecca L Aft; William E Gillanders; Matthew J Ellis; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Breast biopsy utilization: a population-based study.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; L Joseph Melton; Vera J Suman; Clive S Grant; Sylvester Sterioff; Kathy R Brandt; Charles Branch; Thomas A Sellers; Lynn C Hartmann
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-07-25

3.  Is age at diagnosis an independent prognostic factor for survival following breast cancer?

Authors:  Upali W Jayasinghe; Richard Taylor; John Boyages
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  The natural history of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in women treated by biopsy only revealed over 30 years of long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Melinda E Sanders; Peggy A Schuyler; William D Dupont; David L Page
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.

Authors:  J G Elmore; M B Barton; V M Moceri; S Polk; P J Arena; S W Fletcher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Effect of age and comorbidity in postmenopausal breast cancer patients aged 55 years and older.

Authors:  R Yancik; M N Wesley; L A Ries; R J Havlik; B K Edwards; J W Yates
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Young age as an independent adverse prognostic factor in premenopausal patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Dubsky; Michael F X Gnant; Susanne Taucher; Sebastian Roka; Daniela Kandioler; Barbara Pichler-Gebhard; Irene Agstner; Michael Seifert; Paul Sevelda; Raimund Jakesz
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Age-specific trends in mammographic density: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study.

Authors:  Linda E Kelemen; V Shane Pankratz; Thomas A Sellers; Kathy R Brandt; Alice Wang; Carol Janney; Zachary S Fredericksen; James R Cerhan; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Authors:  R D Rosenberg; W C Hunt; M R Williamson; F D Gilliland; P W Wiest; C A Kelsey; C R Key; M N Linver
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Information Extraction for Clinical Data Mining: A Mammography Case Study.

Authors:  Houssam Nassif; Ryan Woods; Elizabeth Burnside; Mehmet Ayvaci; Jude Shavlik; David Page
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Data Min       Date:  2009
View more
  4 in total

1.  Score As You Lift (SAYL): A Statistical Relational Learning Approach to Uplift Modeling.

Authors:  Houssam Nassif; Finn Kuusisto; Elizabeth S Burnside; David Page; Jude Shavlik; Vítor Santos Costa
Journal:  Mach Learn Knowl Discov Databases       Date:  2013

2.  Systematic evaluation of supervised classifiers for fecal microbiota-based prediction of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Luoyan Ai; Haiying Tian; Zhaofei Chen; Huimin Chen; Jie Xu; Jing-Yuan Fang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-07

3.  Using Decision Tree Aggregation with Random Forest Model to Identify Gut Microbes Associated with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Dongmei Ai; Hongfei Pan; Rongbao Han; Xiaoxin Li; Gang Liu; Li C Xia
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Integrating Expert Knowledge with Data in Bayesian Networks: Preserving Data-Driven Expectations when the Expert Variables Remain Unobserved.

Authors:  Anthony Costa Constantinou; Norman Fenton; Martin Neil
Journal:  Expert Syst Appl       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 6.954

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.